It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

#BlackLivesMatter Sets Up "Decoy" Protest in Attempt to Shut Down Airport

page: 20
37
<< 17  18  19    21  22  23 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 25 2015 @ 01:33 PM
link   
Many of these Black Lives Matter idiots could be mentally ill. The one who recently attempted to commit mass murder on the Vegas strip should be charged with terrorism. ~$heopleNation




posted on Dec, 25 2015 @ 01:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: JohnnyElohim

Martin luthor king did rallies inviting people to attend and hear him speak. He didn't try to prevent anyone from doing anything. And he never used violence as a means to accomplish his goals. Sad you don't seem to see the difference in non violent protests and trying to disrupt civil society.

If BLM wants to hold rallies they are free to do so. If they want to prevent people from being able to do things that is domestic terrorism. Less violent then blowing things up but the goals are the same. Get people to demand a change to prevent them from continuing.


You need citations for:

1) your assertion that MLK Jr's protests were never disruptive
2) the BLM movement endorsing violence (saying you haven't seen them publicly decry videos of angry individuals ranting is not sufficient)
3) your definition of domestic terrorism, which again, would include MLK Jr. and the Founding Fathers, both of whom who certainly did disrupt people's daily business in pursuit of their social and political ideals



posted on Dec, 25 2015 @ 02:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: SheopleNation
Many of these Black Lives Matter idiots could be mentally ill. The one who recently attempted to commit mass murder on the Vegas strip should be charged with terrorism. ~$heopleNation


90% of these "black lives matter" idiots as you call them are white.

So no surprise there. I saw what they did to Japan with the 2 atomic bombs on civilians - biggest act of terrorism in human history, this is nothing.



posted on Dec, 25 2015 @ 02:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: JohnnyElohim

originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: JohnnyElohim

Martin luthor king did rallies inviting people to attend and hear him speak. He didn't try to prevent anyone from doing anything. And he never used violence as a means to accomplish his goals. Sad you don't seem to see the difference in non violent protests and trying to disrupt civil society.

If BLM wants to hold rallies they are free to do so. If they want to prevent people from being able to do things that is domestic terrorism. Less violent then blowing things up but the goals are the same. Get people to demand a change to prevent them from continuing.


You need citations for:

1) your assertion that MLK Jr's protests were never disruptive
2) the BLM movement endorsing violence (saying you haven't seen them publicly decry videos of angry individuals ranting is not sufficient)
3) your definition of domestic terrorism, which again, would include MLK Jr. and the Founding Fathers, both of whom who certainly did disrupt people's daily business in pursuit of their social and political ideals


Your assertion that anyone who protests for human rights is "black lives matter" is equally troubling.

Get checked, pronto.



posted on Dec, 25 2015 @ 03:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: theySeeme
90% of these "black lives matter" idiots as you call them are white.


You must have bumped your head prior to making that delusional assumption, but yes there is a small minority of self hating white liberals who follow these imbeciles around like fools.


So no surprise there. I saw what they did to Japan with the 2 atomic bombs on civilians - biggest act of terrorism in human history, this is nothing.


There is another forum here on ATS if you care to discuss the events of the second World war and how uninformed you clearly are about its conclusion in the Pacific.

Stick to the topic of the thread now. ~$heopleNation



posted on Dec, 25 2015 @ 04:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: SheopleNation

originally posted by: theySeeme
90% of these "black lives matter" idiots as you call them are white.


You must have bumped your head prior to making that delusional assumption, but yes there is a small minority of self hating white liberals who follow these imbeciles around like fools.


So no surprise there. I saw what they did to Japan with the 2 atomic bombs on civilians - biggest act of terrorism in human history, this is nothing.


There is another forum here on ATS if you care to discuss the events of the second World war and how uninformed you clearly are about its conclusion in the Pacific.

Stick to the topic of the thread now. ~$heopleNation


I'll let the video that started this topic speak for itself.

www.youtube.com...



posted on Dec, 25 2015 @ 04:22 PM
link   
a reply to: theySeeme

What the members of the media, or the 3 or 4 misled rejects who are acting like deranged lunatics? Well you clearly have bumped your head then.

Try searching all of the various BLM protest videos that are all over the net and you may just comprehend that you're in error. ~$heopleNation



posted on Dec, 25 2015 @ 04:25 PM
link   
a reply to: JohnnyElohim

Show me a gathering by MLK where he tried to shut down something or disruot peoples lives. He didn't and actually its very offensive for you to invoke his name with no understanding of what he accomplished and how. Reality is had he berth disruptive he would have been thrown in jail because he was non violent they had to let him speak. And it was those speeches that changed the world. Had he done things like attempt to shuts down an airport we wouldn't even remeber him now.

As for the definition of a terrorist a person who uses terrorism in the pursuit of political aims.

And terrorism is the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes.

So when BLM says if we don't do what they want they make the threat they will shut down airports or even malls that is terrorism. IF BLM was smart they would stop letting progressives run the show we know terrorism was used by then in the past.
edit on 12/25/15 by dragonridr because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 25 2015 @ 04:36 PM
link   
a reply to: dragonridr

I'd call sit-ins a disruption and trying to shut down business as usual:



In October 1960 Atlanta student leaders convinced King to participate in a sit-in at Rich’s, a local department store. King and about 300 students were arrested. The students were later released, but King remained in jail while Georgia officials determined whether his sit-in arrest violated parole conditions King had received a month earlier after driving with a suspended license.

Link

It seems people forget the details...



posted on Dec, 25 2015 @ 04:50 PM
link   
I think this guy has it right when he suggests BLM shutting "stuff" down is wrong (and this guy isn`t white!)....

www.youtube.com...



posted on Dec, 25 2015 @ 04:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: dragonridr

I'd call sit-ins a disruption and trying to shut down business as usual:



In October 1960 Atlanta student leaders convinced King to participate in a sit-in at Rich’s, a local department store. King and about 300 students were arrested. The students were later released, but King remained in jail while Georgia officials determined whether his sit-in arrest violated parole conditions King had received a month earlier after driving with a suspended license.

Link

It seems people forget the details...


It seems it's YOU who forgets the details, like the detail on the link you provided that says




The sit-ins started on 1 February 1960, when four black students from North Carolina A&T College sat down at a Woolworth lunch counter in downtown Greensboro, North Carolina. The students—Joseph McNeil, Izell Blair, Franklin McCain, and David Richmond—purchased several items in the store before sitting at the counter reserved for white customers.


reserved for white customers?

Anyway
edit on 25-12-2015 by theySeeme because: (no reason given)

edit on 25-12-2015 by theySeeme because: (no reason given)

edit on 25-12-2015 by theySeeme because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 25 2015 @ 04:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: theySeeme

originally posted by: JohnnyElohim

originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: JohnnyElohim

Martin luthor king did rallies inviting people to attend and hear him speak. He didn't try to prevent anyone from doing anything. And he never used violence as a means to accomplish his goals. Sad you don't seem to see the difference in non violent protests and trying to disrupt civil society.

If BLM wants to hold rallies they are free to do so. If they want to prevent people from being able to do things that is domestic terrorism. Less violent then blowing things up but the goals are the same. Get people to demand a change to prevent them from continuing.


You need citations for:

1) your assertion that MLK Jr's protests were never disruptive
2) the BLM movement endorsing violence (saying you haven't seen them publicly decry videos of angry individuals ranting is not sufficient)
3) your definition of domestic terrorism, which again, would include MLK Jr. and the Founding Fathers, both of whom who certainly did disrupt people's daily business in pursuit of their social and political ideals


Your assertion that anyone who protests for human rights is "black lives matter" is equally troubling.

Get checked, pronto.


Precisely where did I say that?



posted on Dec, 25 2015 @ 04:55 PM
link   
Yeah this has always been the way with protests, whether they're on public or private property. But now because it's black people they're terrorists?.....so very very pathetic...



posted on Dec, 25 2015 @ 05:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: JohnnyElohim

originally posted by: theySeeme

originally posted by: JohnnyElohim

originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: JohnnyElohim

Martin luthor king did rallies inviting people to attend and hear him speak. He didn't try to prevent anyone from doing anything. And he never used violence as a means to accomplish his goals. Sad you don't seem to see the difference in non violent protests and trying to disrupt civil society.

If BLM wants to hold rallies they are free to do so. If they want to prevent people from being able to do things that is domestic terrorism. Less violent then blowing things up but the goals are the same. Get people to demand a change to prevent them from continuing.


You need citations for:

1) your assertion that MLK Jr's protests were never disruptive
2) the BLM movement endorsing violence (saying you haven't seen them publicly decry videos of angry individuals ranting is not sufficient)
3) your definition of domestic terrorism, which again, would include MLK Jr. and the Founding Fathers, both of whom who certainly did disrupt people's daily business in pursuit of their social and political ideals


Your assertion that anyone who protests for human rights is "black lives matter" is equally troubling.

Get checked, pronto.


Precisely where did I say that?


Who said you said anything?



posted on Dec, 25 2015 @ 05:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Prezbo369
Yeah this has always been the way with protests, whether they're on public or private property. But now because it's black people they're terrorists?.....so very very pathetic...


Weird isn't it? I remember when the Occupy Wall Street protests kicked off, everyone on this forum was all for it, egging them on "They should shut down the bridges!" "Shut down the apple store!" Now, as you said, when black people do it we are terrorists. Just strange.



posted on Dec, 25 2015 @ 05:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: JohnnyElohim

Show me a gathering by MLK where he tried to shut down something or disruot peoples lives. He didn't and actually its very offensive for you to invoke his name with no understanding of what he accomplished and how. Reality is had he berth disruptive he would have been thrown in jail because he was non violent they had to let him speak. And it was those speeches that changed the world. Had he done things like attempt to shuts down an airport we wouldn't even remeber him now.


"I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action"; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a 'more convenient season.'"
― Martin Luther King Jr.

"You deplore the demonstrations taking place in Birmingham. But your statement, I am sorry to say, fails to express a similar concern for the conditions that brought about the demonstrations. I am sure that none of you would want to rest content with the superficial kind of social analysis that deals merely with effects and does not grapple with underlying causes. It is unfortunate that demonstrations are taking place in Birmingham, but it is even more unfortunate that the city’s white power structure left the Negro community with no alternative."
― Martin Luther King Jr.

MLK Jr's protests were enormously disruptive and criticized by people who sound much like you.



As for the definition of a terrorist a person who uses terrorism in the pursuit of political aims.

And terrorism is the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes.

So when BLM says if we don't do what they want they make the threat they will shut down airports or even malls that is terrorism. IF BLM was smart they would stop letting progressives run the show we know terrorism was used by then in the past.


Do you not understand that clogging up streets and walkways is not violence? Do you not understand that almost all nonviolent civil disobedience involves sit-ins, lie-ins, and other space-occupying gestures that inconvenience people's lives in an effort to draw attention to the issues they're protesting about? Do you not realize that BLM did not "threaten" to shut down an airport, but rather they feinted a protest at the Mall of American in order to be more effective in their airport protest?

Interfering with travel and commerce is not violence, is not terrorism.



posted on Dec, 25 2015 @ 05:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: theySeeme

originally posted by: JohnnyElohim

originally posted by: theySeeme

originally posted by: JohnnyElohim

originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: JohnnyElohim

Martin luthor king did rallies inviting people to attend and hear him speak. He didn't try to prevent anyone from doing anything. And he never used violence as a means to accomplish his goals. Sad you don't seem to see the difference in non violent protests and trying to disrupt civil society.

If BLM wants to hold rallies they are free to do so. If they want to prevent people from being able to do things that is domestic terrorism. Less violent then blowing things up but the goals are the same. Get people to demand a change to prevent them from continuing.


You need citations for:

1) your assertion that MLK Jr's protests were never disruptive
2) the BLM movement endorsing violence (saying you haven't seen them publicly decry videos of angry individuals ranting is not sufficient)
3) your definition of domestic terrorism, which again, would include MLK Jr. and the Founding Fathers, both of whom who certainly did disrupt people's daily business in pursuit of their social and political ideals


Your assertion that anyone who protests for human rights is "black lives matter" is equally troubling.

Get checked, pronto.


Precisely where did I say that?


Who said you said anything?


You said:

'Your assertion that anyone who protests for human rights is "black lives matter" is equally troubling.'

But I said no such thing. I'm not sure why you'd take my words to mean that.



posted on Dec, 25 2015 @ 05:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: JohnnyElohim

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: JohnnyElohim

originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Prezbo369





Yea lets not call an apple an apple.


You should probably supply context and sourcing for those photographs. One is of rioters in Baltimore in the wake of the Freddie Gray incident. The other is of FSA fighters in Syria. What is your point in comparing the two with no context or explanation?


Think they are trying to point out vandalism is another form if terrorism. It can be but not always depends on if it is intentional. For exmple trying to shut down an airport intentionally that is terrorism. But if a random riot broke out closing the airport the intent wasn't there. It was just a consequence of the riot. In the case of BLM they are intentionally trying to disrupt society in order to change policy. That is the very definition of a terrorist.


They might be trying to say that.

The two photos I posted were for contrast. Only one of them depicted "terrorists". You assumed they both did. Media has done it's job.



posted on Dec, 25 2015 @ 05:19 PM
link   
a reply to: MystikMushroom

Yes, but when MLK and others did it, they were directly protesting the part of the system that was wrong.

The lunch counters discriminated.

Show me where the mall and the shoppers are part of police brutality that BLM is claiming they are protesting.



posted on Dec, 25 2015 @ 05:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: JohnnyElohim

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: JohnnyElohim

originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Prezbo369





Yea lets not call an apple an apple.


You should probably supply context and sourcing for those photographs. One is of rioters in Baltimore in the wake of the Freddie Gray incident. The other is of FSA fighters in Syria. What is your point in comparing the two with no context or explanation?


Think they are trying to point out vandalism is another form if terrorism. It can be but not always depends on if it is intentional. For exmple trying to shut down an airport intentionally that is terrorism. But if a random riot broke out closing the airport the intent wasn't there. It was just a consequence of the riot. In the case of BLM they are intentionally trying to disrupt society in order to change policy. That is the very definition of a terrorist.


They might be trying to say that.

The two photos I posted were for contrast. Only one of them depicted "terrorists". You assumed they both did. Media has done it's job.


Neither of them depicted terrorists. Neither of them depicted BLM protestors.



new topics

top topics



 
37
<< 17  18  19    21  22  23 >>

log in

join