It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Who is lying? Certainly not me, many years ago when I fully understood the law (after stabbing a burglar and not even getting a caution) I held and continue to hold a mindset that no items on my person, or in my home were for the 'purpose of self defence' just merely items I wished to own for entertainment/amusement/hobby/work/general interest purposes.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: grainofsand
When we have to lie to our own Police officers through regarding our own self defense issues for fear of incriminating ourselves, in my opinion something has got to be wrong with the law.
I would follow a reasonable force course of action and articulate that well in all investigations.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: grainofsand
I bet through if you stabbed a burglar in this day of age there would be numerous questions. Which if you did not provide the correct pc answers to could potentially land you in a lot of trouble. Plus think we have discussed this before, you made sure the guy was ok and not dying until the Police arrived.
As to the Maglight I use one myself late at night when I take the dog out. Never had to use it for anything other than it's intended purpose through.
originally posted by: grainofsand
I don't really care if other #ty parents fail to understand publicly posted laws by the judiciary and government applying to England and Wales. It's their feral offspring who will do time, not mine.
I agree, but I don't write the law so I comply so I don't ever find myself in prison.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: grainofsand
Personally i think if you break into someone else's home with the intention of robbing the place you should take what you get.
If your course of action was one of defence then you would stay within the law. Cut the guys fingers off after you have removed the risk of harm to yourself or others then the law will # you up.
If it was my home and i managed to catch the suckers, there ether putting me down, or lets just say they are never going to play the Piano again.
No, your options are to use reasonable force to protect yourself or others from harm. You can really hurt someone with whatever is at hand if you can show that it was reasonable and born solely of fear for yourself or others.
Fact is if your home get screwed around these here parts the Police probably wont turn up on time to prevent the act occurring. So essentially your options are to act or sit there and get robbed, even potently raped and murdered. With kids and a Mrs to think about i know which option i would choose.
Appropriate is a wholly different beast to legally sanctioned.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: grainofsand
You dont need to cut them off, but breaking them several times seems rather appropriate.
The way i see it is simply to treat people in this world how you find them, and if you find them in you home unannounced and on the blag, well im not about to wait around to find out if the thief is nasty or nice, especially so at this time of year.
Why would you be worried that the police know you have a legally held crossbow?
originally posted by: blackcrowe
a reply to: Wide-Eyes
I was just offering some advice on the implications of buying weapons in the UK. Point being. The dealers are obliged to inform the police of the transaction.
I certainly didn't say go buy one.
But, yes. You're absolutely right. If it did get to that point. Police wouldn't be an issue.