It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

U.S. Lawmakers Make STUNNING Move To Investigate Obama For Helping ISIS

page: 6
103
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 13 2015 @ 06:14 PM
link   
a reply to: Sublimecraft




You only have to look at who ISIS is not attacking and/or threatening to gauge who is supporting them. Saudi Arabia & Israel both appear to have dodged that bullet, and both are US allies and both want Assad gone.


Isis releases first Hebrew video threatening to kill all Jews in Israel ‘for crimes against Palestinian people’

ISIS Takes to Social Media With Massive Threats Against Israel

ISIS pledge second Holocaust: Horrifying jihadis' threat as fears for Jewish people rises

ISIS Threat In Israel: Islamic State Supporters Threaten Christians In Jerusalem, Vow Slaughter Of Zionist Collaborators

I don't think they have dodge anything.

Once ISIS solidifies their power base.

It's on like donkey kong.




posted on Dec, 13 2015 @ 09:33 PM
link   
a reply to: DJW001






Then why are they doing a routine hit piece instead of presenting the information objectively?


What makes you think its not objective?



posted on Dec, 13 2015 @ 09:37 PM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

Wesley Clark is CFR which is both D and R for the record. Both sides of the aisle are in the thick of this geopoliticl engineering.



posted on Dec, 13 2015 @ 10:16 PM
link   
a reply to: jimmyx

As someone else has already mentioned, the article was just a reprint from another source so it wasn't a "Tea Party Blogger" opinion piece.



posted on Dec, 14 2015 @ 03:36 PM
link   
a reply to: EightTF3

You know what John McCain and the Neocons will do to derail the investigation. They will give Hilary and Obama political cover like Benghazi and come out and say this is a waste of Tax payers money and it's all political.



posted on Dec, 14 2015 @ 11:27 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Honestly, I'd be shocked if he wasn't helping them. Wasn't it already proven with regard to the Muslim Brotherhood? The whole Benghazi thing smelled very shady to me as well, in that regard. The real question is, will anyone do anything about it? I don't think I'll hold my breath on that one!




posted on Dec, 14 2015 @ 11:48 PM
link   


This clip proves that they have been funding isis all along. How they are not charged with treason is baffling.



posted on Dec, 15 2015 @ 09:43 AM
link   
Oh! Will this committee be comprised of the same intellectual giants that headed up the Obamacare repeals, and the Hillary Clinton investigations? If so, we should expect to hear that they've found nothing at all, in 2021.

a reply to: xuenchen



posted on Dec, 15 2015 @ 09:52 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

This committee is a lot of things, "stunning" isn't one of them. Partisan attack meant to appeal to voting demographics, DEFINITELY.



posted on Dec, 15 2015 @ 09:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: xuenchen

Now? They want to do this now? 3 years too late captain obviouses.


www.reuters.com...



President Barack Obama has signed a secret order authorizing U.S. support for rebels seeking to depose Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and his government, sources familiar with the matter said.


Three years too late? What makes you say that? This was done right on time. Less than a year before November 2016 right? Wait, you don't honestly believe this has anything to do with seeking out justice do you?



posted on Dec, 15 2015 @ 12:14 PM
link   
a reply to: qwerty12345

I got as far as "PRESENTED BY FOX NEWS" in the opening 'credits/title' page.
Then turned it off.

Fox news is not a reliable source.
End of story.



posted on Dec, 15 2015 @ 12:38 PM
link   
If they want to know who is funding & assisting ISIS, they just have to investigate their campaign contributors. God forbid they do that though, because then they would have to find real jobs. Blaming Obama for everything is wasting my tax money and time. The republicans always preach about government being to big and wasting tax dollars, yet will turn around and do it themselves over and over. I wasn't even surprised to see this article, thats the sad part.
edit on 15-12-2015 by amicktd because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 15 2015 @ 12:45 PM
link   
a reply to: amicktd

A bit of the hair of the dog that bit me.




posted on Dec, 15 2015 @ 08:26 PM
link   
The mods really need to start screening new threads in certain forums. People are way too eager to press their political stances on others and will use whatever trashy news article they can find to prove whatever it is they're trying to prove even if the source is glaringly questionable. It'd be nice if this forum had posts containing legitimate sources. ATS's standards are that of a news trailer park.



posted on Dec, 15 2015 @ 11:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Sublimecraft


You only have to look at who ISIS is not attacking and/or threatening to gauge who is supporting them


Iran?


So, now Shia Muslims are supporting Sunni wahabists?
edit on 15-12-2015 by pyramid head because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 16 2015 @ 03:02 AM
link   
a reply to: pyramid head


Fadhli is referred to by at least one well-connected jihadi figure, lamenting his supposed death on social media, as “Abu Asma al-Khorasani,” or Abu Asma from Khorasan. In fact, Fadhli, who is a Kuwaiti al-Qaeda veteran, has lived in Iran for several years. He seems to have been one among a small community of al-Qaeda leaders and their families who, after fleeing the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, were kept under strict surveillance but not imprisoned, extradited, or killed by Iran’s fundamentalist Shia government. (To avoid jeopardizing this arrangement, al-Qaeda apparently held back from attacks on Iranian soil, despite considering Iran an archenemy; politics make strange bedfellows.)


carnegieendowment.org...


Iran has long been harboring senior al Qaeda, al Nusra, and so-called Khorasan Group leaders as part of its complicated strategy to influence the region and keep itself off the terrorist target list, according the U.S. government, intelligence agencies, and terrorism experts.


www.thedailybeast.com...


Virtually unnoticed, since late 2001, Iran has held some of al Qaeda's most senior leaders. Several of these operatives, such as Yasin al-Suri, an al Qaeda facilitator, have moved recruits and money from the Middle East to central al Qaeda in Pakistan. Others, such as Saif al-Adel, an Egyptian that served as head of al Qaeda's security committee, and Abu Muhammad al-Masri, one of the masterminds of the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings in East Africa, have provided strategic and operational assistance to central al Qaeda. The Iranian government has held most of them under house arrest, limited their freedom of movement, and closely monitored their activities. Yet the organization's presence in Iran means that, contrary to optimistic assessments that have become the norm in Washington, al Qaeda's demise is not imminent.


www.foreignaffairs.com...







edit on 16/12/15 by Chadwickus because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 16 2015 @ 01:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: pyramid head


Fadhli is referred to by at least one well-connected jihadi figure, lamenting his supposed death on social media, as “Abu Asma al-Khorasani,” or Abu Asma from Khorasan. In fact, Fadhli, who is a Kuwaiti al-Qaeda veteran, has lived in Iran for several years. He seems to have been one among a small community of al-Qaeda leaders and their families who, after fleeing the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, were kept under strict surveillance but not imprisoned, extradited, or killed by Iran’s fundamentalist Shia government. (To avoid jeopardizing this arrangement, al-Qaeda apparently held back from attacks on Iranian soil, despite considering Iran an archenemy; politics make strange bedfellows.)


carnegieendowment.org...


Iran has long been harboring senior al Qaeda, al Nusra, and so-called Khorasan Group leaders as part of its complicated strategy to influence the region and keep itself off the terrorist target list, according the U.S. government, intelligence agencies, and terrorism experts.


www.thedailybeast.com...


Virtually unnoticed, since late 2001, Iran has held some of al Qaeda's most senior leaders. Several of these operatives, such as Yasin al-Suri, an al Qaeda facilitator, have moved recruits and money from the Middle East to central al Qaeda in Pakistan. Others, such as Saif al-Adel, an Egyptian that served as head of al Qaeda's security committee, and Abu Muhammad al-Masri, one of the masterminds of the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings in East Africa, have provided strategic and operational assistance to central al Qaeda. The Iranian government has held most of them under house arrest, limited their freedom of movement, and closely monitored their activities. Yet the organization's presence in Iran means that, contrary to optimistic assessments that have become the norm in Washington, al Qaeda's demise is not imminent.


www.foreignaffairs.com...








Wow, literally the three biggest piece of garbage sources of globalists/admin mouthpieces.

I know you really had to search for that propaganda because you could literally just google "Iran fighting ISIS" and just the first page is full of CNN, dailymail, NYT showing the opposite.

But hey, never mind the reality that Sunni wahabists and Shia Muslims are bitterly opposed to one another, it's whatever the demon king huessein obozo says, he determines reality.



posted on Dec, 16 2015 @ 06:38 PM
link   
Wait, the enemy of our enemy isn't our friend?

You'd've thought we'd've learned that with our entire over involvement in Iran-Iraq, Afghanistan-USSR.

If we're going after politicians for "arming" our enemies, let's get them all and quit dancing the party line tunes because they're making fools of you all... plus you all have no rhythm! ;-)

Derek



posted on Dec, 16 2015 @ 07:11 PM
link   
Never thought I'd see the day when a president of the US would not even have to show his birth certificate to prove that he is a citizen of the US.
it seems they do just what they want.
edit on 16-12-2015 by madenusa because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 15 2016 @ 10:29 PM
link   



new topics

top topics



 
103
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join