It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump Media Manipulation? Claims to have support of women and minorities, but where are they?

page: 9
5
<< 6  7  8    10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 5 2016 @ 05:21 PM
link   
a reply to: theySeeme

How? You talk in innuendo and secrecy....




posted on Jan, 5 2016 @ 05:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: theySeeme

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: theySeeme
All I know is trump has just increased his long list of growing lies.


Should any candidate that has been shown to lie be eligible to run for president?


Why do you ask?


In order to find out.

Questions are designed to elicit a response.



posted on Jan, 5 2016 @ 05:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: matafuchs

Minorities, historically and in the last few elections a 99 to 1 ratio, are now are 5-12% for the GOP. That is enough to swing the current Reuters polls that have Clinton winning by less than 6%.

THESE are all facts. Use the internets and look it up if you like.


Those are NOT the facts.

Bush had 26% of the non-white vote in 2004. Romney had 17% of the non-white vote in 2012. If that were to drop to the 5-12% range you are talking about the GOP will get annihilated.



posted on Jan, 5 2016 @ 05:28 PM
link   

So at all these Trump [snipped] rallies, it's quite clear that women and minorities are pretty much no where to be found


Just by looking at the pictures you can see that,that quote is a bold faced lie, why this entire thread hasn`t been moved to the Ludicrous Online Lies forum says a lot.



posted on Jan, 5 2016 @ 05:49 PM
link   
a reply to: DelMarvel

Sorry, I was actually referring to the black vote. This is the one that in the forums people have said are not represented.



posted on Jan, 5 2016 @ 05:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: theySeeme

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: theySeeme
All I know is trump has just increased his long list of growing lies.


Should any candidate that has been shown to lie be eligible to run for president?


Why do you ask?


In order to find out.

Questions are designed to elicit a response.


Well here I am eliciting a response on why do you want to find out?



posted on Jan, 5 2016 @ 05:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: jheated5
Yes Trump is manipulating the master manipulators the MSM.... This surely belongs in the jokes forum... Klan rallies HAHAHAH. If anyone in this thread happens to be white, you are now considered part of the Klan according to the OP.


NO NO it couldn't have been a Klan rally I saw an Asain guy in the crowd.



posted on Jan, 5 2016 @ 06:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: theySeeme

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: theySeeme

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: theySeeme
All I know is trump has just increased his long list of growing lies.


Should any candidate that has been shown to lie be eligible to run for president?


Why do you ask?


In order to find out.

Questions are designed to elicit a response.


Well here I am eliciting a response on why do you want to find out?


There is nothing that says you have to respond to me.

I just wanted to know if you held all politicians to the same level as you hold Trump.

But it doesn't matter. We know how you feel about Trump and anyone who supports him.

Have a nice day.



posted on Jan, 5 2016 @ 07:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: DelMarvel

Sorry, I was actually referring to the black vote. This is the one that in the forums people have said are not represented.


Even the black vote by itself has not been "historically and in the last few elections a 99 to 1 ratio" as you claimed.
edit on 5-1-2016 by DelMarvel because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 5 2016 @ 08:01 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

It's cool, friend.



posted on Jan, 5 2016 @ 09:17 PM
link   
a reply to: DelMarvel

Gallup show the following....

2000 was 95 to 3
2004 was 93 to 7
2008 was 99 to 1



posted on Jan, 5 2016 @ 09:36 PM
link   
a reply to: theySeeme

Where? From pictures in your own source:











Pretty sure I missed at least a couple, too. Anyway, they are both clearly there. Nicely marked for you. Does this help?



posted on Jan, 5 2016 @ 09:53 PM
link   
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes

Those are elaborate Photoshop images that Trump pays millions to create...



posted on Jan, 5 2016 @ 10:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes

Those are elaborate Photoshop images that Trump pays millions to create...


Could also be old photos from Obama rallies in 2008.




posted on Jan, 5 2016 @ 10:09 PM
link   
Found some more for you!











Don't know why you can't seem to find them; they are all over the images I see.



posted on Jan, 5 2016 @ 10:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: DelMarvel

Gallup show the following....

2000 was 95 to 3
2004 was 93 to 7
2008 was 99 to 1


2000 was 90% to 9%.

ropercenter.cornell.edu...
2004 was 88% to 11%

ropercenter.cornell.edu...

2008 was 95% to 4%
ropercenter.cornell.edu...

None of which are "99 to 1."
edit on 5-1-2016 by DelMarvel because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 5 2016 @ 10:15 PM
link   
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes

Nice to see the Klan is so female-friendly these days. Guess all those Klan racists are afraid of being called sexists, too.



posted on Jan, 5 2016 @ 10:26 PM
link   
Mods...why have you allowed this BS thread to continue as long as it has?
It started with a bigoted premise and opening sentence:


"So at all these Trump klan rallies"

...which, to ATS's credit, you forcibly snipped.

But c'mon...LadyGreenEyes (above) has thoroughly discredited the rest of the OP's premise:



it's quite clear that women and minorities are pretty much no where to be found, yet the trump campaign claims to have majority of support from minorities and women compared to other candidates, however there is NO diversity for these subjects at any trump rally including the one yesterday.


This thread was and is a sham from it's inception...and the OP has exhibited the very worst bigoted and partisan behavior, throughout.

ATS is better than this.
Mods....it's time to hoax bin this thread.
edit on 5-1-2016 by IAMTAT because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 5 2016 @ 10:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes

Those are elaborate Photoshop images that Trump pays millions to create...


Oh silly me! I should know better.
/sarcasm

On a serious note, how funny that the OP posted a link that refutes his own claim! ...and they claim Trump supporters aren't smart...



posted on Jan, 5 2016 @ 10:42 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

I know, right? We womenfolk sure have come a long way, huh?

This thread is a joke!



new topics

top topics



 
5
<< 6  7  8    10 >>

log in

join