$28,500 deposit made to San Bernardino shooter's account

I still don't buy the 'He had an argument and decided to jump the gun' on an already planned other target by hitting the party.

What I think is that they had been training...and ready to hit a target in downtown LA...and for whatever reason (perhaps they were seen surveying it)...they had to call off...or postpone the operation.

Farook already knew about the scheduled party...and it became their secondary target.
He went early to survey it...and decided it was worth going after.

originally posted by: InnerPeace2012
a reply to: Shamrock6

CIA false flag it is...it's just becoming too predictable. *sigh*

Some guy with the intention to have this mass murder tie in with "terrorism" and "gun control" had to have paid this murders to have done what they did.

Just what will happen if this funding indeed is traced back to someone who's got links to the CIA. Hopefully, someone is not paid to change the report before it becomes official, to point back to some random guy in the middle east with a big beard an all...

But didn't you just prove that it was a really bad false flag? You saw right through it.

Wouldn't they, the people who are orchestrating all of this, know to just make it as basic as possible? Or do you think they think that they know that you know that they know, you know? So they better do what you think they WOULD do, so as to make you think... But ahh they can't pull the wool over your eyes.

So obvious this is a false flag. because if it was any more obvious, it would be something akin to real life.

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: InnerPeace2012
By all means walk us through your false flag cia crap. Make sure to cite your sources so we can all see how you arrived at your opinion.

A: murder
B: Can't be real
C: Stuff -- FALSE FLAG!

same thing every time.

a reply to: InnerPeace2012

CIA false flag it is...it's just becoming too predictable. *sigh*

If anything the SB attack was a 'false flag' by Saudi Arabia and it's GIP, and Pakistani ISI to draw the US in to a ground war in Syria.

originally posted by: Shamrock6
Fox News is reporting that investigators have uncovered, but not announced, a number of large transactions made in the two weeks leading up to last week's shooting spree.

It remains unclear where the largest deposit, some $28,500 comes from. It may be a loan or may be a deposit by another party. Additionally, Fox reports several multi-thousand dollar withdrawals and transfers made in the days prior to the shooting. It appears the subject's mother, already under close scrutiny for her potential ties and statements, received multiple transfers from Farook's account. It appears that she received at least three transfers of $5,000 each.

Additionally, investigators are looking at a $10,000 withdrawal made by Farook as to whether it was done to reimburse Marquez, who appears to have purchased the two rifles for Farook.

www.foxnews.com...

< br />
I thought they already reported that Marquez originally purchased the rifles in 2011.

If the $10,000 was to repay Marques, Farook was one helluva late payer.

originally posted by: InnerPeace2012

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: InnerPeace2012
By all means walk us through your false flag cia crap. Make sure to cite your sources so we can all see how you arrived at your opinion.

Nothing anyone would say or link would clearly convince a mind that has already being made up to gobble what politically correct narrative.

I hope you do realize that, that the US attacks were highly predictable after the Paris events, as more of what happens after that is really, more debate on "gun control" and again the need for public support for more wars in the middle east.

I am not sure what sort of a tinfoil hat you got on there..

Peace

Honestly, you need to take a step back and THINK - you seem obsessed with "gun control" and the "gub'ment" trying to take you over.

Forget that, it's a red herring.

Have you ever heard of pascals wager?

If on the one hand you believe in God and there is no God, then you've won and lost nothing;

If on the other hand you don't believe in God and there is no God then you've won and lost nothing;

Alternatively if you don't believe in god and there is a God you've lost;

Or, if you do believe in God and there is a God then you've won;

Therefore the only logical course of action is to believe in God - just in case.

In your case:

Stick your head under the carpet, aim your vitriol etc at the gub'ment and the CIA and the FBI and the ATC and whoever else you fantasize over instead of the people committing the atrocities - and if you're wrong - you're doomed.

Therefore - in this instance - the only course of action that makes sense from a self preservation perspective is to believe in the official narrative, and prepare to tackle that alleged problem head-on.

Otherwise before you know it (if you're wrong) then you'll be finding yourself head-off at the hands of one of these nutters.

It's like heads I win, tails you lose.

You need to pick the option that gives YOU the best odds - not anyone else - just YOU.

$28,500 = 3,000,000 Rupees in Pakistani currency.
That sounds a lot like a nice round number for a foreign payout amount from someone in Pakistan.

EDIT:
Actually, 3,000,000 Rp is an amount that suggests 3 Terrorists were being financially supported.

If on the one hand you believe in God and there is no God, then you've won and lost nothing;

That's a loss...

originally posted by: Power_Semi

you seem obsessed with "gun control" and the "gub'ment" trying to take you over.

No, the Obama administration is obsessed with Gun Control, since with every gun related violence, the most predictive response is to get your guns.

And Obama has repeatedly said this over and over, if there is anyone obsessed with this it's has to be Obama, and am only providing an alternative perspective of what maybe a case of social engineering.

In your case:

Stick your head under the carpet, aim your vitriol etc at the gub'ment and the CIA and the FBI and the ATC and whoever else you fantasize over instead of the people committing the atrocities - and if you're wrong - you're doomed.

Therefore - in this instance - the only course of action that makes sense from a self preservation perspective is to believe in the official narrative, and prepare to tackle that alleged problem head-on.

Otherwise before you know it (if you're wrong) then you'll be finding yourself head-off at the hands of one of these nutters.

It's like heads I win, tails you lose.

Perhaps, you should take a step back and look in from the outside to get a clearer picture of what your government is capable of doing.

You need to pick the option that gives YOU the best odds - not anyone else - just YOU.

In order to increase your odds, you need to broaden your search for truth. The moment you find annoyance in any opinion that may be opposing to yours suggests that there is need to understand why it is so rather than shrug it off, you may learn a thing or two.

Peace

originally posted by: laminatedsoul

originally posted by: InnerPeace2012
a reply to: Shamrock6

CIA false flag it is...it's just becoming too predictable. *sigh*

Some guy with the intention to have this mass murder tie in with "terrorism" and "gun control" had to have paid this murders to have done what they did.

Just what will happen if this funding indeed is traced back to someone who's got links to the CIA. Hopefully, someone is not paid to change the report before it becomes official, to point back to some random guy in the middle east with a big beard an all...

But didn't you just prove that it was a really bad false flag? You saw right through it.

Wouldn't they, the people who are orchestrating all of this, know to just make it as basic as possible? Or do you think they think that they know that you know that they know, you know? So they better do what you think they WOULD do, so as to make you think... But ahh they can't pull the wool over your eyes.

So obvious this is a false flag. because if it was any more obvious, it would be something akin to real life.

Obama On San Bernardino Shooting: 'We Have A Pattern Now Of Mass Shootings'

Yes, we have an obvious pattern here, and it's not "mass shootings" at all.
- It's about too many coincidences of "police drills-trainings" and "mass shootings" in the same location on the same day.
- It's about Obama's every God dam speeches with "Gun" and "mass murder" references.

This is a clear cut social engineering of the masses to be aware of a "trending issue", and the obvious agenda of "Gun Control".

Why can't Obama just spit out, "We need your guns citizens!"

a reply to: Shamrock6

The whole point in this discussion about money and accounts is a PsyOp to make people agree that they live in more secure state if their bank accounts are under constant surveillance.

Too many sources on this thread, it's hard to tell which is accurate.

Disclosure of the unsecured loan the husband, Syed Rizwan Farook, 28, took out from San Francisco-based Prosper, a peer-to-peer lending service, offered a new glimpse into the money trail under scrutiny by investigators of last week's mass shooting.
Read more at Reuterswww.reuters.com...

Why an unsecured loan? They didn't have the income to support that figure did they? More digging needs to be done. The fact they took the loan just a short time before the attack could have been an indicator of them getting their financial affairs in order before the big act.

a reply to: Flatfish

Apparently, Marquez is also related to the Farook family (by marriage).

a reply to: InnerPeace2012

CIA false flag it is...it's just becoming too predictable. *sigh*

I found this video of a former NSA/CIA contractor, and it's really disturbing that this is really happening , if it's true that is.. Craft Intl mercenaries carried out San Bernardino shooting

a reply to: 0bserver1

. Craft Intl mercenaries carried out San Bernardino shooting

From Iran's own propaganda outlet...wouldn't expect anything less from them.

Funny that their source is the same person who said ISIS is a made up organization...yet even countries like Russia seem to think they are real, and so does Iran as they both have military campaigns around them.

Seems that story from Press TV shows they don't even care about a source enough to actually check him out before printing his story as though it is true.

Farook inspected many schools in the area and officials are concerned he may have been planning to plant remote-control bombs in them.
Bomb-sniffing dogs have been sent into schools he was known to have inspected.

a reply to: WeAreAWAKE

A pretty childish outlook.

You should change your name.

Try IjustWokeFromANap.