It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SunwolfNope,you are wrong.Nothing you say will change anyones mind.
Often one hears the argument "Well, X kills too, so do something about X first". Well, this thread is about guns, not about X. Start a new thread about X and I may (or may not) chime in if I feel I have something useful to add.
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: ForteanOrg
Often one hears the argument "Well, X kills too, so do something about X first". Well, this thread is about guns, not about X. Start a new thread about X and I may (or may not) chime in if I feel I have something useful to add.
I am curious about something.
Are you concerned about guns or the people that are dying?
The two are related, so about both.
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
a reply to: butcherguy
So by your logic, its perfectly justifiable for innocent people to be getting shot down in the street by mentally unstable individuals who had far to easy access to a firearm... just so long as people are dying from other causes as well?
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
a reply to: butcherguy
So by your logic, its perfectly justifiable for innocent people to be getting shot down in the street by mentally unstable individuals who had far to easy access to a firearm... just so long as people are dying from other causes as well?
Where the hell do you get that?
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
a reply to: butcherguy
So by your logic, its perfectly justifiable for innocent people to be getting shot down in the street by mentally unstable individuals who had far to easy access to a firearm... just so long as people are dying from other causes as well?
Where the hell do you get that?
Your (apparently) against any kind of gun restrictions and raise the fact that people die by other means to justify it... That's where the hell I got it from.
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
a reply to: butcherguy
So by your logic, its perfectly justifiable for innocent people to be getting shot down in the street by mentally unstable individuals who had far to easy access to a firearm... just so long as people are dying from other causes as well?
Where the hell do you get that?
Your (apparently) against any kind of gun restrictions and raise the fact that people die by other means to justify it... That's where the hell I got it from.
Where do you get that I am against any gun restrictions?
originally posted by: ForteanOrg
It's messy, it has a great impact on family and friends, it's often a waste of talent - most people commit suicide when they are still young. So, all in all, we seem to agree that we should do all we can to prevent uncontrolled impulsive suicide.
If, as most of you say, you actually never use your gun, or at best for target practicing or hunting, then why the abundance of lethal weapons in your closets, under you beds or in your toilets? Is it so hard to understand that you should not keep an atom bomb in your shed just because the aliens MIGHT land one day?
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: ForteanOrg
The two are related, so about both.
I will be a bit more specific.
Do you care about people that die from other causes?
Causes that are preventable?
So far we have seen reason to believe that you are against guns, not caring so much about people dying.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
Who are you kidding? You are more concerned with the method than the outcome.
I have a three story home, I keep a fire extinguisher on each floor in the outside chance I will need one not because I want to use any of them.
originally posted by: ForteanOrg
[
Actually - no. I'm concerned with both.
To put out a fire. Not to bash in the head of a stranger, I hope.
Hey, some people are confused, drunk or simply lost. They may wander inside your home.
Do you assume they will attempt to kill you...
Let me guess: you are far better than the police of course, you don't need the judicial system, you will judge yourself and kill the guy. And after the lights come on and you see he was a confused, pipesmoking drunk, you'll say to yourself: "So, what, I killed him. He should not have commited the crime of entering my premises without my consent. Stupid ass, serves him right. And hey, pipe smoking kills people. So, as long as they don't do anything about that, I won't give up my gun."
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
I do not believe you.
Of course, bashing someone's head in with a fire extinghuisher in a home invasion scenario could likely get you charged with felony assault, attempted murder or worse.
My home is locked, you cannot just 'wander in', you would have to commit a felony to get in there to begin with.
If someone forcibly enters my home I do not have to assume anything, they are there for criminal purposes.
your juvenile premises are comical.
If someone forcibly enters my home and approaches me or my family I am certainly not waiting for the police, nor do I have to as outlined by the laws of my state. I am well within my rights to protect myself and my family.
originally posted by: ForteanOrg
Of course you don't. You can't grasp it, can you: folks that live happy lives without the need for guns
So, don't do it.
Also, what strikes me is that it's not because you dont WANT to do it - it's because the judicial system will get you if you do. I bet you'd be complaining about that if it ever happened to you "Well, I don't get it. I killed a bad guy, and now I have to go to prison! It's not fair!"
My home is not locked. Not because I think that folks need to come in - but in case of a fire, I want my family to be able to get OUT.
I don't have that issue - if somebody enters my home, he does not have to force anything.
You can just walk in here, I'm in Europe and I'm safe. Even if a burglar might enter my home, chances are he won't have a gun, as that would make it far more plausible to be put away for a long time when caught. Also, he knows I don't have a gun either, so why the fuzz..
But let's see: so you lock your doors WHILE YOU ARE AT HOME? Talk about paranoia.. man, where do you live for gawds sake..?
Coming from a man that LOCKS HIS DOORS WHEN HE IS AT HOME..
See, that's the problem, right there. If somebody is in your home, you assume he will attack your family. Where I live we assume the guy is lost and we offer him help. See the difference?
We're done, methinks.
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
a reply to: butcherguy
So by your logic, its perfectly justifiable for innocent people to be getting shot down in the street by mentally unstable individuals who had far to easy access to a firearm... just so long as people are dying from other causes as well?
Where the hell do you get that?
Your (apparently) against any kind of gun restrictions and raise the fact that people die by other means to justify it... That's where the hell I got it from.
Where do you get that I am against any gun restrictions?
So are you saying you'd be all for federal laws that restrict guns as much as California or Canada... I'm confused dude.
originally posted by: ForteanOrg
Coming from a man that LOCKS HIS DOORS WHEN HE IS AT HOME.
originally posted by: vor78
originally posted by: ForteanOrg
Coming from a man that LOCKS HIS DOORS WHEN HE IS AT HOME.
This statement right here pretty much sums up the entire disconnect. The vast majority of people in the United States lock their doors when they're at home. Every single police department and sheriff's office in this country is going to recommend that you do that. As odd as that may sound to you, its 'common sense' over here.
There are significant differences in our cultures and they go quite a bit deeper than just gun control, it would seem.