It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Melting steel?

page: 27
16
<< 24  25  26    28  29  30 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 08:18 PM
link   
a reply to: TheChrome

The floors did not pancake, NIST said it them selves.. the video proves it..




posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 08:19 PM
link   
a reply to: TheChrome



People who believe in controlled demolition should not be allowed to reproduce. Period. I am intolerant of such low intellect.


Perhaps they think that demolition teams place mufflers on explosives so as not to disturb the surrounding community.
edit on 21-12-2015 by skyeagle409 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 08:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb



Engineers talks of Trade Center myths, argues fire-proofing doomed building

According to Corley, the initial impact weakened the buildings so much that any extra disturbance, including the fires that followed, would have caused a collapse.

911-engineers.blogspot.com...

[





Design
Worthington, Skilling, Helle & Jackson White Paper

A white paper on the structure of the Twin Towers carried out by the firm of Worthington, Skilling, Helle & Jackson contained eleven numbered points, including:

The buildings have been investigated and found to be safe in an assumed collision with a large jet airliner (Boeing 707-DC 8) traveling at 600 miles per hour. Analysis indicates that such collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building and would not endanger the lives and safety of occupants not in the immediate area of impact.


--City in the Sky, p 131

Glanz and Lipton summarize the findings of the white paper:

The Vierendeel trusses would be so effective, according to the engineers' calculations, that all the columns on one side of a tower could be cut, as well as the two corners and several columns on the adjacent sides, and the tower would still be strong enough to withstand a 100-mile-per-hour wind.
--City in the Sky, p 133



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 08:24 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb



Dominick Derubbio -- Battalion Chief (F.D.N.Y.) [Division 8]

t was weird how it started to come down. It looked like it was a timed explosion, but I guess it was just the floors starting to pancake one on top of the other.

www.flcv.com...



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 08:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb



Dominick Derubbio -- Battalion Chief (F.D.N.Y.) [Division 8]

t was weird how it started to come down. It looked like it was a timed explosion, but I guess it was just the floors starting to pancake one on top of the other.

www.flcv.com...




There was no pancaking... NIST said so and the video proves it..



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 08:27 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb

Now, for the rest of the story.



Civil & Structural Engineers on WTC Collapse

One of the major reasons the fires burned the buildings as completely as they did was the fact that the sprinklers failed to work, he said.

When the planes hit the towers, they cut through the water supply that would otherwise have helped calm the fires, Corley said.

Corley went on to discuss the fire-proofing of the internal columns done during the construction of the buildings in the 1960s, which also contributed to the building's collapse.

911-engineers.blogspot.com...



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 08:28 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb

Facts and evidence do not support your case.


edit on 21-12-2015 by skyeagle409 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 08:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

Now, for the rest of the story.



Civil & Structural Engineers on WTC Collapse

One of the major reasons the fires burned the buildings as completely as they did was the fact that the sprinklers failed to work, he said.

When the planes hit the towers, they cut through the water supply that would otherwise have helped calm the fires, Corley said.

Corley went on to discuss the fire-proofing of the internal columns done during the construction of the buildings in the 1960s, which also contributed to the building's collapse.

911-engineers.blogspot.com...


Unsubstantiated, impossible to know, pure opinion and pointless..



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 08:32 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb




posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 08:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

Facts and evidence do not support your case.




Sure they do, the laws of physics are never wrong..



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 08:33 PM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409

Were looking for truth, not a case.
Something you run from.
Constantly.



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 08:35 PM
link   
a reply to: randyvs

You not going to find it in the debunked and hoaxed videos of 9/11 conspiracy theorist.



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 08:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb




Video debunked, foam burns, another half A$$ propaganda hit piece..



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 08:38 PM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409




You not going to find it in the debunked and hoaxed videos of 9/11 conspiracy theorist.


And everyone on this site knows it won't come from you.
edit on Rpm122115v39201500000031 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 08:38 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb




posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 08:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: randyvs

You not going to find it in the debunked and hoaxed videos of 9/11 conspiracy theorist.


And we won't find it in your post either..



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 08:39 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb

The video is proven by the fact that you are unable to provide those WTC video time lines, which simply means you have no case.



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 08:41 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb




And we won't find it in your post either..


But at least we haven't settled for the biggest bullsh1t story
in history.



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 08:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

The video is proven by the fact that you are unable to provide those WTC video time lines, which simply means you have no case.



Video time lines ? are we getting tired.. your post makes no sense..



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 08:42 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb



Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report - The World Trade Center

www.popularmechanics.com...

edit on 21-12-2015 by skyeagle409 because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
16
<< 24  25  26    28  29  30 >>

log in

join