It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What Might A Worldwide Calpihate Look Like?

page: 1
23
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+2 more 
posted on Dec, 13 2015 @ 01:45 PM
link   
What might a Modern Day Caliphate look like?

A caliphate (Arabic: خِلافة khilāfa) is a form of Islamic government led by a caliph (Arabic: خَليفة khalīfah pronunciation. But a modern day Caliphate will be one that is largly ruled by not a calif but by a force. Once the force is no longer needed then and only then will Islam come together to agree on a Caliph.

Have you ever taken a closer look at China’s form of Communism?

The reason for the success of China’s form of communism is that it is actually a military central Govt in replacement of a Monarch or Imperial Family. The Modern day Caliphate will undergo the same metamorphosis as Communism under the Chinese. It wont have a one Islamic Sect leader, but one voted in by the united Muslim coalition as a head but it will be a military Caliphate, under strict Sharia law, enforced Sharia police and local Islamic Lawyers and Imams. Which answers the question on why Islamic Law courses are being added to public and private colleges in the US, and the allowing of Sharia courts (tribunals) alongside regional court system already in place.

As the pope is to Roman Catholics so will the Caliph be to Muslims both a political and spiritual leader. Presently Catholics outnumber Muslims by a small margin of roughly 2 to 1. At the moment those who profess Catholicism is around 3 billion and those who profess Islam is around 1.5 Billion, currently Islam is growing faster than Catholicism and should equal/or over take Catholicism by 2018.

Once a modern day Caliphate is put in place then and only then will a one world caliphate exist. To establish a modern day worldwide Caliphate there must be some who would sacrifice their live in order to see that it is in place currently ISIS, Al Queda and Boko Haram have heeded the call to Jihad. But many moderate Muslims also have taken Islam to every corner of the world. And once there the use the laws of the land to establish Sharia Law. Now remember any place or location no matter how small that is ruled by Sharia is and of itself a Caliphate. Again a Caliphate is a form of Islamic government that rules Muslim and those in that place or location. In the modern day version there is no need for a Caliph as long as the law is in place and Imams and Islamic lawyers are present to uphold Sharia (caliphate) Law.

Where is the location of a modern day Caliphate?

Please remember in today society we have commercial travel and now, unlike in the past, allows Muslims to live anywhere in the world. And wherever Muslims live there is where they can set up their Sharia to be upheld. Kind of like mini-Caliphates in regions where they live that they may uphold the laws of the Quran and the Hadiths and there particular brand of Islam among themselves, which can include non-believers on occasion. So in a sense there already exists a worldwide modern styled Caliphate in place in every community where Muslims live that unites all Muslims under Islamic rule of Law or modern Caliphate around the world. Anywhere a Muslim goes there is a Sharia Court of Islamic Law that is worldwide.

Currently in Most of the Muslim conclaves in our countries (US ans EU) they are controlled by two groups, the Moderate Muslims who are unarmed and the Radical Muslim that are armed. This is found in their own writings in the Quran

Surah 8:7" [Remember, O believers], when Allah promised you one of the two groups - that it would be yours - and you wished that the unarmed one would be yours. But Allah intended to establish the truth by His words and to eliminate the disbelievers”

This is important to understand why around the world where ever Muslims live and have migrated too they establish two groups one that is armed and one that is not. IN the US it is CAIR (the unarmed group, openly) and the Jihad Islamic force (the armed group, underground currently) that is prepared to attack at any moment.

Any Muslim desiring not to live under any countries law but choosing to live only under Sharia any where in the world are choosing to live under the Modern Caliphate. Remember the Caliphate is a govt under Sharia law. The duties are shared with local Imam, Islamic Lawyers or tribunal, and the religious police (Jihad forces) in upholding Islamic Law. We are seeing this in parts of the world like Pakistan, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Morocco, North, East and West Africa. And we are seeing the establishment of the modern styled Caliphate forming in EU and the US under the guise of Religious freedom, a mechanism they are taking advantage of in order to establish a secondary Govt via Sharia law. The Sharia conclaves at first seem harmless only to be used by Muslims but once this secondary govt is established it is seen to be in complete contrast to the laws and constitution of any lands in which they inhabit. Once these conclaves are established peacefully then the underground Islamic police force begin to wreak havoc and terror. Some by convert methods i.e SB shooter, Ft Hood, Paris, Germany, Turkey, Israel all have lots of examples of these terror tactics.

Other forms of their covert methods being employed or exploited are helping to stir up youths via the college campuses to hate police and race, much like we are seeing in the US supposedly by groups like BLM (receiving anonymous donations from groups like CAIR, NOI, etc) And open donations from race bating black Caucus and leaders like Jessie Jackson, Jeremiah Wright and others.

Another way is religious intolerance of the look of it. This could be Christian vs Muslim or better yet why not a group like Freedom From Religion vs Christianity, I haven’t seen them go after Islam in public schools and public offices, nor go after the above 10Db sound levels of Mosques while helping to go after Christian Churches that do. Or go after Hindu and Buddhist religious practices disguised as forms of mediation and exercise by stripping it of its religious connection. This all works into the hands of the worldwide Caliphate so when any particular society crumbles they have Islam established already to replace and enforce Sharia when it falls.

The Idea of living wholly by Sharia is shared by Moderate and Radical Muslims alike. When it comes to this it is their desire to have communities and the nations they live in run by and under Sharia law. In order to establish this over the unbeliever they must have a force one that evokes tactics of fear or what we term terrorism. This is what the Jihad do, this is the sole purpose of Jihad to place fear into people to conform to and establish Sharia over an unwilling participant. If they will not conform the Quran does allow for them to be killed for they are not one of those forbidden by Allah to be killed. And as seen in the above Quranic quote, “ and to eliminate the disbelievers”.

This is what the worldwide Caliphate might look like if the people of world don't wake up and smell the Falafel.


edit on 13-12-2015 by ChesterJohn because: (no reason given)




posted on Dec, 13 2015 @ 01:52 PM
link   
You might want to edit you title…


More Holy War wrapped in a modern form, hating on religion for fear they are going to get us.

Lets bicker on that some more while in reality the real wars are ongoing for resources, territory and control.


+3 more 
posted on Dec, 13 2015 @ 01:53 PM
link   
You've been overtaken by fear and paranoia and your last sentence illustrates your bias perfectly.

I'm not worried about a worldwide caliphate. It ain't going to happen.



posted on Dec, 13 2015 @ 01:55 PM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

While I agree it is in this way they gain control and keep it.

There is no more territories to be had they are already under the control of TPTB. That is why they want to cull humanity and reach out tot he stars in manned moon and Mars bases.


edit on 13-12-2015 by ChesterJohn because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 13 2015 @ 02:00 PM
link   
a reply to: aorAki

not at all an open mind sees all scenarios in play and is prepared.

But to those who close their eyes are blind.

How can the blind lead the blind lest they both fall into a ditch.

Open your eyes and deny ignorance and see what is going on. there are forces here far above the MSM, Religions and Political agenda's It is a fight for your very soul.

Sorry if a digressed.



posted on Dec, 13 2015 @ 02:00 PM
link   
It would look something like the Ottoman Empire.



posted on Dec, 13 2015 @ 02:08 PM
link   
It wouldn't happen.

You need boots on the ground to enforce the law by force.

A world caliphate would look like France after the Germans invaded, or America when we outlawed alcohol.

-FBB



posted on Dec, 13 2015 @ 02:17 PM
link   
a reply to: ChesterJohn

The problem is a world wide caliphate won't happen due to the division between Islam itself, especially between Sunnis, Shi'ite, and Sufi.



posted on Dec, 13 2015 @ 02:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: intrptr

While I agree it is in this way they gain control and keep it.

There is no more territories to be had they are already under the control of TPTB. That is why they want to cull humanity and reach out tot he stars in manned moon and Mars bases.

They're taking over the moon, too? We'll bomb any Muslim State there. Get it, 'Islamic State', Muslim State? Theres a billion muslims all over the world already.



posted on Dec, 13 2015 @ 02:37 PM
link   
a reply to: ChesterJohn

I know the answer to this one!




posted on Dec, 13 2015 @ 02:39 PM
link   
a reply to: FriedBabelBroccoliYour anology in using France has a minor bad point. When the Germans took over France an awful lot of the French colluded and worked with them. Particularly the Southern French.
Paris was ruled with a rod of iron but the south Cannes and Nice just carried on being holiday places. Same old, same old.



posted on Dec, 13 2015 @ 02:39 PM
link   
a reply to: FriedBabelBroccoliYour anology in using France has a minor bad point. When the Germans took over France an awful lot of the French colluded and worked with them. Particularly the Southern French.
Paris was ruled with a rod of iron but the south Cannes and Nice just carried on being holiday places. Same old, same old.



posted on Dec, 13 2015 @ 02:39 PM
link   
a reply to: FriedBabelBroccoliYour anology in using France has a minor bad point. When the Germans took over France an awful lot of the French colluded and worked with them. Particularly the Southern French.
Paris was ruled with a rod of iron but the south Cannes and Nice just carried on being holiday places. Same old, same old.



posted on Dec, 13 2015 @ 02:39 PM
link   
a reply to: FriedBabelBroccoliYour anology in using France has a minor bad point. When the Germans took over France an awful lot of the French colluded and worked with them. Particularly the Southern French.
Paris was ruled with a rod of iron but the south Cannes and Nice just carried on being holiday places. Same old, same old.



posted on Dec, 13 2015 @ 02:46 PM
link   
WHAAAAT???? 4 posts and i haven't finished. How do I take off three posts???? I'll carry on with my reply to Fried Babel.
YEEEET. Although the French out numbered the Germans thousands to one they could not over throw their occupiers. It took the combined might of the allies to free them.
The same would be true if a caliphate was to rule a country. Who would come to your aid to free you if all countries were in the caliphate.



posted on Dec, 13 2015 @ 02:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: crayzeed
a reply to: FriedBabelBroccoliYour anology in using France has a minor bad point. When the Germans took over France an awful lot of the French colluded and worked with them. Particularly the Southern French.
Paris was ruled with a rod of iron but the south Cannes and Nice just carried on being holiday places. Same old, same old.




The point was more of a large body of factions waging a gorilla war against the invading body resulting in a failed state.

You can even relate it to Iraq where the large effort towards winning hearts and minds was an effort to reduce the violent insurgency which was a backlash against the drastic cultural changes the invading body was attempting to enforce.

I do understand your point, I just feel it wasn't directed at the particular aspect I was hoping to highlight.

-FBB



posted on Dec, 13 2015 @ 02:51 PM
link   
Pigs will be slaughtered like it happened when swineflu hit the islamic countries and no bacon exists in your plates anymore.



posted on Dec, 13 2015 @ 02:51 PM
link   
Beheading For Everyone!
No bacon
No booze.
No porn
No movie theaters.
Women burka durka




posted on Dec, 13 2015 @ 02:54 PM
link   
a reply to: ChesterJohn




Another way is religious intolerance of the look of it. This could be Christian vs Muslim or better yet why not a group like Freedom From Religion vs Christianity, I haven’t seen them go after Islam in public schools and public offices, nor go after the above 10Db sound levels of Mosques while helping to go after Christian Churches that do. Or go after Hindu and Buddhist religious practices disguised as forms of mediation and exercise by stripping it of its religious connection. This all works into the hands of the worldwide Caliphate so when any particular society crumbles they have Islam established already to replace and enforce Sharia when it falls.


I don't understand...Are you saying anti theists and freedom of religious advocates should be attacking all religions equally? If so I agree but you do realize the dominant religion in the west, specifically in America is Christianity therefore many students are practicing Christians and much of their ideals are pushed into public schools. i.e creationism, war on Christmas etc...

Also are you promoting another holy war? If so you do realize the Muslim population far out weighs the christian population? Have fun with your war dude...



posted on Dec, 13 2015 @ 02:55 PM
link   
As to the OP question... it would look very much like it does now, but with even more insanity, mental retardation, thought control and blood.

The Islamophobia is sad and scary... it plays directly into the hands of maniacs on both sides pushing for a "holy war" (which is the greatest of oxymorons)...

however, ignoring that certain adherents to Islam are not above killing in god's name (though really for more petty reasons, of course) is also wrong and not prudent... and is at complete odds with the "live and let live" mentality found in (varying degrees in) the West... but it should be stressed that painting people with broad strokes is dangerous and against the very ideals we Westerners (that term is also meant to be inclusive of more tolerant, wise followers of Islam, too, of course) are supposed to be defending.

Islam itself has a history of restraint, kindness and inclusion... and has given us modern society due to certain adherents keeping ancient records to enable the Renaissance, etc., but some forms of Islam are not retrained, kind or inclusive... just like some brands of most other belief systems.

Ignoring that potential (that lurks in ALL humans, to be fair) is stupid... thinking all, or even many, devoted to Islam are dangerous is false, but darnit, some goodhearted folks just don't know how illogical and different people can actually be... and how volatile certain interpretations of religion ( coupled with a warrior philosophy, economic hardship, hopelessness, culture shock and an inferiority complex) can make someone.




top topics



 
23
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join