It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

We are a Nation of Guns, We are The Law

page: 5
21
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 02:02 PM
link   
In this day and age we can no longer afford the luxury of being tolerant of other cultures.
Those days are fading fast and we have to reconsider some of our policies.We will eventually
get to the point where we could be facing destruction if we stand back and do nothing.

We have allowed our government to open-wide our borders,not adhere to any current laws
pertaining to securing our borders,arresting those who do try.These same people are trashing
our laws and constitution and threatening our very existence.

We can't speak out against those threatening us because we have become afraid of being
labeled a racist or xenophobe!




posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 02:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Aazadan

A true,lawful gun owner would NEVER brandish their weapon.



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 02:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: Aazadan

originally posted by: forkedtongue
Um, guns serve more of a purpose then just killing.

Killing like war, is a last resort.

Most concealed carry vs criminal cases dont result in death, it results in the concealed carry brandishing or just showing the criminal the gun, and the criminal runs away.

Because the threat of death is usually more than enough to put the stop to their BS.


So you're going to brandish a weapon and the government will back down? What are you going to do when they come for your guns, and don't back off when you pull it out and start waving it around?


Um, did you forget about cliven bundy? What happened when armed federal agents were confronted by armed Americans willing to stand their ground?

That is right, they creapt away tail between legs.

There wasnt a single fatality or shot fired.

Showing that you are armed and determinted to not be ridden over rough shod by the gov was more than enough to put the federal government back in its place.

Wasnt the right fight in my oppinion, but the point still stands.

The gov knows it doesnt want to start this fight, they cant win it.

There are many more of us than there are of them, and all of the alphabet agencies people, and the military will not be on the governments side.

Sure some will, but not even close to all.

They are a paper tiger, a bully, if you let them they will take what they want, if you stand your ground, especially in numbers, they know they dont want that fight to happen.

The people have already had enough, it would by the final straw and they know it.



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 02:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: mamabeth
a reply to: Aazadan

A true,lawful gun owner would NEVER brandish their weapon.


BS!!

Let a banger or other trash try to mug me or break into my home, i most certainly will brandish my firearm, lawfully, and if necessary use it.



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 02:41 PM
link   
a reply to: forkedtongue

A question for you...would you ever "brandish" your weapon in public?
That is what I was referring to.In the privacy of your home is another
thing.



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 02:48 PM
link   
a reply to: forkedtongue

www.usacarry.com...


We gun owners have to really watch our P's and Q's on this topic,instead of swaggering
and shouting our rights. We should be more like...walk softly but carry a big stick! We
can't give anyone an excuse to disarm us.



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 02:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: mamabeth
a reply to: forkedtongue

A question for you...would you ever "brandish" your weapon in public?
That is what I was referring to.In the privacy of your home is another
thing.


If I am walking down the sidewalk and a guy tries to mug me, yes, yes I would.

I would pull out my gun, and aim it right at him, then if he persisted, I would send him to the morgue.



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 03:07 PM
link   
a reply to: forkedtongue

Which would be the right thing to do if your life is threatened.
Some time ago,a guy was driving his motorcycle.His shirt was
loose and blowing slightly in the wind.A car driving by him someone
saw the gun in his belt and called the police.The police tried citing
him for brandishing a weapon.



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 03:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: mamabeth
a reply to: forkedtongue

Which would be the right thing to do if your life is threatened.
Some time ago,a guy was driving his motorcycle.His shirt was
loose and blowing slightly in the wind.A car driving by him someone
saw the gun in his belt and called the police.The police tried citing
him for brandishing a weapon.


LOL, some folks....you just cant talk sense to them.

Though in some places, technically, if you have a CCP, it is your responsibility to keep it concealed.

That is why I live in Indiana, nice gun laws, nice rural folks in most of the state, just country folks that dont fear guns.

When I go into my local rural king, I expect to see at least several open carry folks, and nobody even looks twice, because it is so common place.

Love it out in the sticks.



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 03:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: sirlancelot

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: neo96

It would be nice if conservatives respected the First Amendment as much as they respected all the others...


Was it conservatives at the IRS who attempted to silence certain non for profits from exercising their 1st amendment?

Was it a conservative AG who tried to indict a right based news reporter?

Was is it a conservative potus who put the screws to Dinesh Dsouza for a minor offense in order to limit his 1st amendment rights?

Is it conservatives complaining about xmas tree and christians celebrating xmas?

Dude you can take your NWO and socialist non sense a insert where the sun dont shine!


Lol you brought up the "war on christmas" which has nothing to do with our government, the first amendment, or liberals, and everything to do with manufactured controversy invented by Fox News. Way to completely disqualify your opinion.


Actually it is relevant as you can see in the link below! Last time I checked the VA is a govt run organization.

Xmas references banned

Maybe if you didn't waste your time watching only lame stream media you would get it.



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 03:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: forkedtongue

originally posted by: Aazadan

originally posted by: forkedtongue
Um, guns serve more of a purpose then just killing.

Killing like war, is a last resort.

Most concealed carry vs criminal cases dont result in death, it results in the concealed carry brandishing or just showing the criminal the gun, and the criminal runs away.

Because the threat of death is usually more than enough to put the stop to their BS.


So you're going to brandish a weapon and the government will back down? What are you going to do when they come for your guns, and don't back off when you pull it out and start waving it around?


Um, did you forget about cliven bundy? What happened when armed federal agents were confronted by armed Americans willing to stand their ground?

That is right, they creapt away tail between legs.

There wasnt a single fatality or shot fired.

Showing that you are armed and determinted to not be ridden over rough shod by the gov was more than enough to put the federal government back in its place.

Wasnt the right fight in my oppinion, but the point still stands.

The gov knows it doesnt want to start this fight, they cant win it.

There are many more of us than there are of them, and all of the alphabet agencies people, and the military will not be on the governments side.

Sure some will, but not even close to all.

They are a paper tiger, a bully, if you let them they will take what they want, if you stand your ground, especially in numbers, they know they dont want that fight to happen.

The people have already had enough, it would by the final straw and they know it.


Brother well said! It's unfortunate far to many give up their rights and condemn those that are willing to fight for them!



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 03:37 PM
link   
a reply to: forkedtongue

I do have a C.C.W. and I keep mine in my purse!
A warning to the bad guys...here in the U.S. even
our senior citizens are armed!



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 03:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: sirlancelot

originally posted by: forkedtongue

originally posted by: Aazadan

originally posted by: forkedtongue
Um, guns serve more of a purpose then just killing.

Killing like war, is a last resort.

Most concealed carry vs criminal cases dont result in death, it results in the concealed carry brandishing or just showing the criminal the gun, and the criminal runs away.

Because the threat of death is usually more than enough to put the stop to their BS.


So you're going to brandish a weapon and the government will back down? What are you going to do when they come for your guns, and don't back off when you pull it out and start waving it around?


Um, did you forget about cliven bundy? What happened when armed federal agents were confronted by armed Americans willing to stand their ground?

That is right, they creapt away tail between legs.

There wasnt a single fatality or shot fired.

Showing that you are armed and determinted to not be ridden over rough shod by the gov was more than enough to put the federal government back in its place.

Wasnt the right fight in my oppinion, but the point still stands.

The gov knows it doesnt want to start this fight, they cant win it.

There are many more of us than there are of them, and all of the alphabet agencies people, and the military will not be on the governments side.

Sure some will, but not even close to all.

They are a paper tiger, a bully, if you let them they will take what they want, if you stand your ground, especially in numbers, they know they dont want that fight to happen.

The people have already had enough, it would by the final straw and they know it.


Brother well said! It's unfortunate far to many give up their rights and condemn those that are willing to fight for them!


It just hurts doesnt it?

I just dont understand the mindset.

I cant wrap my mind around it.



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 03:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: forkedtongue
Um, did you forget about cliven bundy? What happened when armed federal agents were confronted by armed Americans willing to stand their ground?

That is right, they creapt away tail between legs.


They backed down because an isolated incident wasn't worth a massacre. The government would have 100% won that war if they wanted to.

Now answer my scenario. The government passes a gun control law and mandates everyone turn in the weapons registered to them. Several people don't comply, the police are then dispatched to go door to door, arrest those who didn't turn in their weapons, and confiscate them.

Would you stand up on your own against 20+ policemen? Would you kill your own countrymen in that fight? If you fought back, do you think the government would have any problem in beating you with overwhelming force?



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 03:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: Aazadan

originally posted by: forkedtongue
Um, did you forget about cliven bundy? What happened when armed federal agents were confronted by armed Americans willing to stand their ground?

That is right, they creapt away tail between legs.


They backed down because an isolated incident wasn't worth a massacre. The government would have 100% won that war if they wanted to.

Now answer my scenario. The government passes a gun control law and mandates everyone turn in the weapons registered to them. Several people don't comply, the police are then dispatched to go door to door, arrest those who didn't turn in their weapons, and confiscate them.

Would you stand up on your own against 20+ policemen? Would you kill your own countrymen in that fight? If you fought back, do you think the government would have any problem in beating you with overwhelming force?


Yes I would fight, and so would tens of millions of more.

In a matter of days there wouldnt be any gov employees left to try it.

Because if they kill ten of us for every one of them, we still win easily.

Back to cliven bundy, no the gov backed down because they know it would have started a # storm they cant defend against.

Your view doesnt make sense, the gov doesnt mind a slaughter when swat raids happen or any manner of other situations.

It was because they were on equal terms.

And they knew it.

And have yet to mess with bundy since even once.

They knew they were full of crap in trying to strong arm him, and the people called his the govs bluff.

The gov backed down, just like all bullies do, when confronted with determined resistance.

They thought a show of force would make him roll over and take it.

When it didnt work, they backed down.



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 04:01 PM
link   
a reply to: forkedtongue

A star wasn't enough for this post



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 04:11 PM
link   
a reply to: forkedtongue

And this delusional thinking is the reason so many will be killed if ever a revolution about guns.

The thinking that you have as much support as you do or that you will win. If there ever was one...I am pretty sure tanks, cruise missiles, fighter jets or better equipped personal that would know the land very well would crash that movement with ease. Not too mention the majority would be groups of highly unorganized individuals who would have no leader in place or structure.

Sure you may have some vets but the majority would most likely be guys and gals who can hit a non moving target with great accuracy and declare themselves ready for war or people who play war on the weekend and think it is the exact same as the real thing or people who play COD and think they know what it takes to win.

I mean good luck and all, but be realistic.
edit on 11-12-2015 by theonenonlyone because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 04:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: forkedtongue

originally posted by: Aazadan

originally posted by: forkedtongue
Um, did you forget about cliven bundy? What happened when armed federal agents were confronted by armed Americans willing to stand their ground?

That is right, they creapt away tail between legs.


They backed down because an isolated incident wasn't worth a massacre. The government would have 100% won that war if they wanted to.

Now answer my scenario. The government passes a gun control law and mandates everyone turn in the weapons registered to them. Several people don't comply, the police are then dispatched to go door to door, arrest those who didn't turn in their weapons, and confiscate them.

Would you stand up on your own against 20+ policemen? Would you kill your own countrymen in that fight? If you fought back, do you think the government would have any problem in beating you with overwhelming force?


Yes I would fight, and so would tens of millions of more.

In a matter of days there wouldnt be any gov employees left to try it.

Because if they kill ten of us for every one of them, we still win easily.

Back to cliven bundy, no the gov backed down because they know it would have started a # storm they cant defend against.

Your view doesnt make sense, the gov doesnt mind a slaughter when swat raids happen or any manner of other situations.

It was because they were on equal terms.

And they knew it.

And have yet to mess with bundy since even once.

They knew they were full of crap in trying to strong arm him, and the people called his the govs bluff.

The gov backed down, just like all bullies do, when confronted with determined resistance.

They thought a show of force would make him roll over and take it.

When it didnt work, they backed down.


I would! no question! I don't have an arsenal and I would never nefariously use my weapons for criminal purposes but if it ever came to the scenario you aforementioned then those attempting to usurp my constitution rights would not be countrymen to me but the enemy of my countries constitution.

A better question knowing the result of losing the 2nd amendment right is why wouldn't all Americans do the same? Why wouldn't you?

Keep in mind if the govt takes all legally owned guns guess who has guns after that? The govt and the criminals!

Hypothetically good luck when the criminals and the socialist run the land and your watching carnage occur in AMerica. I' sure if this where to happen you would look back and think " what was I thinking"

All kinds of stupid going on in America right now!



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 04:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: sirlancelot



A better question knowing the result of losing the 2nd amendment right is why wouldn't all Americans do the same? Why wouldn't you?



I would think the majority of American are not as nuts about guns as the ones calling for a revolution for them.

Why should fellow American put their life on the line for you and your guns, if they cannot even get you to agree to discuss some reasonable measure about gun control?

Why should they care if you can have a gun, when you don't care who has one and puts fellow Americans at risk?

You don't care about those Americans who ask for better control of who has access to guns, why should they care about you?



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 04:20 PM
link   
a reply to: SPECULUM

My husband send me the article that speaks of how the US actually have the biggest army in the world, no other country surpass US when it comes with armed citizens.

No wonder the NWO wants the US unharmed,



new topics

top topics



 
21
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join