It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: TheSemiSkeptic
There were a lot of emails on her server that contained classified information. She used the email to do her duties in that position.
originally posted by: TheSemiSkeptic
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: TheSemiSkeptic
There were a lot of emails on her server that contained classified information. She used the email to do her duties in that position.
I don't need to prove that there were classified materials on her server, You stated it right there.
no one can prove to your satisfaction that anything was classified
although anyone with common sense can easily see that if emails are redacted before release, then they contained classified information of some sort.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: TheSemiSkeptic
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: TheSemiSkeptic
There were a lot of emails on her server that contained classified information. She used the email to do her duties in that position.
I don't need to prove that there were classified materials on her server, You stated it right there.
All of which were handed over when requested. That's why no charges have been filed. It is not against SD procedures to use a private email for official government business as long as the records are available upon request.
originally posted by: RickinVa
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: TheSemiSkeptic
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: TheSemiSkeptic
There were a lot of emails on her server that contained classified information. She used the email to do her duties in that position.
I don't need to prove that there were classified materials on her server, You stated it right there.
All of which were handed over when requested. That's why no charges have been filed. It is not against SD procedures to use a private email for official government business as long as the records are available upon request.
It is when that information is housed on a unapproved server outside of government control.. why can;t you understand that?
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: RickinVa
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: TheSemiSkeptic
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: TheSemiSkeptic
There were a lot of emails on her server that contained classified information. She used the email to do her duties in that position.
I don't need to prove that there were classified materials on her server, You stated it right there.
All of which were handed over when requested. That's why no charges have been filed. It is not against SD procedures to use a private email for official government business as long as the records are available upon request.
It is when that information is housed on a unapproved server outside of government control.. why can;t you understand that?
How was it outside of government control? They asked for the emails and received it. They also were able to get the server itself.
Everything they asked for was handed-over, including her person emails.
the point is that they were in an unauthorized location.
originally posted by: RickinVa
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: RickinVa
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: TheSemiSkeptic
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: TheSemiSkeptic
There were a lot of emails on her server that contained classified information. She used the email to do her duties in that position.
I don't need to prove that there were classified materials on her server, You stated it right there.
All of which were handed over when requested. That's why no charges have been filed. It is not against SD procedures to use a private email for official government business as long as the records are available upon request.
It is when that information is housed on a unapproved server outside of government control.. why can;t you understand that?
How was it outside of government control? They asked for the emails and received it. They also were able to get the server itself.
Everything they asked for was handed-over, including her person emails.
You didn't read any regulations about off site storage of classified information did you? You are hopeless. What do unicorns eat by the way? I have always wanted to know.
originally posted by: TheSemiSkeptic
a reply to: introvert
They only got the server when the got a warrant. They first asked, Secretary Clinton said no. It was the warrant that MADE her comply.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: TheSemiSkeptic
the point is that they were in an unauthorized location.
That would be an easy charge to put on Clinton.....if it were true. You are mistaken on such procedures. Those emails are not required to be stored on government servers. In fact, it wasn't until well after this issue came to light that the government required official communications to be transferred to government hands after 20 days.
originally posted by: RickinVa
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: RickinVa
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: TheSemiSkeptic
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: TheSemiSkeptic
There were a lot of emails on her server that contained classified information. She used the email to do her duties in that position.
I don't need to prove that there were classified materials on her server, You stated it right there.
All of which were handed over when requested. That's why no charges have been filed. It is not against SD procedures to use a private email for official government business as long as the records are available upon request.
It is when that information is housed on a unapproved server outside of government control.. why can;t you understand that?
How was it outside of government control? They asked for the emails and received it. They also were able to get the server itself.
Everything they asked for was handed-over, including her person emails.
You didn't read any regulations about off site storage of classified information did you? You are hopeless. What do unicorns eat by the way? I have always wanted to know.
Unicorns don't eat anything, because they don't exist. Kind of like the nutbag accusations against Clinton.
originally posted by: TheSemiSkeptic
a reply to: introvert
You are right, prior to this situation coming to light, there were no requirements that these types of emails were not required to be on Federal Servers.I do not know what the requirements are now.
However the location would have to be authorized, which means someone would have had to know about Secretary Clinton's private server and the use of a private email. To all accounts I have read, NO ONE knew Secretary Clinton was doing that. Therefore it could not have been authorized, if no one knew about it then no one could have authorized it.
The only thing that makes any sense about your replies is that you are hoping that you can provoke someone into saying something that will get them banned
You are right, prior to this situation coming to light, there were no requirements that these types of emails were not required to be on Federal Servers.
However the location would have to be authorized, which means someone would have had to know about Secretary Clinton's private server and the use of a private email.
originally posted by: TheSemiSkeptic
a reply to: introvert
While someone sending an email to, or receiving an email from, Secretary Clinton would see her personal domain name. That does not grant the knowledge that the server that is going to is NOT an authorized server with proper security. While this is not a violation of State Department policy. Not being an authorized server, as defined by the law, is a violation.
I can guarantee you that asking a federal employee to remove classification markings from a document in order to circumvent security procedures is a crime.
The email is right there for everyone to see.
It doesn't matter whether the person asked did it or not