It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: JackHill
You can question the 'methods' used by some researchers,
Not only can you question the 'methods', you can also show how the 'methods' used are entirely worthless.
but you cannot explain the patterns, specialy in times where the internet or cable TV didn't exist.
The 'patterns' are readily explainable since you have 'researchers' using questionable and worthless 'methods' as you pointed out in the first part of your sentence. No need to bring up cable TV.
And no, you cannot blame the 'TV and books', generally people isn't that stupid.
heh...
And no, not every detailed account was obtained using hypnosis techniques.
No, they were obtained using questionable methods.
Here is the thing with hypnosis. At one time hypnosis was accepted by main stream psychology as a legitimate technique for recovering blocked memories. Because of that, Abduction researchers began using hypnosis as well and all the "researchers" were bragging about how many people they hypnotically regressed. Later on when psychology established that hypnosis was entirely useless as a memory recovery technique, the abduction researchers started claiming that some people freely recalled accounts. But the real problem is that it doesn't matter since you don't necessarily need to put someone under hypnosis in order to lead them into remembering something that's false. It really comes down to the researchers questionable techniques in general, as you pointed out. Hypnosis isn't the real issue, its the "researchers".
....and "memories recovered under hypnosis" is absolutely 100% the foundation of every claim made by abduction researchers, which is why abduction research has failed so miserably.
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
Some subjects are so ludicrous that they're deserving of ridicule...
originally posted by: JackHill
Yep, the usual suspects ridiculing the whole subject, as usual.
Prove it.
Yes, there are aliens abducting human beings. Yes, they are NOT human. Yes, there is obviously an agenda behind. Yes, hybrid beings have been created.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
I agree, but we also reach the point of why. Why would a advance alien race that can do all of this and more want to? Seems like a lot of work around goals that would be obsolete for them with the level of technology they would have, so really little need to do it at all. I think about the time an alien race comes to us they do not need us or our planet for anything that they can do just as easily on their own.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
This is why I said you would have more luck with a grape vine and human hybrid than an alien human hybrid because the alien would have zero common DNA with us.
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
So with this much physical contact and alien bukaki going on, why is there still no physical evidence? You can detect if someone was pregnant. There is zero evidence of any of this.
originally posted by: JackHill
How could you possibly know that, have you chatted with the little grey fellas?
originally posted by: JackHill
I mean, I just gave you a personal example, my father and his friend lost track of time and space for several hours just before seeing a 'light' coming from the horizon. Again, the same pattern, over and over again: a 'light' around/in the sky/etc, lost of time completely unexplainable, being in a place and not remembering how you got there, oh and yeah, it happened at TWO PEOPLE AT THE SAME TIME. Some others are able to remember parts of the missing time, WITHOUT hypnosis. Oh but no, we just gotta to ignore those folks because, you know, there are 'bad' investigators around (??) and you know, there are TV and books and, well, they just read some cheap sci-fi and are just confused (??), or well, hell, nothing seems to explain these cases, so uhmm, yeah, f* it, they're just lying... Nope, try again.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: JackHill
How could you possibly know that, have you chatted with the little grey fellas?
No need to, when it comes to DNA there needs to be a common ancestor between two species to get a hybred. I'm not sure of your question though, are you asking why do I know their DNA is different?
originally posted by: trueskepticnumberone
I always have to laugh at the "experts" who tell us that alien human hybridization can't happen, when it has been happening for decades now.
I guess the aliens never got your edict that it was impossible, fella.
Lol, and why is it always the people who tell us aliens aren't here who insist they know exactly what aliens are capable of?
That seems more than a little delusional.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: trueskepticnumberone
I always have to laugh at the "experts" who tell us that alien human hybridization can't happen, when it has been happening for decades now.
I guess the aliens never got your edict that it was impossible, fella.
Lol, and why is it always the people who tell us aliens aren't here who insist they know exactly what aliens are capable of?
That seems more than a little delusional.
Lol really, that is rich.
So Humans share 90% DNA with Chimps and our DNA is not close enough to make a hybred. Humans and cow 85%, chicken 65%, Bee 44%, Yeast 18%...and so on
So what happens when a alien with 0% like DNA try to make a hybred with humans?
originally posted by: trueskepticnumberone
Lol, that is rich...now you're telling us about alien DNA.
Why is it always the ones who haven't even figured out that aliens have been here for decades are the same geniuses that can tell us all about what aliens can do, and what they are, right down to their DNA?
What a joke.
And by the way, the word is "hybrid"', Mr. Science. Maybe we could take you more seriously if you knew what words you were using.
originally posted by: trueskepticnumberone
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: trueskepticnumberone
I always have to laugh at the "experts" who tell us that alien human hybridization can't happen, when it has been happening for decades now.
I guess the aliens never got your edict that it was impossible, fella.
Lol, and why is it always the people who tell us aliens aren't here who insist they know exactly what aliens are capable of?
That seems more than a little delusional.
There's nothing wrong with what he's said he's just made a perfectly good point. Also, I can't see why 'figuring out' that aliens have been here for decades (something you can't prove) makes you qualified to say what their DNA make up is (I'm guessing you haven't taken samples and had them tested so it's also something you can't prove).
Lol really, that is rich.
So Humans share 90% DNA with Chimps and our DNA is not close enough to make a hybred. Humans and cow 85%, chicken 65%, Bee 44%, Yeast 18%...and so on
So what happens when a alien with 0% like DNA try to make a hybred with humans?
Lol, that is rich...now you're telling us about alien DNA.
Why is it always the ones who haven't even figured out that aliens have been here for decades are the same geniuses that can tell us all about what aliens can do, and what they are, right down to their DNA?
What a joke.
And by the way, the word is "hybrid"', Mr. Science. Maybe we could take you more seriously if you knew what words you were using.
originally posted by: JackHill
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
So with this much physical contact and alien bukaki going on, why is there still no physical evidence? You can detect if someone was pregnant. There is zero evidence of any of this.
There have beed several cases where the fetus is extracted around 2-3 months after conception. No trace left behind. A miscarriage is always the supposed culprit, but hey, the fetus isn't to be found anywhere near!
originally posted by: Xtrozero
I know there is like 15 million but I do not see them taking over America. They are some mean ass picking machines though that border on super powers, so they do have us beat there.
originally posted by: Op3nM1nd3d
a reply to: Xtrozero
Well if there is such thing as "they", it is not necessary for them to adjust to our habitat. Two reasons.
1. they have never left and were original inhabitants of the planet and we are the hybrids or the new species that adapted to life here.
2. consciousness can be applied to earth`s biological/mechanical body...like in the film "the earth stood still".
Don`t know about you but for me it is not so hard not to believe this is possible. I`m actually quite fond of the "they live, we sleep" concept. I mean it would explain a lot of things if true..
originally posted by: beenharmed
Do some research and you find evidence that ancient human beings natural to Earth lived millions of years ago.
They did it by converting the nuclear crystal of stone.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: beenharmed
Do some research and you find evidence that ancient human beings natural to Earth lived millions of years ago.
How does evolution stop? We are 6 million years separated from Chimps, so when you say human like millions of years ago that to me is like saying evolution stopped when it came to use and "them".
BTW what evidence. Millions of years ago would still have evidence all over the place, but it is not there. Do you think if we were wiped back 2 millions years that all of this on earth would disappear in 10 million years? If you said 2 billion I would agree that it would be hard to show proof, but millions naw we would see it.
They did it by converting the nuclear crystal of stone.
So why can't we do the same, what is it that prevents us from doing the same? This would all be science not like it would be hard for us to figure out.