It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: TheWhiteKnight
No NO! You are supposed to imagine a world
wherein everyone stares back at you, and asks why you aren't praying to Santa!
Because this straw man concept of God is precisely what the OP embraces. She is keeping you 'safe'.
No more growing pains for her, since God=Santa.
Or maybe it's science...? No matter. It's her call.
Wait...what?
Are you speaking for me?
I'm perfectly capable of making my own points...
And the article in the OP is pretty clear.
This thread (the OP) references an off-site answer to people who ask why non-believers feel compelled to respond to "believer" threads. I happen to think that the essay was worth posting here.
I don't know what your denomination was, but maybe you feel more strongly about it
And like the OP comparing Santa to God is typical of their comments most of the time
Either you have faith, experience dying and being brought back, or you don't
This agnostic maintains that a disbelief in a supreme being is also a faith because it's unknowable but damn, they get as bent as telling a theist that a god doesn't exist.
Atheists didn't exist before Christ?
Yes, of course I'm willing to take part in an argument about whether my interpretation of the text is accurate.
If one of my threads is looking at the meaning of a particular passage in the Bible, then that passage is a given. It is the starting-point of the discussion, which moves on from there.
Just as, if I were considering the meaning of the Data Protection Act of 1997, that document would be my starting point.
One piece of the jigsaw at a time.
And you cannot claim that I am "refusing to discuss" something if I have already discussed it in another place.
Another method of diversion is to ask"Why are you even here if you don't believe?!"
But that one isn't something you've seen in my posts, so I'm not going to comment.
If you don't like the Christian message, I don't really understand what you are doing trying to define Christian concepts.
Do I go into Buddhist discussions with a view to improving their understanding of Nirvana?
www.abovetopsecret.com...
originally posted by: NthOther
This is the closest thing I could find in the blog cited in the OP that resembles anything near an answer to the question posed in the title, and it is unsurprisingly completely childish:
If you think this all sounds ridiculous or farfetched, this is exactly what it’s like living in large portions of the United States for people who aren’t Christians. This is why we keep engaging in public discussions about God. It’s because this idea—which other people seem to think isn’t any of our business—is all up in our business every day of our lives. That makes it our business.
In other words, if you Christians are going to ruin those Atheists' days with your bulls#, they're going to ruin yours with theirs.
I've said it a thousand times: they do it out of spite, a most hateful and harmful way to be.
originally posted by: NthOther
This is the closest thing I could find in the blog cited in the OP that resembles anything near an answer to the question posed in the title, and it is unsurprisingly completely childish:
If you think this all sounds ridiculous or farfetched, this is exactly what it’s like living in large portions of the United States for people who aren’t Christians. This is why we keep engaging in public discussions about God. It’s because this idea—which other people seem to think isn’t any of our business—is all up in our business every day of our lives. That makes it our business.
In other words, if you Christians are going to ruin those Atheists' days with your bulls#, they're going to ruin yours with theirs.
I've said it a thousand times: they do it out of spite, a most hateful and harmful way to be.
isn't freedom of religion a right we have in the US?
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: NthOther
This is the closest thing I could find in the blog cited in the OP that resembles anything near an answer to the question posed in the title, and it is unsurprisingly completely childish:
If you think this all sounds ridiculous or farfetched, this is exactly what it’s like living in large portions of the United States for people who aren’t Christians. This is why we keep engaging in public discussions about God. It’s because this idea—which other people seem to think isn’t any of our business—is all up in our business every day of our lives. That makes it our business.
In other words, if you Christians are going to ruin those Atheists' days with your bulls#, they're going to ruin yours with theirs.
I've said it a thousand times: they do it out of spite, a most hateful and harmful way to be.
yeah, its a real pain in the gluteus maximus how the first amendment swings both ways, eh? what you call spite, others call reciprocation, sharing in the joy of free speech, the right to have an opinion and be proud of it.
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: CallYourBluff
No. Nice try.
It isn't a riddle, though.
I'm offering an answer to the perennial question of "why come to these threads if you're not 'Christian."
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: TonyS
Or put another way......they dump on Christians, then they dump on Santa.
But, odd, isn't it......they never dump on Allah.
Allah is just the same......
God, Jesus, Allah -----
all the same thing as Santa.
originally posted by: Klassified
Are you intentionally being obtuse? Or you really don't understand the analogy and/or what you just posted? If the latter, then I can't help you any. Seems plain enough to me.
originally posted by: windword
I said interpolation, not interpretation.
The Bible isn't that cut and dry. There is no one point in which you, or anyone, can say "This is where it starts".
You pragmatically compartmentalize. In that way you try control the input of those who find holes in and fault with whatever sermon you're trying to preach.
"If you don't like the Christian message, I don't really understand what you are doing trying to define Christian concepts.
Do I go into Buddhist discussions with a view to improving their understanding of Nirvana? "
www.abovetopsecret.com...
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: CallYourBluff
No. Nice try.
It isn't a riddle, though.
I'm offering an answer to the perennial question of "why come to these threads if you're not 'Christian."
No the person you are referring has hit the nail on the head.
The very use of "Santa Claus" and "Tooth Fairy" rather than beings like "Zeus" or "Hera" confirms it. No one ever truly thinks that Santa or the Tooth Fairy are real except for when they are very young - children. Those are infantile beliefs.
Contrast that with beings from mythology that have the respected position of having been deities accorded the respect of having been gods believed in like God is believed in, even if those religious beliefs are mostly dead today. This person can't even do that much ... Instead, he accords God a position with the infantile fantasies no one holds beyond childhood.
that was lame
originally posted by: rickymouse
I thought everyone knew Santa runs everything already. I'm kind of disappointing finding out he doesn't control the world after thanksgiving. Isn't thanksgiving the eve of black friday?