It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump declared 'third time loser' by Scotland after failing to block windfarm

page: 2
13
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 16 2015 @ 11:22 AM
link   
a reply to: snypwsd

he is not hitler ,has trump carried out experiments on babies ,that's a nice label you throw around but it has no substance.
and is godwin's law .




posted on Dec, 16 2015 @ 11:27 AM
link   
I don't watch either debates....they are full of one-liners, gotcha phrases, broad "feel-good" pronouncements with little detail. I look over the many years of their careers, and try and get an overall look at their judgments, decisions, demeanor, and empathy, as well as their toughness, and resolve.



posted on Dec, 16 2015 @ 11:36 AM
link   
a reply to: bastion

LOL. Not the first Golf Complex problem he has had recently. His name was removed from his Golf Complex in Dubai after his statement about not allowing Muslims into the US. It was put back after "negotiations". He probably invested more money and told them he 'didn't really mean it" with a nondisclosure contract.



posted on Dec, 16 2015 @ 11:40 AM
link   
does not really matter anyway the windturbines should be built far better than another nuclear powerstation,the opposition was just because they said it would be a eyesore ,i.e the rich playing golf did not want to see good clean energy turbines .
so in this case if you actually bothered to research is the best result for humanity.



posted on Dec, 16 2015 @ 01:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: bastion
Can't believe this guy is actually taken seriously by anyone, he can't even file the correct papers for planning permission, let alone run a country.


Not that I am a huge fan of Trump but to imply that he somehow personally filed the wrong paperwork is disingenuous. That responsibility would be on the organization's legal and real estate teams.


True but he's responsible for putting the team together (headed by George Soriel his executive vice president) and he signed the legal papers on his estate's complaint so ultimately the buck stops with him.


originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: bastion


Donald Trump's legal challenge to a planned offshore wind farm has been rejected by the UK's Supreme Court.

Developers hope to site 11 turbines off Aberdeen, close to Mr Trump's golfing development on the Aberdeenshire coast.

The US businessman and presidential hopeful was taking on the Scottish government, which approved the plan.

The Trump Organisation said it was an "extremely unfortunate" ruling and it would "continue to fight" the wind farm proposal.

Former First Minister Alex Salmond said the latest court verdict left Mr Trump a "three-time loser".



Trump declared 'third time loser' by Scotland after failing to block windfarm

So Trump fails yet again trying to rob a country of £200m because it will 'spoil his view' - despite him having already built a wall around his course and into peoples houses because that's his answer to everything.

Can't believe this guy is actually taken seriously by anyone, he can't even file the correct papers for planning permission, let alone run a country.



Funny, six or seven months ago, you wouldn't have cared and this wouldn't have been news. Good to see his every move, and his team's every move haunts your mind though. Keep that head in the sand.


Four years ago I was writing for BBC North and Private Eye covering the golf course scandal ande how he cut off the water supply to the homes of people objecting to having their homes demolished so he could build the course.
edit on 16-12-2015 by bastion because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 16 2015 @ 01:20 PM
link   
a reply to: bastion

I'm no golfer but was this course really necessary?

It's hard to believe that it was going to become a five star course, let alone A mainstay on the tour. Trump could fund the construction of a Formula one track but who would miss out? no one since there is a science behind making a track and a par 5. you don't just buy a block of land and expect magic to happen and I'm glad that it's not going ahead for a number of reasons.

1.Trump throwing a tantrum

2. Trump throwing a tantrum.

3. St. Andrews.

There are plenty of prestigious golf courses around the globe, the last thing we need is the first annual Trump trophy played at the Trump links that is proudly sponsored by Trump enterprises.


edit on 16-12-2015 by Thecakeisalie because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 16 2015 @ 01:36 PM
link   
a reply to: bastion

It's not just him and his ability to file paperwork...

His doctor also started his letter about Trump's health with "To Whom My Concern"

I'm not joking:



Why do I feel we're all being trolled?
edit on 16-12-2015 by MystikMushroom because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 16 2015 @ 01:43 PM
link   
a reply to: jimmyx

and she did a bang up job. That hit she escaped should have been successful. Kerrys SecState now and he sucks too. No emails?



The agencies that owned and originated that intelligence – the CIA and National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency or NGA – reviewed the emails to determine how they should be properly stored, as the State Department took issue with their highly classified nature. The subject matter of the messages is widely reported to be the movement of North Korean missiles and a drone strike. A top secret designation requires the highest level of security, and can include the use of an approved safe.

The sources, who were not authorized to speak on the record, told Fox News that while the emails were indeed “top secret” when they hit Clinton’s server, one of them remains “top secret” to this day -- and must be handled at the highest security level. The second email is still considered classified but at the lower “secret” level because more information is publicly available about the event


The fact that she allows anything this sensitive to be outside of government security is BS. They investigated and made a CIA director resign based on an affair but her husband dig a bang up job in office, no?

As far as Trump...he will win in the end.
edit on 12pm31pmf0000002015-12-16T13:44:26-06:000126 by matafuchs because: (no reason given)

edit on 12pm31pmf0000002015-12-16T13:45:00-06:000100 by matafuchs because: (no reason given)

edit on 12pm31pmf0000002015-12-16T13:45:14-06:000114 by matafuchs because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 16 2015 @ 02:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: bastion
True but he's responsible for putting the team together (headed by George Soriel his executive vice president) and he signed the legal papers on his estate's complaint so ultimately the buck stops with him.


Signing the legal papers does not mean one composed them nor does it mean that they need to be versed in the legal aspects of other nations (or even their own). That is why you pay people and it sounds like the people who were to prepare these documents did not know the laws well enough.



posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 02:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: yuppa
You mean the scottish actually can write and argue something and sound sober?(joke joke no offense meant ok boyo?)

A wind farm in Scottland. Is there enough wind to even justify it?


to answer your second question ....
en.wikipedia.org...

your first sentence would be offensive .... if it weren’t so downright stupid !!



posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 05:27 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: bastion
True but he's responsible for putting the team together (headed by George Soriel his executive vice president) and he signed the legal papers on his estate's complaint so ultimately the buck stops with him.


Signing the legal papers does not mean one composed them nor does it mean that they need to be versed in the legal aspects of other nations (or even their own). That is why you pay people and it sounds like the people who were to prepare these documents did not know the laws well enough.



Actually in the UK it's a criminal offence to sign legal papers without declaring you understand them and have checked them for errors.

Apointees prepare the papers but the only reason someone else can sign on the claimants behalf if is the claimant has been medically deemed incapable of reading, understanding, comprehending or signing their name.



posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 06:09 AM
link   
a reply to: bastion

I would like to see a link to this statute because I frankly find that somewhat unbelievable. This means a person not versed in the law must actually fully understand the law to ensure that the paperwork prepared by a supposedly knowledgeable attorney is correct.

At that point why do you need a professional preparer when you yourself have to know the law? Why not just do it yourself?



posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 07:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: bastion

I would like to see a link to this statute because I frankly find that somewhat unbelievable. This means a person not versed in the law must actually fully understand the law to ensure that the paperwork prepared by a supposedly knowledgeable attorney is correct.

At that point why do you need a professional preparer when you yourself have to know the law? Why not just do it yourself?



Agreed it's crazy but it is the law - the law in defence is that any contracts needs to be written in 'plain English' not legalise. If someone has failed to research and underswtand the law when filing papers then they're breaking the law and get sentenced for being 'criminally thick' (more formally known as wasting court time by taking something to a court of law without bothering to read basic law).

Here's a copy of court filing papers, declarations are in the back page - signing when failing to understand the law is contempt of court and a prisonable offence as ignorance of the law is not innocence over here. You file a legal complaint, it has to be on a legal basis, otherwise it's wasting court time.

www.justice.gov.uk...
edit on 17-12-2015 by bastion because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 07:34 AM
link   
a reply to: bastion

Where is the specific statute?



posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 07:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: bastion

Where is the specific statute?


We're the UK, we don't have statutes, we have an uncodified constitution.

Halisbury’s Statutes is the closest we have - it's 50 volumes of books of court rulings prior to 1987 - after then you use Westlaw- but these are only for acts of Parliament, not courts.
edit on 17-12-2015 by bastion because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 07:37 AM
link   
a reply to: bastion

Where is the specific wording that says what you are claiming?



posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 07:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: bastion

Where is the specific wording that says what you are claiming?


As stated we're uncodified - we don;t have specific wordings, that's for codified nations. It comes under contract, common, magistrates, crown, civil law and acts of parliament and millions of legal rulings, not just one specific wording.
edit on 17-12-2015 by bastion because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 07:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: bastion
As stated we're uncodified - we don;t have specific wordings, that's for codified nations.


So nothing to support your claim?

What is the purpose of having an attorney if you need to understand the law yourself?



edit on 17-12-2015 by AugustusMasonicus because: networkdude has no beer



posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 07:42 AM
link   
a reply to: bastion

Very interesting, thanks for posting. He knew this was coming and yet he still continues to fight it, not because he thought he was going to win but because it seems like he can't bear to be told 'no'.


a reply to: LSU0408


Funny, six or seven months ago, you wouldn't have cared and this wouldn't have been news. Good to see his every move, and his team's every move haunts your mind though. Keep that head in the sand.


You can't honestly believe that the world revolves around your US elections? This has been news in Scotland for years, it's been an ongoing embarrasment for Trump.



posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 07:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: bastion
As stated we're uncodified - we don;t have specific wordings, that's for codified nations.


So nothing to support your claim?

What is the propose of having an attorney if you need to understand the law yourself?


No, as said it's uncodified. Look up the word uncodified and how British Law works, included in all the links provided then you'll see how the law works.

In the UK an attourney is a legal adviser to the crown - we're the UK not the US. We have a different legal system - we have barristers, representitives, solictors etc.... but they're there to argue your case in a court - it's up to the individual to understand the law as our legal system expects us to be educated or educate ourselves - we don't get handouts.

You're right it is a bit pointless having representatives in court when we have to know the law - but their main role is to put the case to the judge and to pick holes in the other sides argument (justice has nothing to do with guilt, just which side has the argument with the most holes in it which can be pounced on and exposed in court). They're there to wind up the other side on your behalf, so you don't end up putting yourself in trouble by allowing your emotions to run wild and say something that you'll later regrett.
edit on 17-12-2015 by bastion because: (no reason given)


-----

Appologies if any of these or earlier posts sound aggressive, I don't intend them to be, you're a bloody good poster on here and rightfully request proof rather than supposition, I've just got some seriously bad news today so in headbutting walls mode, nothing personal sorry.
edit on 17-12-2015 by bastion because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
13
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join