It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: xuenchen
You still can't show any clear and concise "sources" or even "definitions".
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: AngryCymraeg
Tell me another story.
And don't forget Senator Robert Byrd, his party got all choked up when he left this plain of existence.
originally posted by: Konduit
Socialism is 2 wolves and a sheep deciding on whats for dinner.
originally posted by: muse7
Im glad we have all these conservative scholars, who truly are the cream of the intellectual crop, lecturing us on what facism is.
A party governing a nation “totalitarianly" is a new departure in history. There are no points of reference nor of comparison. From beneath the ruins of liberal, socialist, and democratic doctrines, Fascism extracts those elements which are still vital. It preserves what may be described as "the acquired facts" of history; it rejects all else. That is to say, it rejects the idea of a doctrine suited to all times and to all people. Granted that the XIXth century was the century of socialism, liberalism, democracy, this does not mean that the XXth century must also be the century of socialism, liberalism, democracy. Political doctrines pass; nations remain. We are free to believe that this is the century of authority, a century tending to the " right ", a Fascist century.
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: neo96
To bad you didn't learn what fascism actually means. That would have helped a lot more in this discussion than your tangent about the 2nd.
I'm sure he has seen that before as well but, I'm also sure it doesn't matter.