It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
we found many Ferguson police officers and
other City employees to be dedicated public servants striving each day to perform their duties
lawfully and with respect for all members of the Ferguson community
Blacks have a much higher percentage in these areas mainly inner cities. Meaning they do indeed get pulled over more often.
FPD reported 11,610 vehicle stops between October 2012 and October 2014. African Americans accounted for 85%, or 9,875, of those stops, despite making up only 67% of the population. White individuals made up 15%, or 1,735, of stops during that period, despite representing 29% of the population.
originally posted by: Phage
Nor was it claimed that the warrants were issued or fines compounded because she was black.
No, that example is from your source. Directly.
Yes. I know. It does not change the fact that the police stopped a disproportionate number of blacks as compared to whites.
It also starts out with this
African Americans are more than twice as likely as white drivers to be searched during vehicle stops even after controlling for non-race based variables such as the reason the vehicle stop was initiated, but are found in possession of contraband 26% less often than white drivers, suggesting officers are impermissibly considering race as a factor when determining whether to search.
They also constitute 87% of the stops.
Why? It doesn't say twice as many blacks were searched. It says that blacks are twice as likely to be searched. In spite of the fact that the searches of whites found contraband 74% more often than for blacks.
The two numbers will obviously coincide.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: dragonridr
Blacks have a much higher percentage in these areas mainly inner cities. Meaning they do indeed get pulled over more often.
Read this again:
FPD reported 11,610 vehicle stops between October 2012 and October 2014. African Americans accounted for 85%, or 9,875, of those stops, despite making up only 67% of the population. White individuals made up 15%, or 1,735, of stops during that period, despite representing 29% of the population.
If blacks accounted for 67% of stops, it would make sense. They don't.
If whites accounted for 29% of stops, it would make sense. They don't.
It is not proportionate to population.
Don't forget the 14% decrease, for whites.
The statistics are to simple so there appears to be an 8 percent increase over what you believe the norm should be.
Do you think this is due to racism meaning 8 percent of stops is because they are black??
You seem to be assuming that the stops were made in high crime areas.
Or do you think its because police patrol high crime areas?
originally posted by: Phage
You seem to be assuming that the stops were made in high crime areas.
No, I'm not. I know that 90% of the entire population is under 65 though. I know the median age is 36.4.
You seem to be assuming the white population of Ferguson is under 65, while I propose the opposite.
Why would you assume that?
If I look into statistics of crimes committed by senior citizens, and I assume the white population is retired we can really skew some stats.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: dragonridr
Don't forget the 14% decrease, for whites.
The statistics are to simple so there appears to be an 8 percent increase over what you believe the norm should be.
Do you think this is due to racism meaning 8 percent of stops is because they are black??
Is racial profiling the same thing as racism? If so, yes, I think it is a factor.
You seem to be assuming that the stops were made in high crime areas.
Or do you think its because police patrol high crime areas?
Are you sure about that?
Since most of the time police pull someone over they either they broke a traffic law or suspect drunk driving.
I think it's you who is being naive.
I don't think they care if they are black green or purple.