It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: BatheInTheFountain
You do realize they're working according to their timetable, not yours, right?
Like...they have a job to do. Giving you names is pretty low on the list of priorities.
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: texasgirl
originally posted by: Shamrock6
LA Times is running a report that Feds are thinking the subject who was inside the building may have been there to ensure a specific person or persons were there before the attack started.
So there may have been someone very important at this party/event that needed 'taking out'? And then made to look like a random shooting?
I was thinking that.
I had thought of that too.
Maybe it was because I watched the movie 'Jack Reacher' last night. It used that premise.
originally posted by: Aqualung2012
a reply to: MagesticEsoteric
I've been saying that since the beginning of this whole thing. Right from the first interview with Sergeant Whats-her-face, Officer Greta Van Sustren.
originally posted by: WeAre0ne
a reply to: MagesticEsoteric
A bunch of people were just killed. Doesn't matter what you think. Something crappy happened, period.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
A dispute worthy of masks, armour, camo and the possibility of the Chair/suicide by cop???
I find that a little hard to believe at the moment.
originally posted by: ISawItFirst
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: BatheInTheFountain
You do realize they're working according to their timetable, not yours, right?
Like...they have a job to do. Giving you names is pretty low on the list of priorities.
Yes they do. And their employers want details!