It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

100,000 troops, including Americans to be deployed in W.Iraq

page: 5
21
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 09:43 AM
link   
Reposting:

Yah hey, what Middle Eastern war, chapter thirteen?

Every single one they ever come out with runs just like this. And every time they do it they pre announce it just like they do today.

Take Vietnam for instance. First demonized in the Media as dirty Commies (back then), they were threatening the peace and sanctity, killing their people and the clamors begin, "something must be done". Oh no, there will be no boots on ground, just some "special" guys in an "advisory" role, then a "few more".

By then everyone forgets its against International law to invade other countries, accepting each phase after some protest because they get used to being told its necessary and acceptable.

From the beginning, they intended to topple the government, invade and occupy the targeted country, pulling the wool over people eyes with the constant propaganda pouring from the main stream, conditioning people to accept it.

Today in the land of internet the same conditioning is occurring from people on the internet, raising their voices in support of the lies, the subversion, the unjust wars for contrived reasons.

Those people are too obvious the way they come out every time someone tries to expose the truth about it, blah blah, its okay, its nothing, its necessary, we're helping…




posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 09:50 AM
link   
When the efforts to placate the masses fail, governments have wars to distract people from their differences and collective misery to point out things can always be worse than they are.

It's the banks you dummies, wars don't happen without banks, war does not happen without financing.

Of course those who declare war don't fight in them.

I say round up the people blabbering about it and send them off to fight it, especially to include those who declare it.

In the end it gets much worse, like Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which were bombed to stop those who produced the weapons to wage war.

Makes one glad everything is made in China in a way....



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 09:53 AM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

Reposting:

I don't remember you objecting to Russia sending troops in to Ukraine uninvited. Also, Russia has been far more involved in Syria than any NATO nation. It is almost as though Russia's overarching strategy is to create as many refugees as possible to put stress on the EU. Nah, Putin's the good guy here, right?



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 09:57 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001


Nah, Putin's the good guy here, right?


Russia isn't bombing the terrorists in Syria?
edit on 11-12-2015 by intrptr because: bb code



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 10:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: DJW001


Nah, Putin's the good guy here, right?


Russia isn't bombing the terrorists in Syria?


No, it's bombing ethnic Turks.



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 10:58 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

You mean Russian is bombing NATO?



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 11:01 AM
link   
The Main stream news media tells the people what the government wants it to.

They are never honest about where US troops are, how many, what they are doing.

They can't, what they do is against International Law and violates sovereignty of nations.

So quick, fabricate more anti Muslim and Putin did it Rhetoric.

Flood the airwaves, all the airwaves with distraction, disinformation and lies.

edit on 11-12-2015 by intrptr because: spelling



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 11:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: DJW001

You mean Russian is bombing NATO?


No. For the umpteenth time, even if Russia were bombing Turkey, it would not be bombing NATO. NATO is a treaty, not a country.



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 11:10 AM
link   
a reply to: lspilot6946


The West is determined to protect the Assets (AKA: ISIS/al Nusra/ AQ/all Sunni Jihad militants along with FSA who are also Sworn to Allegience to the Caliphate = IS)

see this article: www.washingtonsblog.com...
Why ISIS Exists: The Double Game

Posted on December 8, 2015 by WashingtonsBlog


this troop insertion is Obama driven, instructed by his neo-con & globalist puppet-masters like Brzezinski..
the ultimate Sunni-Shia conflict must be arranged to take place so the USA/NATO can then manage the various tribal warlords or else a surviving Caliphate = either Iranian or Turkish as the Seat of the surviving Islamic State


ISIS or Jihad must survive as a USA Asset At - All -Costs .... according to this regime at the WH


edit on th31144985440411202015 by St Udio because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 11:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: spy66


The US Train, coordinate and share intelligence With their vetted moderate rebels, who than hand this over to ISIS.


You have been repeating this claim for months now. If it is true, why send 10,000 uniformed American troops?


Russia have stepped up their campain and are killing US allies (rebels) on the ground. You know that is not a Secret.

The US are right now adjusting their campain which is a opposition to the Russian campain and gains on the Battlefield in Syria.

The RUssian are to the South and the US allies are to the North, and so are ISIS.

ISIS are useing US made weapons... like the TOW. Someone must have thought them how to use them, and who ever it was... at the end of the Chain there is an American.

The US allies are setting up trainigcamps for rebels all over the Place where ISIS are the strongest (Northern part of Syria/Iraqi boarder). Non of these camps are being attacked by ISIS..... Not that i know of. ANd we (Norway) have SF placet 15km outside Mosul togeter With 15 german SF. They have not seen any ISIS agression. We have had SF there for a year...and they have never been attacked. I find that quite odd when they are right inside ISIS back yard.


edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 11:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: DJW001

You mean Russian is bombing NATO?


No. For the umpteenth time, even if Russia were bombing Turkey, it would not be bombing NATO. NATO is a treaty, not a country.


NATO dont see it that way.

Jens Stoltenberg said that Turkish airspace is also NATO airspace. This was mentioned in cordans With the Russian vialation of Turkish airspace.

Ashton Carter said the same thing. Turkish arispace is also NATO airspace.
edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 11:21 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001


…For the umpteenth time…


Syria is the goal, the whole military, government and people. Doesn't matter how many times you spew the official line.

Actually, it does. Every post appears on the recent posts page and brings members here to read.

If the US admits to doing anything in the ME, rest assured it is misdirection away from what they are really doing in the ME.

Gotta keep the lies going.

Right now the escalation of troops in Iraq and Syria, US and French Carriers, the air campaign with thousands of sorties, is aimed directly at that country and the wider region.

No matter what terrorism, anti muslim or Putin did it rhetoric, the reality is EU, US (NATO) military invasion, occupation and subjugation of Syria.
edit on 11-12-2015 by intrptr because: spelling, what else?



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 11:48 AM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

There you go contradicting yourself again! If ISIS is an American operation, America ha already conquered Syria. Meanwhile, Russia continues to churn the area, forcing refugee to head for Europe. All the mirrors and smoke coming from the Kremlin cannot hide what is really going on there. How does it feel supporting a man who deliberately inflicts suffering on innocents in order to further his goals?



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 11:53 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

Assads still in power, you think he would be with his own people, Army, Terrorists, NATO and Russians against him?

Russia didn't cause the flood of refugees, the US covert terrorist and insurgency program since before 2011 and specifically the air strikes begun in 2014 did that.

I'm American dinkums, and anti war. Get anything right… lulz



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 11:57 AM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

I forgot... all those Russian planes with Syrian air force war paint that were bombing Syrian cities were really secret American terrorist planes in disguise.



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 06:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: intrptr

There you go contradicting yourself again! If ISIS is an American operation, America ha already conquered Syria. Meanwhile, Russia continues to churn the area, forcing refugee to head for Europe. All the mirrors and smoke coming from the Kremlin cannot hide what is really going on there. How does it feel supporting a man who deliberately inflicts suffering on innocents in order to further his goals?


Daesh doesn't occupy the whole of Syria... Assad is still in power and that is what NATO, the Gulf States and U.S. do not like. Assad is in favour of the wrong pipeline so they want to be able to replace him.
Russia and theirs on the other hand have everything to gain ($) by delaying any pipeline planned for the ME to Europe. GAZPROM has been lobbying in the EU for years, quite succesfully too. All the while trying to connect another pipeline to Turkey through the Black Sea.
There is no "the good guys" here in this game of $-chess. All sides are equally accountable for their Human Rights Violations, but the guise of "war" erases many a debt when sprinkled with enough misdirective MSM coverage.



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 10:00 PM
link   
Now the new world order takes over Syria!
That’s why they send the troops in.
End of freedom in Syria.



posted on Dec, 11 2015 @ 11:06 PM
link   
I think now it is pretty clear Assad is going to be forced to go. Iran is reported to be pulling out. This would only be likely if the Russian were giving up Assad. Putin announced that Russia was now flying air support and supplying the Free Syrian Army in coordination with the coalition. Later one of Putins people says Putin was mistaken they are not supplying the FSA just flying air support for them. No doubt after Assad freaked out from the earlier report. Russia wants out of Syria, it can not maintain this operation for long and things have not gone near as well as hoped. It is likely the Russians and the opposition will be coming to an agreement where Assad goes but, Russia gets an arms deal with the new Syrian coalition government.



posted on Dec, 12 2015 @ 03:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: MrSpad
I think now it is pretty clear Assad is going to be forced to go. Iran is reported to be pulling out. This would only be likely if the Russian were giving up Assad. Putin announced that Russia was now flying air support and supplying the Free Syrian Army in coordination with the coalition. Later one of Putins people says Putin was mistaken they are not supplying the FSA just flying air support for them. No doubt after Assad freaked out from the earlier report. Russia wants out of Syria, it can not maintain this operation for long and things have not gone near as well as hoped. It is likely the Russians and the opposition will be coming to an agreement where Assad goes but, Russia gets an arms deal with the new Syrian coalition government.


Have the Iranian government said that they will pull their troops out?

I saw two days ago that western media mentioned that Russia are supporting fractions of the FSA. But Russia have not confirmed that, or given a reason yet?



posted on Dec, 12 2015 @ 04:23 AM
link   
Hmm, with that many of your defence over seas, what a perfect time to strike your mainland.
Damn your government is Boldly stupid



new topics

top topics



 
21
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join