It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Do you think our current government spends wisely?
And if not, why would you want to increase the amount of funds that they take?
I don't mind paying to protect other American citizens from hardship. Isn't that supposed to be the purpose of the government, to protect its citizens?
Then pay the government more. No one is stopping you. I think the government spends my money foolishly. I think they spend it poorly. It's great that you want to use your money to help government take care of people.
I don't.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Do you think our current government spends wisely?
And if not, why would you want to increase the amount of funds that they take?
I don't mind paying to protect other American citizens from hardship. Isn't that supposed to be the purpose of the government, to protect its citizens?
Then pay the government more. No one is stopping you. I think the government spends my money foolishly. I think they spend it poorly. It's great that you want to use your money to help government take care of people.
I don't.
So instead of helping people, you'd rather your tax money went to pay for what exactly? Killing people?
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Do you think our current government spends wisely?
And if not, why would you want to increase the amount of funds that they take?
I don't mind paying to protect other American citizens from hardship. Isn't that supposed to be the purpose of the government, to protect its citizens?
Then pay the government more. No one is stopping you. I think the government spends my money foolishly. I think they spend it poorly. It's great that you want to use your money to help government take care of people.
I don't.
So instead of helping people, you'd rather your tax money went to pay for what exactly? Killing people?
I'd rather keep most of my money and spend it the way I want to. You seem to feel like there is an obligation by government to take as much as they want to perform their services.
I want to pay the least amount to government.
Tell me, how much extra do you pay government in the form of taxes? There is nothing stopping you from doing so. So do you give 50%? 70%? 90%?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: DBCowboy
So you agree with Social programs, you just don't want to pay for them. Interesting...
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: DBCowboy
So you agree with Social programs, you just don't want to pay for them. Interesting...
Do you want higher taxes or lower taxes? I'm betting that you want higher taxes. You want the government to take more and do more.
Socialism is the nanny state. It is in direct opposition to individualism and self reliance. I stated that social programs are a necessary evil and you take that as if I'm endorsing social programs.
You don't want to give the government more of what YOU earn, but you have no problem with government taking more from someone else.
Spoken like a true socialist.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: MystikMushroom
That's a fun idea and experiment to try, but I think it is a fast track to abuse. How long before people start opting out of services but use them anyways? After all, how are you going to stop someone who didn't pay the road allotment stay off the highways?
originally posted by: nonspecific
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: MystikMushroom
That's a fun idea and experiment to try, but I think it is a fast track to abuse. How long before people start opting out of services but use them anyways? After all, how are you going to stop someone who didn't pay the road allotment stay off the highways?
Here in the UK our road tax is seperate and dependant on the engine size of the vehicle.
It is all hooked up to a computer system and big brother and if your caught driving without "road tax" you get a hefty fine and it also invalidates your insurance and gives you "points" on your licence that increase the cost of you premium.
It works prett well to be truthfull.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
I suppose we could take things a step farther and do an ala-carte tax system.
There would be a minimum "entry fee" for just being American. Call it an administrative tax, a sort of "bargain basement" tax of say 5-10%. You wouldn't get the universal health care, police services, fire department services, send your kids to public school, social security, medicare, medicaid, disability -- basically you would be "opting out" of being eligible to use any form tax-subsidized program.
The administrative tax would cover your portion for things you aren't going to be able to avoid (highways, defense spending, power grid maintenance) ... basically things you just can't get around using if you live inside America.
If you want to be able to call 9-11, you can pay another 1-2% or something. Do you want disability insurance as an option? You may get hurt and can't work...? That's another percent or two.
And, if you decide you want to serve in the military, you get these tax "add ons" given to you free. We treat our military lousy anyway, why not give them "full Costco membership" at a drastically reduced rate?
I know a lot of people personally that would "opt out" and take their chances. It might be an interesting experiment to see how well those people do. Sometimes, you don't realize how nice something is, or how much you really do need it until its gone...
It may be an unrealistic idea, but I don't see many people -- let alone politicians trying to come up with anything creative these days.