It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Islam and the Cultural Jihad in America

page: 2
<< 1   >>

log in


posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 09:54 PM
a reply to: xuenchen

According to this Pew Research report (published 4 days ago), Muslims currently make up about 1% of the adult population in America. That would be doubled if we took in about 80% of all Syrian refugees I guess?

Meanwhile, dominionists (New Apostolic Reformation) already outnumber Muslims in this country and they're 100% extremist by their very nature. They are waging their own cultural Jihad:

The 7 Mountains - Beyond SALVATION is OCCUPATION

The 7 mountains are 7 sectors in society that mold the way we think, that is our culture is shaped by these spheres or mountains. Society is changed/transformed through all 7 mountains.

Economy, Government, Family, Spirituality, Education, Media & Celebration.

God has a strategy for transforming society; it is through the marketplace/workplace, in each of these mountains. “Those people who occupy the high places have the influence”

Generals International

They concluded that in order to truly transform any nation with the Gospel of Jesus Christ, these seven facets of society must be reached: Religion, Family,Education, Government, Media, Arts & Entertainment and Business.

The Reformation Prayer Network’s primary goal is to be a catalyst, through prayer and righteous activism, which will bring change to these areas of societal influence.

A re-introduction of biblical truth and Bible-centric values is the key to renewal and restoration in America’s failing educational system.

The progressive liberal agenda, empowered by well-known men and women in the arts and entertainment industries, have made significant gains in the political arena over the past few decades. In fact, many liberal groups, such as the ACLU, seek to remove anything related to God or Christianity from the governmental and educational systems because of a misapplied interpretation of the phrase, “separation of church and state.” We must see a shift in this arena in order to preserve the Christian heritage that America was founded upon. The goal is to put in place righteous political leaders that will positively affect all aspects of government.

Ted Cruz is a dominionist. Rick Perry and Michele Bachmann both have deep dominionist ties as does Huckabee and if I'm not mistaken (and this frankly surprised me), Newt Gingrich. None of them have Ted "Anointed King" Cruz beat though, his daddy has been telling him he's on a divine mission to "take dominion" over the world since he was a little kid.

Obviously I don't want any religious extremists taking control of anything AT ALL but whereas it defies reason to believe that there's some serious threat of "Cultural Jihad" if for no other reason than it's a logistical impossibility given the extreme minority status of Muslims in American society and in government (there are two Muslims in Congress in total).

The nonsensical obsession with hating and being afraid of Muslims is massively overshadowing the real religious takeover attempt that is in the works.
edit on 2015-12-11 by theantediluvian because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 09:56 PM

originally posted by: JohnthePhilistine

I looked at both links and found both of them to be worthless, however your link is more offensive do the volume of the BS and because you seem to believe it. I've seen plenty of slick looking propaganda sites before and if I were a conspiracy buff, I might think there was a well funded group behind that one.a reply to: Kapusta

Oh please tell me what parts in my link to be worthless?

I doubt you read anything in the links.
Because if You had you would have read Top Islamic scholars denouncing extremisim and how the history of extremism came about .
It doesn't matter though because no amount of evedience will convince you otherwise.
edit on 06/17/2015 by Kapusta because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 10:06 PM
a reply to: theantediluvian

The topic is about Cultural Jihadism in North America and the funding.

What do you have about that?

And of course it only takes one psycho to kill a few hundred innocents.

posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 10:31 PM
There IS NO separation of church and state in Islam.

Not one iota.

It is a marriage made in hell of political,and religious views.

Denial aint just a river in Egypt.

It is a concerted effort by people into denying just what kind of enemy we are currently facing.

From the same people that tout the saintly hood of Mao,Stalin,Che, and Chavez.

edit on 11-12-2015 by neo96 because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 10:59 PM

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: xuenchen

So we're waiting for your intelligent summary proving this all wrong.

The Islamophobe Robert Spencer that's all that needs to be said.

You're having trouble justifying all this too I see.

Take your time, you can do it if you try hard enough.

I'm not trying to justify anything. I simply pointed out the Spencer is one of the sources for the article and he is well known for twisting facts to spread his Islamophobia.

posted on Dec, 12 2015 @ 03:41 AM
a reply to: xuenchen

This isn't only in America its happening right across Europe with the spread of that religion.

It is a totally cultural denial to think that western and islamic values match in any way. All religions preach peace, but its at the cost of doing what they demand and especially what their warped imams/priesthoods interpret as their religious needs etc.

Just look through Sharia and exactly what it demands to see islam has no respect for the laws of any land its practiced in because sharia overrules that particular land's legal system.

Loos also at the ideology of sharia allowing muslims to lie to non muslims in order to protect both islam and themselves. Just put those two ideals valued by islam together and you get sheer treachery against non muslims by the smiling apologists.

The fact that the mosques in France have been found to have huge amounts of weaponry in them should be telling every nation where these mosques are to innate going straight through them to check the so-called religion of peace and ask the damn question "what the hell do you think you are doing stockpiling weapons, getting ready to take over the country from within are you"?

Religious God botherers will achieve an overall majority wherever they go because they simply outbreed us. God help those of us who don't want religion in our lives and especially those born into that faith because it even demands your death if you want to leave it. Freedom of choice, something Western culture values goes out the window with religious dictatorship and you get imans whom you never elected prying into every aspect of your lives and telling you how to live along with their religious police ensuring you do was they tell you. Still it probably gets rid of corrupt politicians etc

posted on Dec, 12 2015 @ 12:49 PM
a reply to: Willtell

Uh, you do know that the Europeans didn't physically kill millions of Native Americans, right???

When Europeans came they had slow firing guns, that had to have gun powder packed into it before each shot. They didn't exactly mow them down with automatic rifles, also there weren't that many Europeans by number compared to the amount of Native Americans which would make killing millions of them extremely exhausting. There were like 400 men at a time, about the number that could fit on a few boats.

Most of the Native Americans died from diseases, one of which we know was deliberately given to them. But, they died from many other diseases that weren't purposefully given. Because of their isolation, they simply weren't immune to it. Disease did what a million men, with hundreds of thousands of guns couldn't.

You didn't see Africans dying from diseases after contact with Europeans, because even though isolated, they were close enough to develop similar immunities, the Native Americans were not. I truly don't think they knew that they wouldn't be immune and that even before Fransisco Pizzaro arrived deep into South America, there were entire populations that had been killed by disease before he had arrived. The disease spread faster than the men carrying them.

Just figured I would say that since, the atrocities committed against Native Americans were bad and while putting them on reservations was a way for them to keep their way of life, it still seems unjust. However, I think people can really exaggerate the past.

Also, with the crusades, remember that the crusades were a response to MUSLIMS killing Christians in Jerusalem. The pope at the time decided to intervene and rescue the Christians with the 1st Crusade. However, he and other popes got carried away and had several crusades after the first one. It went from rescue the Christians, to persecute the heretics. Weird. Another way, people use the crusades and mix up history.

There really is no equivalent to Islam. Till this day Muslims engage in slavery. There is no European equivalent to the atrocities that have been and are still being committed in the name of allah.
edit on 12-12-2015 by KesleyJ because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 12 2015 @ 01:03 PM
Everyone goes right after Christianity (which I personally think is retarded too mainly)

But why even take the time to post nonsense? Muslims are only 1% (which isn't true it's around 4%) etc etc... if I live in a building with 100 tenants and 1 of them wants to blow up my apartment, 2 of them want to convert me entirely and the 4th just wants Islamic rules for the building, i'll still need to do something about all 4 of those units.

posted on Dec, 12 2015 @ 03:59 PM

originally posted by: forkedtongue

originally posted by: Willtell
It’s easy to talk about the sins of people one has learned to hate

The human problem is that we never talk about the sins of those we love

I starred you, because you couldn't be more right.

But there is some fiction in your truth, and truth in your fiction.

I don't want the US to import muslims, not because I hate them, not because I was taught to feel as I do.

But because it is clear to anyone that can see without the fog of their preconceived notions the truth.

Most of them liked the way they lived and acted in the middle east.

They have no intention of integrating into western cultures.

They intend to suplant it with the culture they just left.

Which is why the government's of Europe have to crack down on information about the things they are causing to happen.

The left insists the tensions are our fault, because we don't want our cultural heritage to change.

I say, why should it.

Because I find ours to be vastly superior in every way to theirs.

I do not want my culture to change.

If we won't change to accommodate them, and they won't change to accommodate us.....

There will be violence.

It is a mistake to introduce them enmass into western lands.

It seems obvious to me.

I don't understand how it isn't obvious to everyone else.

Best post I have seen in weeks at least, it is amazing how many actually believe everything is just going to work itself out, and eventually blend into one happy world if we just CHANGE OURSELVES, and make sure those who are totally different and foreign to us DO NOT have to change.

It is ultimate hooliganism to think this is a good idea....

You don't combine all sorts of things into a blender and expect something Awesome or even BETTER to come out.

posted on Dec, 12 2015 @ 05:45 PM
A central part of "Islamic Supremacist" thought is to exploit American pluralism.

"Not all jihadist efforts to generate discord within the United States are predicated on economics. Jihadists understand that the “American Dream” is an expansive concept that includes notions about liberty, equality and opportunity"

Are you sure you are not a pawn in their game? Seems like everyone should ask themselves that question.

"Mukhaddab’s argument suggests that partisan shouting matches pitting national security concerns diametrically against civil liberties do not completely reflect the strategic threat jihadists pose"

Is this you? Seems like everyone should ask themselves that question.

"Jihadist thinkers assume that the American behemoth has a fragile core. Jihadists understand the power, but not the durability, of American ideals. Perhaps because of the religious grounding of their ideology, they do not fully comprehend the strength of a society built around secular concepts of liberty, equality and opportunity."

Are you living up to those ideals? Seems like everyone should ask themselves that question.

We won't win by playing a game defined by them.

posted on Dec, 12 2015 @ 05:50 PM

originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: xuenchen

So we're waiting for your intelligent summary proving this all wrong.

The Islamophobe Robert Spencer that's all that needs to be said.

Have you ever used the term Christianphobe?

posted on Dec, 12 2015 @ 05:52 PM

originally posted by: buster2010

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: xuenchen

So we're waiting for your intelligent summary proving this all wrong.

The Islamophobe Robert Spencer that's all that needs to be said.

You're having trouble justifying all this too I see.

Take your time, you can do it if you try hard enough.

I'm not trying to justify anything. I simply pointed out the Spencer is one of the sources for the article and he is well known for twisting facts to spread his Islamophobia.

And you are well known to use meaningless terms like "Islamaphobia" to deflect, silence dissent and avoid dealing with reality.

posted on Dec, 12 2015 @ 07:31 PM
Some are still denying what is happening within our own country, and furthermore these people could not even begin to grasp the reality of the threat we face. For our enemies, the implementation of Islamic law known as sharia is both the objective and the basis in which they routinely state their justification for attack. Our enemy openly declares that they are engaged in a global jihad as Islamic law serves as their doctrinal driver to commit murder in order to establish an “Islamic state”, or Caliphate, governed by Islamic law. If you want to know what our enemies threat doctrine is & what a doctrinal analysis of this threat looks like, read this. Islam, Jihad, and our Ignorance

posted on Dec, 12 2015 @ 08:18 PM
a reply to: PoliticallyShort

Even better is the jihadist playbook "The management of savagery"

Don't let them play you like a pawn...

If there is a solution it lies in being better than them, not worse.

When they start building "Ohio" class nuclear submarines we will really have a problem.

For now, and the forseeable future, they are just an annoying noise..

posted on Dec, 14 2015 @ 08:58 AM

originally posted by: Kapusta
a reply to: xuenchen

The author of that is a fearmongering moron .

Jihad watch... Really?

I will agree that the Ikwan Muslimeen (Muslim brother hood) is a wacky organisation. However the root of their goal is to bring all sects of Islam together to curb secular violence.
Here ..

Educate your self.

O sure, islamic extremists want "peace." Now I've heard it all.
edit on 14-12-2015 by dr1234 because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 14 2015 @ 09:07 AM
a reply to: xuenchen

Old but solid as a rock.

Islamic terrorism is generational.

They never learn.

At the exact same time that Muslim pirates were preying on American ships in the Mediterranean, American, British, Spanish, and French pirates privateers were preying off shipping in the Caribbean. We went to war with the North Africans because their navies were not as good as the European ones. The descendants of these privateers now work in the City and on Wall Street. Perhaps we never learn, either.
edit on 14-12-2015 by DJW001 because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 14 2015 @ 12:39 PM

originally posted by: Willtell
Did you people know that Moorish Islamic Spain allowed Jews to have their own religion and they thrived there, whereas Christian Catholic Spain murdered or kicked them out of Spain or forced them to convert?

Also in Turkey the Ottoman Turk Muslims allowed the Jews to thrive whereas in Christian Europe they had a hard time

That was then. It's different now. In 1492, Jews had plenty of beef with the Pope. Now it's Hamas. For good reasons.

One culture got better, the other worse.

Jews have been nearly eliminated from nearly all Muslim-majority states. At the end of WW2, there were 250,000 Jews in Baghdad; they'd been there since the Babylonian captivity. Now? Zero.

There were many thousands in Egypt, Yemen, Morocco, etc. There were many Jews who spoke Arabic as their first language, like Christians. The Jews were eliminated, and the Christians are, literally, in mortal danger.

edit on 14-12-2015 by mbkennel because: (no reason given)

edit on 14-12-2015 by mbkennel because: (no reason given)

new topics

top topics

<< 1   >>

log in