It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Catastrophic Attack that will disrupt the norm functioning ofthe USA-For boots tobe on ground in ME

page: 1
7

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 18 2015 @ 11:22 PM
link   
AT Some PR thing for journalists that wasn't supposed to be leaked.- I got this off of a BIN article.

"... he envisioned sending significant ground forces to the Middle East only in the case of a catastrophic terrorist attack that disrupted the normal functioning of the United States.” this is from the horses mouth (Obama).


SOOO then if the Industrial Military Complex wanted war because war = money - that being boots on the ground in the Middle East - whats to stop them from creating that scenario in the USA Just to Nudge Obama to authorize that to happen? We have already seen 2 Entire school systems shut down ,1 one for a hoax and the other for an assignment in class or home work i dunno which .

Isn't that disrupting the normal functioning of the USA ... small supposed isolated incidents but wait , that was only a test run i would think...
IF they want it bad enough it'll happen.

I put this in dreams and predictions BC im Predicting this Will Happen .What form it will take i dont know.




posted on Dec, 18 2015 @ 11:30 PM
link   
a reply to: GnosticMountain

i really wish would stop saying boots on the ground it some stupid catch phrase euphemism that caught on in the past 5-6 years which really just means invasion. And i dont know if anyone else has noticed but the phrase is becoming way to common on msm almost sounds like its becoming a "trigger phrase" for the sheeple



posted on Dec, 18 2015 @ 11:30 PM
link   
dp

edit on 18-12-2015 by DOCHOLIDAZE1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 18 2015 @ 11:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: DOCHOLIDAZE1
a reply to: GnosticMountain

i really wish would stop saying boots on the ground it some stupid catch phrase euphemism that caught on in the past 5-6 years which really just means invasion. And i dont know if anyone else has noticed but the phrase is becoming way to common on msm almost sounds like its becoming a "trigger phrase" for the sheeple


Goes back to world war 2 and the paratroopers.been around far longer then 5 or 6 years.



posted on Dec, 18 2015 @ 11:39 PM
link   
a reply to: dragonridr

read carefully i said catching on in the past 5 or six years not invented in the past 5-6 years



posted on Dec, 18 2015 @ 11:54 PM
link   
yes they are trigger words. Because you will hear them repeated in context exactly word for word across all affiliates and even competing news channels. Current known trigger words/phrases that I have detected include but not limited to:

*boots on the ground
*mass shooter and gun control (typically lumped together within the same sentence)
*red line, to cross the red line
*active shooter
*economic recovery (mostly false)
*officer will not be charged

These are ones that we can see be repeated over and over again reported word for word across all different channels and affiliates. It is the repetition which works to drive it home. It even gets printed exactly the same in most cases if its a national story.

Either way, I dont expect any boots on ground scenario. We lost Syria, its done. Time to focus on Afghanistan and exploit those minerals.



posted on Dec, 18 2015 @ 11:55 PM
link   
OK fine the phrase annoys you what about the actual post the content?? any thoughts on that instead of just whining about a phrase that the US President himself used? Do you think its possible?



posted on Dec, 18 2015 @ 11:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: DOCHOLIDAZE1
a reply to: GnosticMountain

i really wish would stop saying boots on the ground it some stupid catch phrase euphemism that caught on in the past 5-6 years which really just means invasion. And i dont know if anyone else has noticed but the phrase is becoming way to common on msm almost sounds like its becoming a "trigger phrase" for the sheeple


Anything to add other than watered down rhetoric..?

From OP:
this is from the horses mouth (Obama).

Yes, but don't you see the fallacy...?




posted on Dec, 19 2015 @ 12:02 AM
link   
a reply to: GnosticMountain

I don;t think we do BIN here. You also quoted without linking, but I don't think we link to BIN here. So you should find another source. Or just leave your prediction?


edit on 19-12-2015 by reldra because: (no reason given)

edit on 19-12-2015 by reldra because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 19 2015 @ 12:15 AM
link   
a reply to: GnosticMountain




Do you think its possible?


anything is possible




any thoughts on that instead of just whining about a phrase that the US President himself used?



i really dont care what phrases the president uses, his and the medias have the same writers.




OK fine the phrase annoys you what about the actual post the content??


content is vauge and just adds to a on going conversation that everyone has when they watch msm.

Im just pointing out the trigger words that they use, and how it is trickling down now to the sheeple.


edit on 19-12-2015 by DOCHOLIDAZE1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 19 2015 @ 12:28 AM
link   
a reply to: reldra

I think we can allow BIN to slide for a prediction thread, if not for anything than just to humor the prediction. I firmly believe and know that economic potential in Afghanistan is worth much more than a pipeline for the Saudis to Europe. Obviously the strategic significance of direct energy supplies from a NATO friendly ally to Europe is not lost when considering Russia has utilized this as a political and economic weapon before.

The cost of supporting the Saudis though is becoming to great now. I dont expect them to remain at the head of the UN Humans Rights Commission for long. Plus they have actually lost ground in southern Saudi to Yemeni opposition forces. I think the royals there know if they lose Yemen (already lost, they just refuse to admit it) they will literally have years before the uprising comes home to roost.

I mean I was watching a very American styled Iranian tv show today in English, that was exploring some interesting cultural entertainment history. The community was very vibrant and they visited a nice antique shop. Plus the women are actually given the liberty they deserve to speak their mind in Iran.

In the historical context, do we wish to be behind the brutal Saudi dictators, or an Islamic theocracy that can show the world it has clearly evolved past the Old World barbarian thinking imposed on the Saudi citizenry by their Monarchs?? The Europeans will get their pipeline, but I suspect it will be Eastern Block at the helm, not friends of NATO.

I dont care either way as energy security in Europe is not my concern. My Concern as an American capitalist will be to put my casino gambles at the New York/London/Hong Kong ETF's in the mining companies poised to exploit Afghanistan's mineral wealth. Big pharma has already been doing wonders for my portfolio since the open exportation of their opium has yielded record volume of sales and revenue of opiates drugs as the record level of corresponding addictions goes to show. Robotics will probably benefit as well once we can tap into those rare earths and lithium for more efficient power supplies.

No boots on ground in Syria. Kerry would not have allowed Assad to stay if that were the case.



posted on Dec, 19 2015 @ 01:23 AM
link   
"Ground Zero" my fave.........Ahem.



posted on Dec, 19 2015 @ 01:30 AM
link   
a reply to: GnosticMountain

? I don't get it? There are US soldiers in active combat in Afghanistan, ME, right? So you predict sthg that already happened?



posted on Dec, 19 2015 @ 02:07 AM
link   
OK how many are there right now in an active Combat role?



posted on Dec, 19 2015 @ 02:12 AM
link   
a reply to: GnosticMountain

A D D anyone?....AD what? ...oooh Shiny.....



posted on Dec, 19 2015 @ 02:22 AM
link   
a reply to: GnosticMountain

Why don't you research yourself? Something around 9000? But that's just from wiki.



posted on Dec, 19 2015 @ 02:43 AM
link   
a reply to: Peeple

Thank you for looking that up!! its late and im researching a different track.



new topics




 
7

log in

join