It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Latest really cool looking Mars rock

page: 1
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 30 2015 @ 01:38 AM
link   
This latest Mars rock formation is pretty cool looking, not only can I see the "Mesopotamian" face and beard but, also perhaps a stack of skulls/faces beneath it.

link




posted on Dec, 30 2015 @ 01:39 AM
link   
a reply to: abe froman


edit on 30-12-2015 by abe froman because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 30 2015 @ 01:42 AM
link   
a reply to: abe froman

Its an interesting "anomally"...but...sumerian ???




posted on Dec, 30 2015 @ 01:44 AM
link   
a reply to: abe froman

Neat.

I think it either looks like a guy melting into the rock, or a giant slug monster eating him feet 1st.



posted on Dec, 30 2015 @ 01:48 AM
link   
It looks like a Steampunk (goggles on his head) rendition of Jesus with skulls dripping down the rock...

Weird for sure!!



posted on Dec, 30 2015 @ 01:48 AM
link   
a reply to: watchitburn

You forgot to mention...a sumerian slug monster



posted on Dec, 30 2015 @ 01:58 AM
link   
These new photo shop ones are a joke. Stupidly definitive photos now. How can people believe this latest craze.



posted on Dec, 30 2015 @ 02:09 AM
link   
a reply to: rossacus

Photoshop ?

You should really think before you exhale.



posted on Dec, 30 2015 @ 02:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: abe froman
This latest Mars rock formation is pretty cool looking, not only can I see the "Mesopotamian" face and beard but, also perhaps a stack of skulls/faces beneath it.

link



No link back to nasa orginal image, no way of verifying if the sole pic on disclose tv site is real or fake. Cant put much weight on this I'm afraid, it might be an 'entertainment' article.



posted on Dec, 30 2015 @ 02:17 AM
link   
a reply to: Azureblue

I doubt its faked, cos ive seen similar ones in the past.

But you're right...we need a source.



posted on Dec, 30 2015 @ 02:23 AM
link   
a reply to: Azureblue

Here is the link to orig nasa image

mars.jpl.nasa.gov...

It looks less impressive without highlights.



posted on Dec, 30 2015 @ 02:24 AM
link   
a reply to: MarioOnTheFly

Itty bitty little guy.
Ain't it.



posted on Dec, 30 2015 @ 02:26 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

What do you mean ?

Its the right image... i found the "artifact" in question.

Edit:


Sorry
no question mark confused me.
edit on 30-12-2015 by MarioOnTheFly because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 30 2015 @ 02:28 AM
link   
a reply to: MarioOnTheFly

I know. Me too. It's really small.



posted on Dec, 30 2015 @ 02:29 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Indeed.

2nd.



posted on Dec, 30 2015 @ 02:31 AM
link   
a reply to: MarioOnTheFly

I think by Photoshop he means it has been highlighted to bring out the features....

....In my opinion that is a bad thing, pareidolia can be bad enough without adding to it.

Kangaruex4Ewe's steampunk Jesus is quite apt though.

edit on 30/12/15 by woogleuk because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 30 2015 @ 02:33 AM
link   
a reply to: woogleuk

Well...you might be right...in the end i see no harm if the original image url is provided.



posted on Dec, 30 2015 @ 02:36 AM
link   
a reply to: MarioOnTheFly

Oh I agree, and to be honest I prefer the original images, especially when they do look like something else.

Highlighting stuff just gives an unnecessary false impression.



posted on Dec, 30 2015 @ 02:45 AM
link   
a reply to: woogleuk




Highlighting stuff just gives an unnecessary false impression.

On the contrary, it gives an entirely necessary false impression.



posted on Dec, 30 2015 @ 02:52 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Ok guys...but sometimes i like the highlight...to see what the author sees...coupled with the original url...one can then determin if the highlight is fetecious in nature.

In this case...it slightly is




top topics



 
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join