It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
That's where I think a primary-school course on gun safety and responsibility would come in handy.
Still, I believe a fair majority of the pro-gun faction still understands the necessity of a culture that respects what guns represent and teaches that respect to its children.
Hmm. I think it may be the opposite, actually. If you are talking about the anti-regulation bunch. "I dont' care how much sense it makes. It's against the Constitution."
Everyone is concerned about the guns themselves rather than what they symbolize.
But apparently a good number (if ATS could be considered representative of the general population) say that it is a violation of Constitutional rights to place any requirements on gun ownership.
Hmm. I think it may be the opposite, actually. If you are talking about the anti-regulation bunch. "I dont' care how much sense it makes. It's against the Constitution."
A general outlook consistent with a conspiracy theorist world view.
Fair enough. You said "it would come in handy."
Did I list it as being a requirement for gun ownership?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Murgatroid
...
Citizens with hand weapons and long guns are not going to stop a modern war-machine, should one turn its baleful eye upon us.
I mean, let's get real.
I do believe a class on gun safety/respect for primary school children could go a long way to reducing the accidental deaths, if not the suicide or crime rates.
originally posted by: Eilasvaleleyn
a reply to: BIGPoJo
And it is those military personnel that break ranks who would win any potential civil-war type scenario.
Relatively untrained civilians would be minor support at best, cannon fodder as a middle ground, active hindrances at worst.