It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JuJuBee
How can they take such pictures with no source of light?
At this point, in time, "they" can tell us ANYTHING and we'll believe it as truth.
But your theories have nothing to do with the current scientific knowledge.
originally posted by: GaryN
But your theories have nothing to do with the current scientific knowledge.
Well if you do some research you will probably find that current scientific knowledge recognises the emission of blue tinted light from UV excited tholin molecules. Ain't the Internet wonderful?
But does Pluto glow, and does it glow blue? The answer is no. Pluto is reddish, due to visible sunlight reflected off tholins.
That's a very confused post.
originally posted by: GaryN
a reply to: JuJuBee
There is a source of light, but it is not visible light from the Sun. It is from the UV fluorescence of tholins (or other molecules) in the atmosphere of Pluto. Solar UV emissions will travel indefinitely with no loss of energy, whereas visible light falls of with the inverse square rule and would be extremely weak out there.
The images form a strip 50 miles (80 kilometers) wide, trending (top to bottom) from the edge of “badlands” northwest of the informally named Sputnik Planum, across the al-Idrisi mountains, onto the shoreline of Pluto’s “heart” feature, and just into its icy plains. They combine pictures from the telescopic Long Range Reconnaissance Imager (LORRI) taken approximately 15 minutes before New Horizons’ closest approach to Pluto, with – from a range of only 10,000 miles (17,000 kilometers) – with color data (in near-infrared, red and blue) gathered by the Ralph/Multispectral Visible Imaging Camera (MVIC) 25 minutes before the LORRI pictures.