 |
reply posted on 15-1-2005 @ 12:02 PM by pedigreechum
|
Hey "Trickmastertrick",
Good luck in your attempt to disprove me. Haha. You people are relentless aren't you? What the heck do you do for a living? There is no way you
stumbled upon this picture unless you're in my unit. This picture was taken on scene by one of my friends (in another platoon). He was the first to
his truck and give him medical attention before he was airlifted out! So honestly, stop lying.
And by the way...What you see on the top right of the truck is a 3-tube part of the smoke system, and behind that is the condensor for the add-on A/C
system.
[edit on 15-1-2005 by pedigreechum]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-1-2005 @ 12:23 PM by Simulacra
|
I've been following this thread for a while now. Nice job pedigreechum. At least you provided some evidence (or at least attempted to) unlike most
claims made here. Some people might be eating their own words.
I never discredited you being in Iraq however I still unsure about you finding Red Mercury with an english label for a russian substance
in iraq
[edit on 1/15/2005 by Simulacra]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-1-2005 @ 12:35 PM by djohnsto77
|
He sent an e-mail with his pics, I saw his IP and think it's inconclusive, he may very well be in Iraq. I give him the benefit of the doubt as far as
that is concerned.
[edit on 1/15/2005 by djohnsto77]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-1-2005 @ 01:07 PM by Solarity
|
someone can to post his IP here or U2U it to me and I will have a quick check
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-1-2005 @ 01:28 PM by MacKiller
|
Originally posted by Solarity
someone can to post his IP here or U2U it to me and I will have a quick check 
No.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-1-2005 @ 01:40 PM by MacKiller
|
Two questions?
1. What kind of connection do you have in Iraq?
2. Have you even been to Italy?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-1-2005 @ 02:15 PM by djohnsto77
|
Originally posted by MacKiller
Two questions?
1. What kind of connection do you have in Iraq?
2. Have you even been to Italy? 
I've got another one, does smekkawi mean anything to you?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-1-2005 @ 03:04 PM by infinite8
|
Can you tell us any more of the information you found along with this Red Mercury. There are many reasons why it may have been baring an english
label "Red Mercury" so I wouldn't doubt that. What I find additionally interesting are the laminated documents found along side the nuclear
material.
By the way here is a a thread I posted last year on Red Mercury and the intercept of a purchase for over $541,000 per Kg. In addition, this article
mentions the fact that over a ton of red mercury was was "lost track of" by Special Ops in Iraq. Read up, you'll be interested to learn about this
substance as well as its power. Imagine a nuclear bomb the size of a softball.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-1-2005 @ 03:36 PM by ZeroDeep
|
Follow me on this one:
Why would a Russian originated chemical
Have an English title
if it was in Iraq?

I second that motion, and was about to state the very same thing. Good on you for pointing out the fundamental flaw in his 'so-called' proof.
This man/women is to ambigious and pics from Iraq can be found on a plethora of internet sites.
Deep
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-1-2005 @ 04:26 PM by pedigreechum
|
OK....I'm finished posting anything else about this! You (most) people are being rediculous. You'd try to prove a scandle/consriracy if I said
that I slept on my right side and didn't snore. What if I got on webcam and showed you my squad's AT-4, m-16's,240-b's, .50 cal's, mk-19's, gas
masks-You'd still probably come up with something stupid. If you want to talk about this anyfurther then send an U2U.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-1-2005 @ 04:33 PM by infinite8
|
I believe this to be completely true, but I do not know if we will ever hear about this in the media regardless of whether it was intended for use as
a WMD against our troops in Iraq. I think it will be kept quiet, at least for a very long time.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-1-2005 @ 09:57 PM by Simulacra
|
pedigreechum said that he wasn’t going to post on this thread anymore and was just going to answer questions through U2U. So I asked him about the
English label and he responded:
We also wondered why it was written (typed) in english. The funny thing is.........is that it seemed to have a lot of grammatical errors. Our guess
was that it was in english is because every country has people who know english so it is sort of a broadbase language. You'd be amazed by the high
number of people in this country that know english. All of our interpretors are hired local nationals. They start teaching the kids english in school!

You got to give it to the guy, at least he’s consistent.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-1-2005 @ 11:43 PM by Linux
|
The funny thing is that even if this guy was legit you'd never believe him. I'm not saying he's full of 100% truth at all. However in regards to
posting information, if I witnessed anything out of the ordinary I wouldn't post it here.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-1-2005 @ 02:39 AM by shbaz
|
With something like this, you can't ever be sure. It's the internet. If you met him in person, and he had pictures, you still couldn't be sure
because pictures can be photoshopped and some people have awesome poker faces.
If this is all true, it's a good thing you're not going to post anymore.. because if it is true, talking about this is in violation of your oath to
the USA. I hope for your sake your superiors don't find out about this if you're really a US soldier. I have a cousin who was in the navy in the
80's.. even now he won't talk about it because of the genuine threat of life imprisonment in a camp for people who talk too much. If I found out
about something like that, I wouldn't be able to keep my mouth shut either, honestly.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-5-2005 @ 07:27 PM by Forschung
|
I can't believe this. Pedigreechum finds a canister of red mercury and all you guys talk about is if he is in Iraq or not. Who cares? He may have
found a canister of red mercury and wants to know about it--ok?
I was hoping to discuss HOW red mercury works if someone is up for that but let's do first things first.
Red mercury is a compound of mercury. All compounds of mercury are solids. Red mercury is a viscous liquid which can be of any color from cherry red
to violet. How is this possible? I is possible because the solid powder is irradiated in a reactor and it is changed. How it is changed is what I
wanted to discuss but now we need to dispell rumors.
According to everything I have read, red mercury, once "energized" in a reactor is good, and liquid, or only about 3 month. So, it is entirely
possible that Pedigreechum found a casister of red mercury which was not dangerous in any way. It either was discharged or needed to be charged up
again.
The fact is that the US goverment hates the topic of red mercury and has gone to UFO-type lengths to discredit it and make it a laughing stock. The
very last thing the US goverment wants to happen is to find RM in Iraq.
Red mercury is an explosive in it's own right but that is not a nuclear explosion (I don't think ). It is a chemical explosion based on densified
material and a sudden release of energy following quantum theory. (Which I would like to discuss with everyone).
Pedigreechum's canister is probably not dangerous in itself and red mercury is not radioactive. It can be used to detonate both fission and fusion
devices and may have some other really cool uses. Red mercury can be used in WMDs but is not a WMD itself.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-5-2005 @ 08:34 PM by T_Jesus
|
I am a skeptic about what he claims, but instead of flaming him instantly, you should at least allow him to present his case. Perhaps if it were
explained to him that he should provide a convincing case, instead of saying "CHECK HIS IP! CHECK HIS IP!."
Oh well, I guess it doesn't matter regardless.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-5-2005 @ 11:03 PM by Forschung
|
Originally posted by T_Jesus
I am a skeptic about what he claims, but instead of flaming him instantly, you should at least allow him to present his case. Perhaps if it were
explained to him that he should provide a convincing case, instead of saying "CHECK HIS IP! CHECK HIS IP!."
Oh well, I guess it doesn't matter regardless. 
I couldn't agree with you more.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-5-2005 @ 11:21 PM by infinite8
|
I don't think anyone has heard from this guy since January. I would have loved to have heard more about this. If it was true, he was either scared
off completely or was told to keep quiet and let it blow over. Looks like we won't know now.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-6-2005 @ 10:11 PM by Forschung
|
Here are a couple internet articles which think the Iraqis actually had red mercury:
www.homlandsecruityus.net...
www.manuelsweb.com...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-6-2005 @ 01:02 AM by BigTrain
|
Does anyone know where this guy went. It seems kinda funny that not many people hear would want to hear more. Hes provided alot so far.
Train
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |