It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obama Administration says Trump is not eligible to run for office or other candidates who agree

page: 2
59
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 03:01 PM
link   
*sigh*

The White House isn't saying there is some kind of law, or technical reason Trump should be disqualified...they are saying his statements and how he presents/carries himself don't live up to the office of president.

No, there's no law or some kind of qualification Trump doesn't meet...The White House is saying that people should reject his candidacy because of his opinions and what he's said.




posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 03:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: matafuchs
Aaaannnnnddddd Obama gives Trump another boost in the polls!


Confirmation:


+1 more 
posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 03:04 PM
link   
a reply to: MystikMushroom

Sorry, but this is a veiled threat to all GOP candidates. I wonder how many get audited before Obama leaves office...Trump included. They are not citing any law but this is overboard.

and remember Obama I am sure is still pissed because of the birthers which was started by Hillary and exploited by none other than Trump himself.




edit on 12pm31pmf0000002015-12-08T15:05:35-06:000335 by matafuchs because: (no reason given)


+3 more 
posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 03:05 PM
link   
Seems about par for this administration.

Obama wants complete control over what we say and think.
edit on 8-12-2015 by alien because: ..please do not amend peoples names...as per the sites T&Cs



posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 03:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: PresidentCamacho
Obama Bin Laden wants complete control over what we say and think.

Specify. I fail to see the context here.


+5 more 
posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 03:09 PM
link   
a reply to: matafuchs

If making idiotic statements disqualified you as a Presidential candidate then Barry wouldn't be President right now.



posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 03:11 PM
link   
a reply to: mekhanics

I'm more partial to this one myself.

Trump: Make America Hate Again




posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 03:12 PM
link   
What an absolute divisive character. He is whipping up a frenzy and people are starting to buy into it.

If he has to face Sanders, they are poles apart politically, it would probably be the most interesting election since Nixon/Kennedy?

Good luck USA, the rest of the world will be watching to see what you really think.



posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 03:12 PM
link   
Saying the obvious isn't being scared...

What he is proposing isn't possible, to the reasonable person that should make you think.

Oh and where does the link say that he isn't eligible??



posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 03:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: matafuchs
Obama Administration says Trump is not eligible to run for office or other candidates who agree

If delusional insanity and corruption bar one from holding public office, Washington, and every other state capitol, would be a ghost town!
Every clown in the present Amerikkkan Cirque du Freaque, from the dog-catcher in Lower Dismal Seepage, Iowa, to President, would be disqualified!
The healthy and sane have no desire to 'run the show', or tell others how to run their lives!
edit on 8-12-2015 by namelesss because: (no reason given)


+11 more 
posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 03:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: SkepticOverlord

originally posted by: PresidentCamacho
Obama Bin Laden wants complete control over what we say and think.

Specify. I fail to see the context here.


Ohh you know telling us who we can and can't vote for.

Telling us what we can say / think about Muslim immigrants.

Selectively choosing which laws should be enforced.

Selectively choosing which laws should be enforced against.
edit on 8-12-2015 by PresidentCamacho because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 03:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: SkepticOverlord

originally posted by: PresidentCamacho
Obama Bin Laden wants complete control over what we say and think.

Specify. I fail to see the context here.




Specific enough?



posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 03:14 PM
link   
a reply to: seagull

I disagree.

They didn't say he shouldn't be. They said not eligible which is entirely different.

Words have meanings.



posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 03:15 PM
link   
Make America hate...or make America more cautious?

When Rand Paul suggested just about the same thing, naming over 30 countries that should have extra scrutiny, they simply voted him down 10-89. No on e said he was racist or such. No one called him Hitler. He has very good ideas but the establishment does not want it.

His bill, titled the Stop Extremists Coming Under Refugee Entry Act, was presented and voted down.

There is nothing wrong with taking a step back and reviewing what is in place because right now it is not working.


+5 more 
posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 03:16 PM
link   
a reply to: seeker1963

It is hilarious. This election season is providing great theatre.

However, I did not know that we as a country were bound to allow anyone across our borders who wanted to come here.

And I'll bet that we weren't allowing in great numbers of Germans and Japanese during WWII just to prove how great, tolerant and all-around "not mean" we were.



posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 03:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Granite
Specific enough?

What does that InfoWars gobbledygook that Perl Harbor was a "false flag," have to do with the statement that President Obama wants to control what we say and think within the context of Trump?



posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 03:19 PM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

That's how I'd have phrased it, too, in all likelihood. Why use a short word, when two or three long ones are more fun?

Doesn't mean I don't know that he is, most certainly, eligible. You're right in that they probably should have phrased it differently, though.



posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 03:22 PM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko




They didn't say he shouldn't be. They said not eligible which is entirely different.



Where?

The article doesn't say that and the speech is saying that statement should disqualify him.

Says at the end that it is a statement that shows you lack the needed judgement to hold that position.



And I'll bet that we weren't allowing in great numbers of Germans and Japanese during WWII just to prove how great, tolerant and all-around "not mean" we were.

Ya we just rounded them up and put them in camps, not a dark spot in history at all.
edit on thTue, 08 Dec 2015 15:23:49 -0600America/Chicago1220154980 by Sremmos80 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 03:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: SkepticOverlord

originally posted by: Granite
Specific enough?

What does that InfoWars gobbledygook that Perl Harbor was a "false flag," have to do with the statement that President Obama wants to control what we say and think within the context of Trump?


It is obvious you did NOT watch the video...

It is all encompassing attach on the ENTIRE US Constitution by Obama...to a level equal to FDR during the lead-up to Pearl Harbor.

If you read the YT comments you will see verification of "top notch analysis".

ETA:

Provoking conflict, standing down our defenses, inviting attacks, then when the attack happens, using that attack for political purpose of politicians and the military industrial complex. Looks like Obama’s ISIS policy, but it could also describe FDR’s actions to get the US involved in World War II.

edit on 8-12-2015 by Granite because: this is what I should have said.



posted on Dec, 8 2015 @ 03:32 PM
link   
a reply to: seagull

No he should be...everyone gets an opinion.



new topics

top topics



 
59
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join