It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Aircraft picture quiz

page: 69
0
<< 66  67  68    70  71  72 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 16 2006 @ 07:14 AM
link   
Your detective processes are in good ordder guys and between you all you nearly got it, especially planeman.

Number 5 is the Myasischev M-28, it was intended to replace the Bison and match the payload range and performance of the B-52, it was cancelled in 1955 when it became clear that unavoidable risies in structure weight would not allow the necessary performance figures to be reached.




posted on Mar, 16 2006 @ 10:03 AM
link   
lol. Nice one!

Here are some more for your careful consideration (national marks etc edited out):
1.


2.


3.


4.


5.


6.



posted on Mar, 16 2006 @ 10:39 AM
link   
1. MiG-AT
2. Nord 1601
3. Hawkeye 2000
4. Beriev Be-103
5. SNCASO SO.8000 Narval
6. Yakovlev Yak-58



posted on Mar, 16 2006 @ 10:49 AM
link   
1 MiG AT

2 Nord 1601

3 can't remember

4 Beriev 103

5 Sud Oest Narval

6 No idea

LOL, it took me so long to try and remember no3 that wombats post went up 10 whole minutes before mine


I was thinking 'Russian design to be produced in China,' not Hawkeye, but I couldn't remember the name anyway.

[edit on 16-3-2006 by waynos]



posted on Mar, 16 2006 @ 11:01 AM
link   
Too late for this quizz, the third one I think is Yak-40 also called hawkeyeski, frankly I have no idea about FORTH and SIXTH. I think it is time for Wombat turn to post.

[edit on 16-3-2006 by emile]

[edit on 16-3-2006 by emile]



posted on Mar, 16 2006 @ 11:18 AM
link   
I think you're right emile - a veritable storm of prop blades there.... which would make it Yak-44..

I seem to pick such strange things to put up that only I can answer them:bnghd:



posted on Mar, 16 2006 @ 11:37 AM
link   
Oops I still type wrongly, factually it's Yak-44, which have no relative with Yak-44, you have good memorey Wombat


[edit on 16-3-2006 by emile]



posted on Mar, 16 2006 @ 11:44 AM
link   
Damn, you guys got those easy. I try to pick 'interesting' moreso than obscure. I might do a UAV special next.... or "famous hoaxes". Wombat got them all, and yes Yak-44 is correct.



posted on Mar, 16 2006 @ 11:46 AM
link   
Ah well, at least I remembered it was Russian


I didn't think it was a Hawkeye variant because of the cockpit glazing which is rounder and smoother than the Hawkeye's and I knew Russia had a project that was very similar but I wouldn't have remebered the name.

If there's going to be a UAV round I might sit it out, unless I get lucky.

[edit on 16-3-2006 by waynos]



posted on Mar, 16 2006 @ 12:12 PM
link   











posted on Mar, 16 2006 @ 01:07 PM
link   
1. “Aska” Japanese experimental STOL transport based on C-1
2. DeHaviland Mosquito with radial engines?
3. ? 1950s USAF bomber prototype, never saw service…
4. ?Vought?
5. ? Italian WWII fighter, probably a Fiat. Maybe a development of the G55?


[edit on 16-3-2006 by planeman]



posted on Mar, 16 2006 @ 02:24 PM
link   
Only one out of five planeman, plus a couple of half marks but I don't want to give wombat clues he doesn't really need,


1 is the NAL Aska STOL research transport



posted on Mar, 16 2006 @ 02:30 PM
link   
3= Martin XB-48 bomber which lost to Boeing's B-47.....



posted on Mar, 16 2006 @ 03:59 PM
link   
2. FMA IA.24 Calquin
4. Vultee Vanguard
5. Heinkel He 112
I'm working on a few quizzes which will be a bit more than just recognition, will be a few days.



posted on Mar, 16 2006 @ 04:33 PM
link   
1. A famous hoax. Name the aircraft this alleges to be:


2. A classic bit of mis-information. Which aircraft project was this thought to represent?


3. Was never to be,....


4. Unremarkable


5. Missed the boat....


6. Trust the British,..


7. Just plane cool!


[edit on 16-3-2006 by planeman]



posted on Mar, 16 2006 @ 05:50 PM
link   
1 I rememebr this, it was the 'Tu 180 stealth bomber' not very convincingly fashioned from a photo of the Tu160.

3 Wasn't this the indegenous Japanese design for the FS-X?

4 Fokker Mach trainer

5 Fokker D.23

7 I remember this as the 'Microjet 200' from the 1980's but it didn't have the vertical extentions on the tail, has the name changed?



posted on Mar, 16 2006 @ 06:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by waynos
1 I rememebr this, it was the 'Tu 180 stealth bomber' not very convincingly fashioned from a photo of the Tu160.

3 Wasn't this the indegenous Japanese design for the FS-X?

4 Fokker Mach trainer

5 Fokker D.23

7 I remember this as the 'Microjet 200' from the 1980's but it didn't have the vertical extentions on the tail, has the name changed?

1. Correct. Yes, it is unconvincing - I guess people believe what they want to believe.
3. Yep.
4. Yep.
5. Yep.
7. Yep. The small tail extension were just on the one prototype. I think the project died.



posted on Mar, 16 2006 @ 10:31 PM
link   
The 2nd mut be a model of layout before prototype of Mirage 2000!



posted on Mar, 17 2006 @ 09:02 AM
link   
Nope. Has a Mirage connection of sorts but isn't French.



posted on Mar, 19 2006 @ 07:30 AM
link   
It isn't Franch, must be India!



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 66  67  68    70  71  72 >>

log in

join