It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obama Administration says Trump is not eligible to run for office or other candidates who agree

page: 3
59
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:
+2 more 
posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 03:33 PM
link   
a reply to: matafuchs

Didn't Loretta lynch state that she wanted to make anti-muslim talk illegal?




posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 03:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Sremmos80

Actually we didn't allow any legal immigration from the mid 20s till the 60s

I'm not sure why everyone is so mystified by this old practice.



posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 03:36 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueJacket

No argument.

The more he talks, the more likely it is people will begin to catch on to the game.


+2 more 
posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 03:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: SlapMonkey
a reply to: matafuchs

*sigh* The comment is just a point meaning that if Trump thinks that he has the power to do that, he doesn't understand the limitations of the presidency.

Ironic, coming from the current administration, isn't it?


Apparently, if he was the president, he could potentially have the power to stop Muslim immigrants.
I saw this posted in a previous Trump thread. Pretty interesting stuff.

CREDIT TO: Stormdancer777 for posting this in the other thread

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

LAW LINK



(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate



posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 03:58 PM
link   
a reply to: matafuchs

This is telling of the fact that a PC person will get frustrated and just tell you what you can't do without rationality. This administration or its leftist supports foaming at the mouth angry because the USA is wanting more than ever, a return to a hard stance policy. Maybe it's time to stop immigration. Maybe it's time for an aggressive cabinet to undo the damage this one has done. Just a suggestion president Obama. Get ready for a revolting never before seen, the total rejection of the Democratic soft PC policy, the new American is the right American.



posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 03:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: gimphnoid
a reply to: matafuchs

This is telling of the fact that a PC person will get frustrated and just tell you what you can't do without rationality. This administration or its leftist supports foaming at the mouth angry because the USA is wanting more than ever, a return to a hard stance policy. Maybe it's time to stop immigration. Maybe it's time for an aggressive cabinet to undo the damage this one has done. Just a suggestion president Obama. Get ready for a revolting never before seen, the total rejection of the Democratic soft PC policy, the new American is the right American.

In your delusional dreams!



posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 04:02 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueJacket

So since we did it in the past it is fine now?

That was my point about the camps, I know there was restrictions, some bans, in the past. Doesn't mean we have to repeat the practice.



posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 04:13 PM
link   
a reply to: namelesss

I apologize, my reply was supposed to be extremely sarcastic, this is not my core belief. I imagine more than a few people thinking more extremely in the past week, being fueled by the see no evil do nothing politicians in power. What happens from here is anyone's guess.



posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 04:33 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

I wanted to see if anyone would bring that up. Good catch.



posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 04:38 PM
link   
a reply to: Sremmos80

It is and pretty much always has been legal to impose restrictions on who can and cannot immigrate. Those who are not citizens of the country do not have Constitutional protections or rights.

One of the most recent instances was in 1972 when a revolutionary Marxist was denied despite protestations of being denied his 1st Amendment speech protections. If we can deny based on speech, then if it is determined to be in the best interests of the American people (common defense?), a court could conceivably uphold severe restrictions on the immigration of Muslims to this country for a period of time.

That doesn't mean it's a good idea at present, but Islamic radicals consider themselves at war with us. How long until we understand that fact?



posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 04:40 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Right,I agree but this sitting president has expressed the most un-American rhetoric of any president. ..so what's worse?



posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 04:40 PM
link   
a reply to: MystikMushroom

I can't stand Trump, but I dislike Obama even more. But the reverse logic in this WH is priceless.

We known Obama has taken our country down and, wanting to make sure he completes his goal and finish the job is to tell people what can't happen, making voters more determined to vote in Trump!
Then goodbye USA.

Sorry, I cannot vote Trump. I'd rather not vote at all.



posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 05:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: mekhanics
a reply to: matafuchs

Trump's new insignia ...



Not new you have been living under that flag for a while now its just in front of you. Nsa warrentless phone taps, Wars with out congress approval, Check points inside the Us, Stop and frisk. I cant wait for Trump to win after he gets in and everyone sees he cant do nothing. Maybe Finally everyone will see that the President of the United States is a puppet and has no effect on what the people want.



posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 05:19 PM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko



Those who are not citizens of the country do not have Constitutional protections or rights.

Not true, they don't have all, but have some.
Especially if they are on on US soil, outside of that I assume you would be right.

I am 100% fine with a case by case basis,like yours in 72 where he met a restriction, but bans stop those that we should have no fear of and are escaping violence.
Those that want to do harm are going to find a way.

Slipperly slope thought here, but I feel like a ban like this is a step towards camps or something similar.
And I know for a fact our nation doesn't like to blame the many for the actions of the few.
Well at least in one major issue we have... That same issue loves to talk about how laws don't work either.



posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 05:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: PsychoEmperor
The Fact that the Sitting President deems himself the be-all/end-all to determine "who is qualified to run for President'


Where exactly did Obama say anything about Trump is not eligible?



posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 05:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: hellobruce

Where exactly did Obama say anything about Trump is not eligible?



Anything coming from the "official" White House is from Obama.




posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 06:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: hellobruce

Where exactly did Obama say anything about Trump is not eligible?



Anything coming from the "official" White House is from Obama.



I am having so much fun. Do they think this hurts Trump ?

It will boost him 10 more points...



posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 06:37 PM
link   
WOW, quite the case of choosing between "the devil you know or the one you don't".

Trump, whose honesty is quite literally ALL the way out there...
-OR-
A dynastic Bush or Clinton, of whom you will NEVER know their true intentions/agenda until long after the election.

/facepalm

I can do nothing but watch with eyes agog from the sidelines, but I do not envy you your options my American neighbours...(not that ours were any better.)




posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 06:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: MoonBlossom
WOW, quite the case of choosing between "the devil you know or the one you don't".

Trump, whose honesty is quite literally ALL the way out there...
-OR-
A dynastic Bush or Clinton, of whom you will NEVER know their true intentions/agenda until long after the election.

/facepalm

I can do nothing but watch with eyes agog from the sidelines, but I do not envy you your options my American neighbours...(not that ours were any better.)



Thank you!


At least you see the futility of all of these political arguments!

In the end? We ALL end up with someone selected to rule over us on a global initiative.



posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 07:01 PM
link   
a reply to: matafuchs




Obama Administration says Trump is not eligible to run for office or other candidates who agree


Too funny.

The Gunphobes crying about an Islamophobe.
edit on 8-12-2015 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
59
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join