It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Quake Watch 2016

page: 35
<< 32  33  34    36  37  38 >>

log in


posted on May, 20 2016 @ 05:32 PM
New feature on Geonet "Quick Felt Reports"

posted on May, 20 2016 @ 06:15 PM
a reply to: muzzy

I did look at The overall history of Australia.

I think it's interesting because it seems that N/S fault is so close.

I have never really looked at Australia as a tectonic landmass.

I have some good reading to do.

Thanks Muzzy.

posted on May, 20 2016 @ 06:16 PM

originally posted by: muzzy
New feature on Geonet "Quick Felt Reports"

Omg. How cool, and yet how.....

Do other counties have this? that you are aware of?
edit on 20-5-2016 by crappiekat because: to add, very tired

posted on May, 20 2016 @ 10:18 PM
a reply to: crappiekat
I have seen similar before, but they weren't part of an interactive page, more to do about explaining earthquake intensity
not sure if it was Mexico or some where they wrote in Spanish, I can't open Mexico SSN at the moment to look.
I think Canada EQ has the same type of cartoon somewhere on their site.
JMA have a picture scale pdf
in English
I guess it is good to help explain it if you don't speak the language
web page

edit on 0500000014014016 by muzzy because: (no reason given)

posted on May, 20 2016 @ 10:25 PM
Update on Central Ranges, Northern territory
6.1, 3.6, 3.4, 3.3, 3.8, 3.0, 3.4, 2.9, 2.7, 2.8, 2.8, 2.8, 3.5, 3.1

edit an hour or so later:
interesting, they must be reviewing the data, 3 new events inserted
6.1, 3.6, 3.4, 3.3, 3.8, 3.0, 3.4, 2.9, 2.7, 2.8, 2.8, 2.8, 3.0, 2.5, 3.1, 3.5, 3.1
edit on 0500000014014016 by muzzy because: edit an hour or so later

edit 30 minutes after first edit;
My Bing Map version

edit on 0500000014114116 by muzzy because: (no reason given)

posted on May, 21 2016 @ 12:49 AM
addendum to: muzzy post
ran out of time

I did a file covering "The Center" back in 2013 after that 5.7 near the SA border, file has 2697 events on it so I can't really "Bing it"
Here is the file anyway, highest 200 in the Center. If you have Google Earth you could use this link

another Bing Map, I expanded the search area a bit CentralRanges-Uluru History, 165 events, earliest recorded in this area 1971. But bet the Aborigines would have some earlier stories to tell.
edit on 0500000014114116 by muzzy because: more info

FWIW that 2013 5.7 I mentioned has since been downgraded to 5.4Mwp.
edit on 0500000014114116 by muzzy because: (no reason given)

posted on May, 21 2016 @ 12:41 PM
update on: Central Ranges,NT post
25 new events overnight
Links on above post are updated

posted on May, 21 2016 @ 11:35 PM
Duplications of Lat/Long are driving me crazy.
Not just at Mt. Holdsworth, but on some of the old data I have gathered for the Strongest Quakes blog.
I started going through and changing to the square icons @ 1867. Thats all good.
But when I attempted 1868 I found 3 duplicates

So what to do, only one event shows on the popup tag from the icon.
It works OK if you use the list on the left, but that's probably not everyones method of viewing, so ...........
In the "About" page a new *

* Note on Lat/Long Locations
On some of the older years maps (e.g. 1868) there are several separate events which have the same latitude/longitude, this is partly due to poor detail in the data. They may in fact have been at the exact same location, but it is unlikely. Because the square icons are 50% opacity these will show on the Bing interactive map as 100% opacity. But only one event will show on the popup tag when you click on the icon. For clarification on the maps I have added 0.0001 to both Lat and Long on one of the dual events, so that in maximum zoom (down to 100ft) the two icons split apart and you can click on the icon for details.

Using the list on the left works better though

I don't think 0.0001 degrees should make that much difference, shucks even EMSC only uses 2 decimal points, and they never agree with USGS as to the location anyway.

I reckon Captain Cook would have been able to handle it, if I sent him across the World to a point that was 100ft out I don't think he would be too pissed off and have me lashed on the mast. (watched a doco about him last night, what a guy)

edit on 0500000014214216 by muzzy because: I'm trying to streamline things right across the board, incl. only making one map, which can be of use as the map to enter Bing maps and also the thumbnail for the Flipcard style.

Yeah found another duplicate, South of Panama 1871, a 7.0 and a 6.5 which were 3 months apart, but right on top of each other. I split those by 100ft too. 1871? South of Panama? Panama was a department of Colombia then, didn't become a country of its own until 1903.
edit on 0500000014214216 by muzzy because: (no reason given)

posted on May, 23 2016 @ 11:49 PM
Some of the earlier events are now reviewed. 51 aftershocks so far
Main shock 6.1Mw, 6.4Ms, 6.1ML
Locations changed from Central Ranges, Northern Territory to Petermann Ranges, NT.

posted on May, 24 2016 @ 11:22 AM
ATS search will not work at all now for me.
never did find stuff!
and Google only founf one relevant item.

in the last two days the north pole had two quakes at 4.7.
why nothing in the news?
not some thing that happens every 6 years?

one post on ATS about pole jump.
did I miss any other info?
and can you say more one this please?

posted on May, 24 2016 @ 11:35 AM
a reply to: buddha

Could you please show a link for these earthquakes?

I have checked sources and I find no earthquakes for the North pole.

This one today in Alaska.
edit on 24-5-2016 by crappiekat because: to add link

I also found these.
edit on 24-5-2016 by crappiekat because: to add link

posted on May, 24 2016 @ 01:25 PM
a reply to: crappiekat

think he is meaning these?

4.7 North of Severnaya Zemlya 2016-05-22 08:40:41 UTC-05:0010.0 km

4.7 North of Severnaya Zemlya 2016-05-21 20:06:23 UTC-05:0015.3 km

There are eq frequent in the area did a search back to 1800

posted on May, 25 2016 @ 12:02 AM
a reply to: lurksoften
nice search result

some biggies in there, 1959, 2005 and 2008

edit on 0500000014514516 by muzzy because: (no reason given)

posted on May, 25 2016 @ 12:14 AM
couple more NT Au. last 24hrs
2016-05-24 15:20:00, -25.436, 129.776, 3.3, 5.0 Petermann Ranges. Nt.
2016-05-24 09:11:02, -25.904, 129.709, 3.1, 3.0 Petermann Ranges. Nt.

edit on 0500000014514516 by muzzy because: (no reason given)

posted on May, 25 2016 @ 12:49 AM
ID: 2016p390950 Network: geonet
Status: confirmed
Date/Time NZST: 25/05/2016 03:38:11
Date/Time UTC: 24/05/2016 15:38:11
Latitude, Longitude: -39.4634, 176.9066
Magnitude: 4.25M
Depth: 12.13 km
Energy Released: 35.7362 tonnes of TNT
Location: Napier-Hawkes Bay
Intensity Reports
strong 3
moderate 44
light 576
weak 12
Total 635
Black Stump Farm siesmograph
Just north of the Port, 5 aftershocks, 4x2's and a 1.83 across the bay and the swamp and airport which lifted up out of the sea in 1931 M7.4 quake
Ref: 2178228
Lat/Long: -39.3, 177
Date/Time UTC: 02/02/1931 22:47:00
Depth: 20 km
Mag: 7.4 ML
Location: 868 Aropaoanui Road, Tangoio 4181
aftershocks same location::
utc, mag, lat, long, depth
02/02 22:55:00, 6.0, -39.3, 177, 25
03/02 08:41:00, 6.0, -39.3, 177, 25
08/03 11:50:00, 6.0, -39.3, 177, 25
and then the
Ref: 2178232
Lat/Long: -39.5, 177.5
Date/Time UTC: 13/02/1931 01:27:00
Depth: 30 km
Mag: 7.3 ML
Location: Hawke Bay

edit on 0500000014514516 by muzzy because: (no reason given)

posted on May, 25 2016 @ 08:26 AM
a reply to: lurksoften

Well I'll be..

Definitely great work on your part.

I could not find those.

If you have time, could you explain to me how you found those?

I was looking for "Northpole Region earthquakes" and I tried it a couple other ways. I don't remember how I worded it.
edit on 25-5-2016 by crappiekat because: too add

posted on May, 25 2016 @ 12:02 PM
a reply to: crappiekat

If you Use Earthquake 3D and look 3 and 3 1/2 day ago.
its at a Supervolcano! BIG! its UNnamed.
sorry its a program you install.
you will seem them very close to the noth pole. two at "4.7".
* youtube Supervolcano!
duchsine ?

finding more now? search yahoo. Earthquake north pole.
its not just me!

oh! and on Earthquake 3D it has a LOT more than normal quakes!
Please! watch the first Link from 4:30. he does good quake post Too.

hes saying he found pumping and fraking at quake sites?
and one was said to be a quarry blast.
he could not find any quarry at site.

makes Me think US is making medium quakes?

edit on 25-5-2016 by buddha because: why not

posted on May, 25 2016 @ 05:29 PM
a reply to: crappiekat

Well when he said 4.7 and northpole i was just assuming he meant those two quakes. Because i have USGS tab set on 2.5 worldwide past 7days and those were the only two showing up there. Than went to search the archives. It lets you draw a rectangle on the map which i did in that area. Set Mag to 2.5 - 8 and time from 1800 to present. Clicked search and took me to that map (sometimes it takes awhile to load depending on area and how far back you choose).

posted on May, 25 2016 @ 06:01 PM
It's doesn't seem busy. I wouldn't even pipe up, but, Mexico isn't showing any earthquakes on their page. It's broken. I feel blind. I had been watching that one in particular, and now it's not there. It was one of the few places that was still busy. Now, I'll lose the "feel' for what's normal on a daily basis. Oh well, The other swarms in Nevada are still going but very small by comparison to earlier. Otherwise, yes, Greece and thereabouts seemed to have a small uptick recently. I hate saying it, if we wake up tomorrow, and Turkey has had a big one, there should be no surprise. Please don't think I'm forgetting Nepal, but if you are talking about the "Middle East", mainly Iran, and around Turkey/Greece, overall, I would have to say, that area "is too quiet".

posted on May, 25 2016 @ 10:07 PM
Dang it. The window for edits closed. As soon as I said the areas I check are quiet. Nicaragua comes back to life. And I wouldn't have even wrote anything except it's right under Conception. A big volcano. Earthquakes may be on a down tick lately, but as for volcanoes, there seems to be an uptick. Hmmm. Seems backward. Nonetheless. Here's the thing. They keep saying these earthquakes, and the volcanoes of Nicaragua are not connected. Well again, observation shows this ain't true. I've been watching for I think a year now. And a bit before that. Many of the volcanoes were restless and erupting at about the same time. Then, as I watched, they all quieted down. There was little bits of small stuff, but overall, there was an obvious drop-off with eruptions, but also, there was a very noticeable drop off in earthquakes. Again, how can we keep saying coincidence.

Up until this Conception earthquake, I thought I was watching paint dry, and really wondering why I'm watching. But that's the point really. I have to watch even when it's really slow. Otherwise, I'd miss the general trend that show this basic stop to all the Nicaraguan activity. Even Telica's tremor is lower and Negro is slowed, etc.

Earthquakes, and volcanoes, cluster and this means in a larger context there is a connection and it is more than just local stresses.

It was not a shallow earthquake though. Deep. Magma

top topics

<< 32  33  34    36  37  38 >>

log in