It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Klassified
originally posted by: Tucket
Travelling the boards, Ive noticed that various atheists seem to be disgruntled former xtians who were fed christianity by fundie parents... Now that theyve liberated themselves, they feel the need (or just for funsies) to try and talk sense (or belittle) into those silly Christians who still hold faith.
Of course, no Christians ever feel the need to try and talk sense into those silly athiests/agnostics who hold no faith. And they certainly wouldn't use the threat of eternal damnation. Not once in 2000 years.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: enlightenedservant
I never said religion is the only way they justify their wars only that they have and will continue to use religion to justify their wars as long as they find it useful.
Will they use religion every time? No, but it has been a motivating factor in many many wars throughout history, including today in the Middle East. There are huge religious undertones behind the war in the Middle East today and the media capitalizes on it every day with their rhetoric.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: OpenEars123
Do you want to live your own life or have God live it for you?
If he solves all of our problems, the ones in our control as well the ones outside them, then at what point is your life your own to live?
The point of this existence is to see what you make of it on your own. What are your choices? How do you handle what life throws at you?
If you have God saving you from every bump, then you never will know.
originally posted by: OpenEars123
originally posted by: spirit_horse
originally posted by: OpenEars123
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: OpenEars123
The idea of earning your reward isn't about living longer here.
Some of us have what others would perceive as easier lives here, true. But until you have stepped in that person's shoes, you don't know what their life was really despite what the external perception seemed to be. Robin Williams, to most people, had everything, and yet, he took his own life. Clearly, HE didn't have what he needed or wanted on some level, and no matter how much he seemed to have going for him, it wasn't what made his life bearable to him.
So, do you know what his life was like?
Where was God for him in this life? Clearly, you could say God gave him everything that kid with cancer doesn't have, but it didn't help Robin Williams in the end.
Robin Williams was a nice guy, or 'seemed' to be from the perception that the media gave us. I liked him, and was sad to see him go.
Innocent 1,2,3 and 4 year old kids don't 'need' to be given a perception in order to be or not be worthy of 'help' Kids (literally all of them) deserve help when they are dying, literally all of them. And that's just innocent kids we're talking about, let alone the amazing adults we all lose daily to disease, famine, murder, rape, torture... Admit it, if there is a god, he is one brutal mother#####r.
Well, I would argue he gave mankind freewill. If he was to impose changes of circumstances it would interfere with freewill. It sucks I agree, but it was spelled out in the beginning. Humans made their own mess and it is those brutal humans that should be blamed for the situation.
Blame the humans for all the diseases and famine?
I don't think so, I think it's nature. But to those who believe in an omnipresent deity, you should take the blame of your creator. Why worship him/it otherwise???
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: enlightenedservant
I never said religion is the only way they justify their wars only that they have and will continue to use religion to justify their wars as long as they find it useful.
Will they use religion every time? No, but it has been a motivating factor in many many wars throughout history, including today in the Middle East. There are huge religious undertones behind the war in the Middle East today and the media capitalizes on it every day with their rhetoric.
originally posted by: Metallicus
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: Metallicus
I am not involved in a religion and I certainly find aspects of Christianity silly or non-nonsensical, however, I don't feel the need to get involved in their threads and go out of my way to tell them how I feel.
Why not?
...
World Peace depends on it.
Well, if you think 'world peace' depends on people making fun of or criticizing Christianity and religion in general then we just don't agree. I find governments to be the threat to world peace, not religion.
But the comparison in you OP of Christians to Santa say a lot. Everyone over 10 knows that is a story. However, that is not necessarily the case with believers in God. I guess it is up to each individual. I say I could care less because I have died twice in my life and know better. However, the experience doesn't jive with any particular dogma, but the reality of a universal consciousness that I think religions try to explain.
Regardless, I could see joining in on discussions of evangelism as atheists always claim they don't want people to hear one side and not the other. Joining in on a theological debate among believers really makes no sense.
I doubt anyone that is a believer really cares if you do or don't
I wouldn't. It just seems an odd thing to do if you don't believe as it is a discussion among whatever religion about their beliefs, not whether any of them believe or not.
What right did I or anyone else have to tear down his belief system, one that gave him comfort and joy, hope, peace and inspiration?
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: OpenEars123
originally posted by: spirit_horse
originally posted by: OpenEars123
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: OpenEars123
The idea of earning your reward isn't about living longer here.
Some of us have what others would perceive as easier lives here, true. But until you have stepped in that person's shoes, you don't know what their life was really despite what the external perception seemed to be. Robin Williams, to most people, had everything, and yet, he took his own life. Clearly, HE didn't have what he needed or wanted on some level, and no matter how much he seemed to have going for him, it wasn't what made his life bearable to him.
So, do you know what his life was like?
Where was God for him in this life? Clearly, you could say God gave him everything that kid with cancer doesn't have, but it didn't help Robin Williams in the end.
Robin Williams was a nice guy, or 'seemed' to be from the perception that the media gave us. I liked him, and was sad to see him go.
Innocent 1,2,3 and 4 year old kids don't 'need' to be given a perception in order to be or not be worthy of 'help' Kids (literally all of them) deserve help when they are dying, literally all of them. And that's just innocent kids we're talking about, let alone the amazing adults we all lose daily to disease, famine, murder, rape, torture... Admit it, if there is a god, he is one brutal mother#####r.
Well, I would argue he gave mankind freewill. If he was to impose changes of circumstances it would interfere with freewill. It sucks I agree, but it was spelled out in the beginning. Humans made their own mess and it is those brutal humans that should be blamed for the situation.
Blame the humans for all the diseases and famine?
I don't think so, I think it's nature. But to those who believe in an omnipresent deity, you should take the blame of your creator. Why worship him/it otherwise???
Actually, you can blame humans for a good chunk of them.
Look at famine ... we produce more than enough to feed the world. There is enough that gets to starving countries to feed them even from wealthier countries, but often corrupt officials keep it from getting where it needs to go, so the famine is never relieved.
Look at Africa. It used to have its own breadbasket that was as productive as the US heartland, but then the African colonial powers handed over their reign to the locals who were corrupt officials and made a practice of seizing the land and giving it to their cronies who knew nothing about how to run the farms. Now, there is no more African breadbasket.
Governments in developed countries think we are so isolated from famine by modernity that they have stopped storing food. The reality is that all it will take is a bad harvest or three to wipe out our food supplies and land even the most developed countries into famine.
We do these things to ourselves as much, if not more, than nature does these days.
Disease is much the same.
We know how to learn the tactics of disease. How it spreads. We can fight it on that level.
Look at HIV. You have to be grade A stupid NOT to know how that spreads. And yet look at how many still get it.
The other STDs are no different. You can mock God and his prohibitions against sex out of marriage, but that simple rule is the Biblical, old school way to avoid getting things like HIV, syphilis, and gonorrhea (which is rapidly becoming multi-drug resistant, btw, meaning we would no way except avoiding multiple partners to avoid it).
And you can argue that God is nowhere, but he has given us knowledge and the potential to master over our domain. He gave us the ability to solve these problems for ourselves if we can find the answers. What on earth do you think science is? Of course, it is again our own flaw that we spend our resources working on how to kill each other.
There's nothing wrong with education.
What right did I or anyone else have to tear down his belief system, one that gave him comfort and joy, hope, peace and inspiration?
He really did seem like a great kid.
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: spirit_horse
Was just reviewing the thread here and saw this.
But the comparison in you OP of Christians to Santa say a lot. Everyone over 10 knows that is a story. However, that is not necessarily the case with believers in God. I guess it is up to each individual. I say I could care less because I have died twice in my life and know better. However, the experience doesn't jive with any particular dogma, but the reality of a universal consciousness that I think religions try to explain.
I am completely in agreement with you on this.
I have not experienced death yet - but I am very much invested into what those of you who have done have to say about it. I agree with you that no one 'religion' has it 'right.'
One has only to look for the "lowest common denominator" to see where they all intersect>
and that is
The Golden Rule.
Regardless, I could see joining in on discussions of evangelism as atheists always claim they don't want people to hear one side and not the other. Joining in on a theological debate among believers really makes no sense.
But, it does. It really does. If just one person who is 'iffy' about buying whatever story is on offer is helped (one way or the other) to come to a rational and workable stance, then that is worth any effort.
That's the thing. There are more flavors of "religious belief" than there are skin colors.
I doubt anyone that is a believer really cares if you do or don't
So - then, no one cares if people who are not Christians participate? There's no problem whether they 'do' or 'don't' take part in Christian-based topics...right?
I wouldn't. It just seems an odd thing to do if you don't believe as it is a discussion among whatever religion about their beliefs, not whether any of them believe or not.
This is a charming contribution, and thank you.
Why is not a concern for myself to be honest. My faith is strong enough and I am more than ready to give an account of it. I'm happy for anyone to discuss and/or disagree
I nor anyone can enforce faith.
That said are all atheists of the same mindset. Surely being told they are a sinner and will go to hell unless they repent and seek Jesus should not be an issue if their atheistic faith is as strong as a believers???