It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Millionaire cleared of rape after claiming he ‘accidentally penetrated’ teenager

page: 7
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in


posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 04:58 AM
"Yeah I slipped with this knife peeling potatoes and cut a millionaire Saudis penis head off. No it wasn't consensual and we were the only ones there. Prove I did it intentionally."

I find that more believable then
I slipped and fell! My penis happened to plant firmly in her vagina as I ejaculated!
Freak accident!

She tried to accuse me of rape after sex to get my money sounds more believable.
Sounds like that wasn't his story.
Instead we hear some bold face lie.

I mean do you honestly believe it's possible for myself to fall over....and somehow end up with my penis in your vagina? Are you laying with your legs spread eagle on the bottom of the 4 step stairs covered in motor oil?
Was I on YouTube wanking and you called my name...OMG MOTOR OIL AHGG
look out vagina here comes challenger for a space dock.
Ugh I just love slipping and falling so much I believe I will ejaculate! How erotic it is to fall over!!!

posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 05:46 AM
what i find most astonishing about this case isn't the ridiculous story the guy is pushing about falling on her but the fact that this millionaire was granted 20 minutes to give private testimony, something that is usually only permitted to minors and those who's identity must be concealed, eg when an officer of the security services or SIS are required to testify...

the very fact that this man was granted permission to testify privately speaks volumes to me, it means either one or two things, he's either politically connected or he paid for the privilege which i don't think is beyond the realms of possibility given the state of the legal system here in the UK

they found his DNA (Semen) in the girls vagina, she claims it wasn't consensual, his story was that it didn't happen but after being confronted with DNA evidence he changes his story to, he fell and accidentally penetrated her and ejaculated, now the problem with that is, had this been an ordinary working class guy, with this kind of evidence i have no doubt he would have been convicted after such a terrible excuse for how his DNA got there... but as it is, this man isn't the average working class man, he's a millionaire, which only serves to further prove that the legal system in the UK is corrupt beyond belief, anybody refuting that fact is in denial or not in possession of all the facts..

it is my opinion that this guy used his money and connections to get himself those 20 private minutes and in those 20 minutes something occurred, either a bribe was offered and accepted or the judge in this case was blackmailed with something he would rather not find it's way into the public domain, it wouldn't be the first time.. as i said that is just an opinion, i have no proof for any of it, also i would very much like to know who the guys legal representative was because if i ever find myself in legal trouble, he's the guy i want... he must be one of the best around to keep this guy from getting convicted

edit on 17/12/2015 by Ph03n1x because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 06:04 AM
a reply to: ladyvalkyrie

Maybe you're right, maybe it was consensual. Maybe the girl was a tramp. So, why was THAT not his defense? Why the utterly ridiculous 'defense' of "oops it was an accident"? HIS explanation is what makes me believe that he's totally guilty of rape and the fact that the court bought his lame crap is just one more kick in the nuts to the victim and the 'justice' system.

What are you talking about? I do believe that is his defense.

Anyways, I read the short story of it. There both bull#ing and everybody else as well. I do believe they both just got the sour part of the deal and now for some reason it ended up in courts. The females in question are obviously tramps as you said, I mean no doubt they were at a club were millionaires hang out for the free salad, and they both went home with him because ah why not, most people go home with strange people they just met at a bar and tag along with friends for the fun of sleeping on the couch while they get it on next door.

And of the likely other people at that club, I am sure he was not the only guy there and in fact not the only millionare business man, I mean if millionaries go there it must be popular, or so other guys at that said bar its also a coinkidence they chose to go with that one particular guy out of the majority of people there, and likely the hundreds of other guys they walked by that day. I mean there had to have been other millionaires around in there, but you knows, right?

Like I said. This is a none issue. And if I have not said that I say it now. A none issue.

Dont even know why its in the courts. Is somebody suing somebody here for damages or something? Why should I care or anybody care what two people or scuse me 3 people who all willingly engaged in whatever they did. But why should we bother with this or care at all? Most especially when there all obviously full of #. I do believe this is a meaningful as the whole gamergate fiasco. Basically all just a bunch of nonsense following the $$$ were somebody is just a little peeved things did not pan out as they wanted. And that includes the dude in question and the female's in question.

It is a none issue, and nothing I have read on here, or what you people have said makes it any different. So ya! Like I said, both and all parties involved are bull#ing out there a holes. Over who know what and who cares, a bunch of adults got involved in something they willingly went along with, and now drama ensues...Oh the drama.

posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 06:13 AM

originally posted by: trollz
Yes, you read that right.

A London court has cleared property developer Ehsan Abdulaziz, 46, of raping an 18-year-old girl after just 30 minutes of deliberation. The London-based Saudi millionaire claimed he may have accidentally penetrated the teenager after he fell on her.

Now, there, there, that's not how it went.

Now, picture this: it's summer, a businessman visits a night club (Cirque le Soir) to meet his 24 year old girlfriend. They had been meeting for a while and had had sex before. That night, on on impulse, she brough her girlfriend with her, an 18 year old girl whom she had told about her Mecenas and who wanted to see it for herself - and maybe enjoy a number of free drinks in the process.

Our businessmen and his girls did what you do in such night clubs: drink, dance, have fun. Alas, certain kinds of fun can't be had in a night club (well, not in the Cirque le Soir, I guess) so Ehsan wants to take his 24 year old girlfriend home to have a good one. So far, nothing out of the ordinary. Being a nice gentleman, Ehsan offers the 18 year old girlfriend a ride home. She insists on staying with her girlfriend - well, they all were a little drunk - so Ehsan offers her a bed and T-shirt for the night. They all end up in his appartment.

In the appartment they first have a few shots of vodka. The 18 year old is provided a T-shirt as promised and as Ehsan en his girlfriend are going about their merry ways on top of the sofa, she decides to lie down on the floor before the sofa and dozes off. The business man and his girl friend get it on, but given the situation they decided it's better not to undress, so he slips his instrument through the zipper of his pants and she simply moves down her underpants a bit. After he's done his lil' John is still poking out of his zipper covered with you-know-what. He pulls back, then looses his balance and falls down, right on top of the 18 year old. And his mess ends up between her legs. But as he just had an orgasm he's not able to pull it off again, nor was that his intention to begin with, so he climbs back on the sofa and falls asleep.

I'm not sure if the 18 year old wanted to have sex with him - remember: she's an 18 year old London girl, he's a wealthy business man, it happens (ask her 24 year old girlfriend). But come on, if you go to a night club, then voluntarily go home with a man that wants to have sex with your girlfriend - and end up without your underpants, just wearing a T-shirt, in front of the sofa on which your girlfriend has sex.. hardly a case here.

Source: RT. Mm. Ones smells a rat.
edit on 17-12-2015 by ForteanOrg because: he had to unex the ex

posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 06:16 AM
In other news, this is an excellent development for all would-be rapists out there. They just need to make sure there are no witnesses, and then can go in with the 'ol "I tripped and my penis slipped into her than ejaculated" story.

posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 06:21 AM
a reply to: Urantia1111
Very suspicious circumstances indeed. Why is this in court is the biggest mystery, if this is what it looks like why dont they just pay them off and get on with it. Why let it go to the courts to begin with unless he actually did nothing, which is not likely.

Did somebody post all the falling on penis vids yet. I only saw the die hard one. Drama ensuing drama, females and there boyfriends and lovers and what, what a headache bound to lead to some risque situations and then, go to the courts, and then end up on internet sites were we get to comment on. But why should we pay for other peoples guilty consciousness for there one night stands or whatever was going on there, much less bother with there dramas. Hopefully like the other dramas the tax payers dont have to pay for all the court proceedings, make the rich guy pay, he likely can afford it.

In the words of Eminem.

Wait! What if there's an explanation for this #? (What? She tripped? Fell? Landed on his dick?!) Alright Shady, maybe he's right Grady But think about the baby before you get all crazy.

posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 06:34 AM
a reply to: Astyanax

Sometimes, what I read on this site makes me despair of humanity. I have to keep reminding myself that the membership of ATS is not representative of humankind in general.

Ya your right. We have some of the best and brightest here once in a while. OK, OK, I jest. More like once a turquoise moon but still smarter then the average bear, as a yogi once said.

But still, I regress, that just says how much humanity is so six way to Sunday doooomeeed if the better half of the worse half just does not cut it. A somber thought there that, right? that this all may just represent the better half of humanity eh?

Maybe I should have capitalized that to better get my point across. DOOOMEEED. That or just more people getting up to who knows what, the lime light makes everything seem so much more then it really is. And what it is? Is but there personal responsibilities and consents on all parties involved it seems as well.

posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 06:41 AM
I wonder if he "accidentally" enjoyed it and probably even attained orgasm during his fall.
The poor man suffers from premature ejaculation as well as being clumsy.
Poor, poor millionaires - always misunderstood.

Eta: I wonder if the judge gave the jury the following instructions:
We will remain in court as long as it takes for your to find the defendant not guilty.
edit on 17-12-2015 by Asktheanimals because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 06:51 AM

originally posted by: crazyewok
A Saudi ......cause the pos got off.

Cant do anything bad to a saudi in the UK. They are a protected class....

EVen more true in the US.
In case of terror attacks on US soil all Saudis are allowed to board planes immediately.
EVERYONE else is grounded.

posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 08:54 AM
it could happen if you were playing naked twister

posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 09:14 AM

originally posted by: Eilasvaleleyn
In other news, this is an excellent development for all would-be rapists out there. They just need to make sure there are no witnesses, and then can go in with the 'ol "I tripped and my penis slipped into her than ejaculated" story.

Of course not: the story needs to be plausible and preferably some evidence should be present. In the case of the OP you might have queried the others present in the night club, the taxi driver (assuming they weren't doing a DUI), perhaps the night guard of the appartment complex, there might have been videos. And of course, the statement of the accused and his company.

Only if sufficient PROOF of his guild has been provided a judge would rule against the victim. In this case, there simply was not sufficient proof for the rape.

Lessons for young girls that don't want to get raped: don't go to a nightclub, don't drink, don't get tipsy, don't get into a cab with a horny guy and your girlfriend, DO accept his offer to drive you home (or have your driven home), don't drink (more?) vodka when you get into his appartment, don't undo your undies while there, don't try to peek on them if they make out..

Hey, I'm all for protection of people against rape. But if you don't want to get bitten by a lion, don't enter the lions cage.

posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 09:21 AM
a reply to: ForteanOrg

The conditions required are for you to be in a place, alone. Now, if you're in some dark alleyway it's a bit of a harder sell than its already ridiculousness.
And... Did they? Did they actually investigate properly?
Not that an investigation is even necessarily that trustworthy unless its totally transparent. Just look at the police's internal ones...
It doesn't help that the accused got twenty minutes of privacy with the judge (and prosecution?)

PROOF? Like his SEMEN in her VAGINA, you mean? You know, I'm all for that "innocent unless proven guilty" thing, but I think the defense has a bit of a duty to not openly lie, and not give a story that is total bullsh*t.
If he had have said "Yeah, we had sex, but it was consensual" I might have been less antagonistic, but first he says nothing happened. Then the evidence comes out. Then he changes his story.
Even if we assume he actually didn't rape her, I'm pretty sure lying to the court is ILLEGAL.

If you don't want to get raped, never be in a room alone with a man, ever. Otherwise his penis might accidentally slip into your vagina and ejaculate.

edit on 17/12/2015 by Eilasvaleleyn because: Reasons

posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 10:08 AM
He's a Saudi. Rape, abduction, is perfectly legal where he is from. So shrug. Women are property and dont have souls. And they are free game if unescorted by a male. Go figure. Great culture.

posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 10:35 AM
a reply to: galadofwarthethird
* This post is for Astyanax as well, so read up.

Scenario 1: Slutty drunk girls party with Saudi millionaire. Go home, bang all night and into the morning. Younger slutty girl decides she's going to get more out of the deal and cries rape. Either for blackmail, or to sue him civilly later.

Scenario 2: Slutty drunk girls party with Saudi millionaire. Go home, older one bangs him, younger one passes out on the couch. Next morning, younger one finds Saudi on top of her with his penis inside her. She leaves and makes a rape report.

Scenario 3: Slutty drunk girls party with Saudi millionaire. Go home, older one bangs him, younger one passes out on the couch. Next morning he, being such a nice guy, goes in to offer her a t-shirt or a taxi. She grabs him by the head, pulls him down on top of her. He's so fragile he can't stop the fall. And somehow, accidentally, his penis ends up ejaculating inside her.

If Scenario 1 is what happened, then THAT should be his defense. Hey, a big ol' consensual good time. Millions of men have skated on rape because of this defense. I would not want to see an innocent man punished, just as much as I would not want to see a guilty one walking free. But sometimes it just boils down to he said/she said. BUT THIS WAS NOT HIS DEFENSE.

The girl is claiming Scenario 2 happened. Which is feasible and would constitute the crime of rape.

This dip sh*t is claiming Scenario 3 happened. And a judge and jury bought it. It's physically impossible and it's an insult to anyone's intelligence.

A non issue? I don't care how slutty or drunk the girl is, I don't care that she passed out on his couch. NO ONE deserves to wake up to some gross old guy's penis inside their vagina. That's rape. It is exactly the opposite of a non-issue. It is the most degrading and damaging crime that could be committed on a person- second only to murder. And I could argue that rape is worse than murder because you have to live the rest of your life with the repercussions of what's been forced upon you. And now she has to deal with the secondary wounding of the court. She was victimized, she went to the authorities as she's supposed to do, and now this guy is walking free on account of the stupidest story anyone could ever have come up with. It's an insult to the victim and it's an insult to the 'justice' system.

posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 10:44 AM
@ ForteanOrg @galadofwarthethird @Astyanax

It doesn't matter that they were hanging out at a club. It doesn't matter if they were drinking. It doesn't matter that she passed out on his couch. It doesn't matter what she was wearing. No man has the right to penetrate a woman by any means without her consent. That is the definition of rape. Rape is the worst possible crime that could be committed against a person.

Your defense of this guy, and attitude that this crime is a 'non issue' is pretty disturbing.
edit on 17-12-2015 by ladyvalkyrie because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 10:47 AM
a reply to: ladyvalkyrie

And ForteanOrg is correct in that there are measures a woman can take to reduce her chances of being raped. But failing to take those precautions does NOT mean she deserves to be raped.

posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 10:50 AM
The man should be stoned until dead in the town centre.

posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 10:55 AM

originally posted by: ladyvalkyrie
Your defense of this guy, and attitude that this crime is a 'non issue' is pretty disturbing.

The only thing disturbing, in this thread, is how many people think they know more about this case than the 12 jurors that acquitted 30 minutes...after being privy to the entire case....including the 20 minute private testimony.

posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 11:09 AM
a reply to: peck420

Right. Because juries are infallible. And people cant be bribed.

I dont know every detail about this, but there is plenty to be suspicious about.
This entire ordeal reeks of bull# so strongly I can smell it from across the sea.

posted on Dec, 17 2015 @ 11:18 AM
a reply to: ladyvalkyrie

good post.

Too many graphic scenarios.

top topics

<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in