It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Aircraft picture quiz

page: 43
0
<< 40  41  42    44  45  46 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 18 2005 @ 09:11 PM
link   
C-95 is the Brazilian military designation for the Bandeirante. YC-95 was the designation for the Bandeirante prototype which had the EMBRAER designation EMB-110

[edit on 18-4-2005 by The Winged Wombat]




posted on Apr, 18 2005 @ 10:04 PM
link   
A new day, a new set:

1.


2.


3.


4.


5.



posted on Apr, 19 2005 @ 01:07 AM
link   
1. Kamov Ka-22 'Vintokry'
2. Chenghe Z-6
3. Polikarpov ITP
4. Arsenal VG.33
5. Ilyushin Il-18

[edit on 19/4/05 by The Winged Wombat]



posted on Apr, 20 2005 @ 05:17 PM
link   
So...where are the last posts...? where is my last set? what happened here????



posted on Apr, 20 2005 @ 08:31 PM
link   
Well, the post with my last set disappeared. Anyways, Winged Wombat answered all of them correct, but this one:



anyone?



posted on Apr, 22 2005 @ 10:24 PM
link   
Nobody there? Here´s another pic of the same aircraft...




posted on Apr, 23 2005 @ 12:43 PM
link   
Eureka!!!!!


FMA IA 37



posted on Apr, 23 2005 @ 10:18 PM
link   
Correct! The usually (wrongly) called Pulqui III.

Well done.



posted on Apr, 23 2005 @ 10:27 PM
link   
Does anyone have a picture or drawing of the Mitusbishi Ki-40 ?



posted on Apr, 24 2005 @ 07:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by The Winged Wombat
Does anyone have a picture or drawing of the Mitusbishi Ki-40 ?



According my knew this plane has never flew, even never be made maybe.
Did you have some evidence to prove it was made ever?



posted on Apr, 25 2005 @ 10:44 AM
link   
I am unsure as to whether the Ki-40 was built...

It was based on the unbuilt Ki-39 and abandoned in favour of the Ki-46

I was hoping that someone has a drawing of the beast !



posted on Apr, 25 2005 @ 11:26 AM
link   
OK, you'll have to bear with me as I'm not quite sure how to post pix, but I'll give it a try......

Let's see if anyone can identify these...


1.


2.


3.


4.


5.


Good luck

OK- finally got the idea - after a few edits!



[edit on 25/4/05 by The Winged Wombat]



posted on Apr, 25 2005 @ 12:23 PM
link   
very very good selection. Although I have seen those aircraft before I can only think of the name of one of them, and I'm unsure about that!

Think the helicopter is the Percival P.74 (although thinking about it the P.74 might have been the planned production version of that prototype) and one thing I do know for certain about it is that is was so feeble it failed to ever lift itself off the ground, also the test pilot was very unhappy about the fact that he would have to run the length of the fuselage to escape through a door at the back in an emergency!

I have seen a picture of the flying boat at the bottom in flight (if its the same one) with its distinctive tandem wing but I can't think of its name yet. Ah well thats enough excuses from me.



posted on Apr, 25 2005 @ 01:19 PM
link   
Well done waynos,

Percival P.74 is correct



posted on Apr, 25 2005 @ 11:39 PM
link   
The 1st looks like Cutiss XP-55 or CW-24 but I am not sure.
The last one certainly is Do.212
The middle one in which I am very interested, I waiting to see the end



posted on Apr, 26 2005 @ 03:53 AM
link   
Emile,

Yes the flying boat is the Dornier Do 212, but the first one is not a Curtiss, in fact it's not even American !

As a clue about the middle one (a triplane, biplane and monoplane in formation ?)..... the rudder shape is typical of the manufacturer.

[edit on 26/4/05 by The Winged Wombat]



posted on Apr, 26 2005 @ 07:16 AM
link   
1. SAI Ambrosini S.S.4
3. Fokker V.8... not a biplane, not a triplane...a quintuplane!!!

[edit on 26-4-2005 by Peronemlin]



posted on Apr, 26 2005 @ 09:02 AM
link   
Correct - which just leaves one......

er... that would be a quintuplane with a tail as opposed to a tailless quintuplane, I suppose



posted on Apr, 26 2005 @ 11:05 AM
link   
Could that last one be a variant of the Molniya 1? It has the same basic features but a sleeker nose than the prototype I remember.



posted on Apr, 26 2005 @ 11:42 AM
link   
My source photo is, indeed, captioned Molniya 1

Now I suppose that could be described as a three surface canard twin boom, folding wing configuration


Now if the mainplanes were swept forward a little........... the configuration would be longer than the aircraft




[edit on 26/4/05 by The Winged Wombat]



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 40  41  42    44  45  46 >>

log in

join