It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
f the admitted pools of molten metal were aluminum from the planes then where did the molten pools at trade center 7 come from?
No plane hit this building yet NASA images show the hot-spots equivalent to the hot-spots where the molten steel/aluminum was in WTC1 and 2.
WTC 7 Damage Description
So we go there and on the north and east side of 7 it didn’t look like there was any damage at all, but then you looked on the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors. Debris was falling down on the building and it didn’t look good.
I can predict the deniers answer. "there was no molten metal at WT7." That's a bold faced lie.
Not only did it fly but it had enough horizontal force to become embedded. Your claims are laughable and have been proven false over and over again. By the LAWS of physics and common sense observation.
The squibs themselves have been used by official story believers as evidence the pancaking was causing pressure build up. How do you explain squibs many floors apart blasting out at the same time? Gravity and inertia?
These things were more than like propelled there from an aircraft hitting them at a high rate of speed and deflected.
Your picture proves nothing, not even that it was associated with the WTC incident.
Aluminum itself is flammable in certain instances, ever thrown a beer can into a campfire and notice the thin parts are not there any more, only the crimp and top and the bottom?.
Just because some people claim to have found thermite or thermate and it resembled the controlled demolitions you have seen on TV does not mean it was.
Jet fuel and plastics and wood from office furniture along with a LOT of paper burning, Heat, annealing of the metal support structure and the forces of gravity bearing down from the structure above the fires are all that are required for the building to collapse as it did.
The only issue is whether the whole thing was simply allowed to happen or arranged.
originally posted by: charolais
Has there ever been any analysis or investigation examining the microstructure of the steel from the beams? That will help show what happened to it (mechanically) during the collision/collapse.
It's been proven over and over again that there was molten steel, flowing like a foundry, and the usual suspects will continue to deny with any and all improbable and sometimes even false claims.
originally posted by: MyHappyDogShiner
Squibs?....Apparently some have never witnessed concrete failing when under pressure.
It explodes and shoots powdered concrete around in puffs of dust just like on the WTC because of the repeated shocks from the collapse occurring above causing the concrete and structure below to "pre-fail" I suppose one would say.