It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Thats why the original judge ruled that the crimes they were charged with (terrorism) were not justified with 5 years of incarceration.
originally posted by: svetlana84
I am a bit confused about this situation.
It s going on since 2 days now and it's still not clear what the group's political demand is?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: svetlana84
Here's a fairly recent update on the situation.
www.people.com...
Ammon Bundy said in several media interviews this weekend that the Oregon protesters want federal lands in Harney County returned to ranchers and loggers.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
Huh... they used the media and brought up the past... go figure. Just as I said, they are hijacking this issue for their own agenda.
Talk about throwing an armed sit in and no one shows up.
originally posted by: Abysha
I hope this results in the American Indian Movement following up with a similar occupation to then have that same land returned to them from the ranchers and loggers.
American ranchers and loggers making a case for some right to the land is a bit ironic to me.
originally posted by: WeDemBoyz
I'm a bit late to this game but these law breaking, criminal thugs need to be taken out by any means necessary. Deadly force is advised.
originally posted by: Dragoon01
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Dragoon01
Many people in the area of this incident may be calling the Militia all manner of names or denouncing them publicly but I would hazard a guess that the reason is they do nat want to be the next victim of the BLM. They don't have the money or time to fight the BLM so they are trying to hope it all away.
Many people in the area have come out in support of the Hammonds. Not so much support for the militia.
See the difference? The people in Oregon seem to. They seem to understand that lawlessness is not an answer.
That does not make them correct.
Many times lawlessness IS the answer.
Maybe Rosa should have just followed the law and rode in the back of the bus...
The Hammonds’ attorney has previously stated the militiamen showing up in Burns do not represent the ranchers. Still, militiamen like Payne continue to arrive.
They said it would be a peaceful march. Yet, threats are implied in many of the calls to protest from all quarters. Ammon Bundy writes that if the Hammonds are imprisoned, “there will be some serious civil unrest.” And militiaman Ryan Payne said he will do “whatever it takes” to support the Hammonds.
“What we’ve been threatened with here is civil unrest and the insinuations of armed rebellion,” said Sheriff Ward.
When the Hammonds leave for prison, Sheriff Ward said it’s local people who will be here to support the rest of the Hammond family. “These folks from Montana and Michigan and Florida and Ohio—they’re not going to make sure that the family has firewood in the wintertime, and making sure that their hay gets put up,” said Ward.
If the Hammonds won’t stand up for their rights…if the sheriff and the county commissioners won’t stand up for their rights…the people who are there as protesters, as patriots, they do not have anybody to fight.”
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: daaskapital
They don't want violence but will get violent if they are to be removed? Sounds like they want violence. Remote HQ in the middle of the forest? I would just leave them all up there to hang out until they finally went home to their lives. Not responding to them at all would send a message of not giving a hoot about their protest and avoiding needless violence.
originally posted by: Spider879
originally posted by: WeDemBoyz
I'm a bit late to this game but these law breaking, criminal thugs need to be taken out by any means necessary. Deadly force is advised.
No it's ill advised, no shots fired as yet everybody is still breathing, right now they are just an annoyance with guns.