It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: intrptr
Or is that your definitive proof of "US Support for IS"
No, my posts on the last page show that the US and EU (NATO) are trying to conquer Syria. The UK, a member of NATO, has just announced it will begin bombing missions in Syria to assist in that endeavor.
Bully for you. You have rejoined the nations that support International Terrorism.
originally posted by: andy06shake
Seriously you think we would ever be conquered by ISIS/ISIL or there like? Now that really is stretching it!
You do relies that we live on an island and last time i looked ISIS were not exactly a naval power!
originally posted by: Tyrion79
a reply to: MrCrow
Question, what's the bigger threat?
1. A suicide bomber taking as much innocent lives as possible.
2. An airplane carpet bombing an area, taking all lives within extended range.
Nr.1 is considered terroristic, nr.2 is considered necessary, because of it.
Radicalism needs fertilisation, that the military provides.
In other words, increased bombing = increased terrorism.
Why isn't anyone considering an option 3?