It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Latest: Putin Q&A - Admits Russians participating in E. Ukraine in military capacity

page: 10
5
<< 7  8  9   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 4 2016 @ 11:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

You just showed yourself up bye bye




posted on Jan, 5 2016 @ 04:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: sosobad
a reply to: Xcathdra

You just showed yourself up bye bye


Not really no. What I see is your failed argument and now a ring and run.

Anytime you wanna try again with stopfake let me know.



posted on Jan, 5 2016 @ 02:57 PM
link   
the university of Ottawa in Canada has done an investigation into the maiden events and claims proof of what exactly went down and who to blame. very factual and informative if you haven't checked it out. not linking. many here have not learned in over 2 years from links, it is time to do your own research on these subjects and come to your own conclussions.
just passing this along as seems relevant.



posted on Jan, 5 2016 @ 05:05 PM
link   
a reply to: letscit

How about a link so we all can read the same article your referring to.



posted on Jan, 5 2016 @ 05:08 PM
link   
a reply to: letscit




the university of Ottawa in Canada has done an investigation into the maiden events and claims proof of what exactly went down and who to blame.


About that investigation...


A reading of this 29-page paper would therefore seem warranted. As preliminary comments, one notes some oddities about this paper. On three occasions the author refers to it as an “academic” study. It is not. It is an unpublished research paper that has not yet been peer reviewed. That is evident from its layout, which is a chaotic listing of facts, one after the other, often in a very confusing manner. An editor would have asked the author to highlight the important facts and say why they are significant.

An editor would also have suggested the removal of passages that are completely off topic, such as the author’s allusion (p. 28) to Nazi, OUN, and UPA-led crimes in the Second World War, which are compared directly, without the addition of a single date, to deaths in Odesa and the Donbas in 2014.

Moreover, the paper appears politically driven, i.e. it sets out to prove that the change of regime in Kyiv last spring was illegitimate and that a democratically elected president (however corrupt) was forced out of power by a rightist-orchestrated coup. The conclusion is a veritable jumble of illogical reasoning and statements that do not seem warranted by the findings, which are themselves confusing, as will be noted below.



It would have been advisable for the author to focus on his findings and offer some preliminary assessments as to what they might mean. If the reader discerns that the apparent purpose of a paper is to discredit and malign the current government, then it ipso facto becomes a political tract (and moreover one that appears to fall closely into line with the RT version of events disseminated in the Russian Federation), which then leads to suspicions about its methodology. A more objective approach is needed. Without it, even the most startling revelations will not receive serious attention.


ukraineanalysis.wordpress.com...




top topics
 
5
<< 7  8  9   >>

log in

join