It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: redchad
So it's the Marduk fan club! Says it all really I was very careful not to be OTT with my first post seems you have some influential friends. To have criticism or challenge removed is what you do im OK with it because at least I know you read it.
originally posted by: Marduk
originally posted by: Rapha
And with 33 (triple sin + unclean trinity) and 13 (rebellion) being mentioned, its no coincidence that an illuminated one from Cambridge glorified your ego.
Wow I am quite surprised that the people of faith have so much to say in this thread, I'm looking forwards to contacting you on Feb 9th Rapha and blowing a raspberry at your earlier claim about that day before when you claimed "the fun will really begin".
Have you arranged a bouncy castle yet ?
And Faith I have to tell you, is about the worst thing you can deliver your cognitive ability over to, because faith is the end of learning.
originally posted by: Kukri
I do agree with you so an S&F for that.
Regarding the arrogant and conceited tone of your OP! Not very impressed, but i see it throughout your OP's and replies. Methinks you should moderate your ego a little better going forward as it may be hindering your path to enlightenment.
No offence meant merely an observation
originally posted by: Marduk
originally posted by: Kukri
I do agree with you so an S&F for that.
Regarding the arrogant and conceited tone of your OP! Not very impressed, but i see it throughout your OP's and replies. Methinks you should moderate your ego a little better going forward as it may be hindering your path to enlightenment.
No offence meant merely an observation
None taken
I'm not on a path to enlightenment, I use this tone for a reason, want to know why that is ?
originally posted by: Kukri
Ok Marduk I'll bite. Why do you communicate in such a way?
I'm not here for the popularity contest
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: Marduk
I'm not here for the popularity contest
But of course you are...you wasted everyones time with a thread like this
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Jeff Bridges found in ancient stonehenge grave
when in fact the face looked more like Heath Ledger
originally posted by: Gh0stwalker
Is it not possible that Woolley and Kramer were biased in their analysis? Perhaps their education didn't allow for the ancient
alien theory, so they rationalized everything from a traditional stand point.
There's far more evidence in favour of extraterrestrial intervention than simply what Sitchin wrote about. What about the ancient megalithic sites like Tihuanaco’ and Sacsayhuaman in Peru, which even by today's standards we could not replicate? Or the Sumerian texts which describe in vivid detail man's creation in "clay pots"?
To base your entire belief system off one man's analysis is pretty absurd, and in my opinion you were asking for disappointment. Keep an open mind, but not so much that your brain falls out...
I for one am quite convinced that human evolution was manipulated by extraterrestrials. There are far too many ancient accounts which confirm it to ignore. Far too many unexplained structures and ancient sites which defy all logic. Though most of all, far too much of human history has been hidden or lost to convince me otherwise, and until that history is fully revealed I'm sticking with it.
Is it not possible that Woolley and Kramer were biased in their analysis? Perhaps their education didn't allow for the ancient alien theory,