It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: ketsuko
Well stupid is one of the last adjectives I'd ever use to describe Hillary. She is definitely NOT stupid and knows exactly what she is doing. So let's go with option 2 there.
“I’m not a liberal. Never have been. I’m a progressive who mostly focuses on the working and middle class.”
That's really all modern socialism is--helping people that can't help themselves. Is there something wrong with that? Republicans rail against it, but they never stop funding welfare or medicaid or medicare or social security or free healthcare if you walk into an emergency room or free healthcare if you have a heart attack on the street even if you're homeless.
I could have called her Blabbermouth-Schultz which is the going version if I wanted to really be childish.
So, basically, she doesn't answer at all which just says there is no practical difference
After all, when Obama said that he would always view marriage as being between a man and a woman, it didn't piss off the gay lobby, so it can't be that her giving an answer would piss off the socialists who have always been in the pocket of Democrats.
They would do what the gays did
And if there is a real worry they wouldn't, then that's what her handlers make their money doing - crafting answers she can give to questions like this one.
After all, there are far more people in this country who are worried that there really IS no difference between democrat and socialist than that there might be a difference.
So you give up on votes?
The idea that socialists don't think they're being denied their rights is laughable. Just visit any thread about the medical system and you'll see them whining over a lack of single payer for example because health care is a right. That's an expression of what they see as a denial of right.
Many also wax poetic about how we should have basic incomes, increased minimum wage, etc., workers being again denied their rights to a "fair" wage
which comes from the socialist world view that businesses exist to provide jobs more than to make money.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: introvert
To all self-proclaimed socialists (Introvert, I can't remember if that includes you):
How would YOU consider your political worldview different from that of a Democrat?...or do you feel there IS no difference?
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: introvert
To all self-proclaimed socialists (Introvert, I can't remember if that includes you):
How would YOU consider your political worldview different from that of a Democrat?...or do you feel there IS no difference?
Democrats are corporate ass-kissing pansies that are nothing more than Diet Republicans. They claim to work for the little man, but they represent their own interests by aligning with money brokers and the military-industrial complex.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: introvert
To all self-proclaimed socialists (Introvert, I can't remember if that includes you):
How would YOU consider your political worldview different from that of a Democrat?...or do you feel there IS no difference?
Democrats are corporate ass-kissing pansies that are nothing more than Diet Republicans. They claim to work for the little man, but they represent their own interests by aligning with money brokers and the military-industrial complex.
Okay. That actually helps. Thank you.
What about Liberal vs. Progressive?
Is Progressive the new Liberal?