It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

San Bernardino, Calif., fire units responding to reports of 20-victim shooting incident -

page: 130
178
<< 127  128  129    131  132  133 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 12:18 AM
link   
a reply to: Destinyone

It is possible, I don't think so. Would have to have one hell of a lawyer IMO to get that deal.


Police chief thinks there is some planning, can't really disagree completely.




posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 12:18 AM
link   
a reply to: rockintitz

Fox reported that they were wearing them.

@Sremmons... He said that they did feel like they were explosive devices. 3 of them that they took care of.



posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 12:18 AM
link   
They have not ruled out terrorism.

Translation:

This is an act of terrorism but we're going to try and do everything to try and rule out terrorism. It would be easy to rule out terrorism if he was just a disgruntled employee.

Saying it wasn't spur of the moment tells you this is terrorism. This reminds me of the terrorist attack at Ft. Hood.



posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 12:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: Kangaruex4Ewe
a reply to: rockintitz

Fox reported that they were wearing them.

@Sremmons... He said that they did feel like they were explosive devices. 3 of them that they took care of.


I thought he said they were suspicious devices, but didn't confirm whether they were explosive. Either way, he said they disposed of them.

ETA...nope, he just said pipe bomb design
edit on 3-12-2015 by CIAGypsy because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 12:20 AM
link   
a reply to: CIAGypsy

Chief said they were pipe bomb devices.



posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 12:21 AM
link   
so who was the woman that was shot? as it looked pretty white in the photo



posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 12:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: CIAGypsy

Chief said they were pipe bomb devices.



Yeah, but he also said the one thrown from the vehicle wasn't explosive in nature. Apparently they weren't skilled at making pipe bombs....



posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 12:22 AM
link   
dead couple were married



posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 12:22 AM
link   
a reply to: CIAGypsy

Just said the one at the SUV wasn't explosive but did sound like the ones at the center were.

@IAMTAT well he said design, but I might just be splitting hairs there.



posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 12:22 AM
link   
a reply to: Kangaruex4Ewe

If that is true then it definitely suggests a planned attack. And more attention seeking behavior.



posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 12:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: RalagaNarHallas
so who was the woman that was shot? as it looked pretty white in the photo


Tashfeen Malik....his wife



posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 12:22 AM
link   
Only 1 officer wounded non life threatening injury.



posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 12:23 AM
link   
One officer was wounded. He is still in the hospital but is in good condition.



posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 12:23 AM
link   
Now, if the joint task force was involved do we think that just was prudent to say?
The question of terrorism was asked, seemed like it would be an opening to talk about that.



posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 12:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Destinyone

It is possible, I don't think so. Would have to have one hell of a lawyer IMO to get that deal.


Police chief thinks there is some planning, can't really disagree completely.


Early on,and I've been in this thread from the get go, , too many witnesses from the shooting area said Farook left 1/2 hr early, then returned with TWO others. Multiple reports of 3 shooters .

Des



posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 12:23 AM
link   
So he got angry. Left.

Built some pipe bombs and called his freinds to grab guns and join him.

Changed into to "tactical gear" and mounted go-pro cameras.

All within twenty minites until he returned to commit some "work place violence".



posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 12:23 AM
link   
a reply to: CIAGypsy

ah i guess i got the wrong fb page because the wife i saw him being married to was Tatiana Farook



posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 12:24 AM
link   
youtu.be...

yeah this was not terrorism...........



posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 12:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: Deny Arrogance
So he got angry. Left.

Built some pipe bombs and called his freinds to grab guns and join him.

Changed into to "tactical gear" and mounted go-pro cameras.

All within twenty minites until he returned to commit some "work place violence".

Sure. That works. They'll go with that.



posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 12:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sremmos80
Now, if the joint task force was involved do we think that just was prudent to say?
The question of terrorism was asked, seemed like it would be an opening to talk about that.


The investigation is still ongoing.

Were the weapons legal.
If not who bought them?
Who sold them?
Did they get help from family or friends
Did anyone know they were going to shoot the place up...
etc etc etc.
edit on 3-12-2015 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
178
<< 127  128  129    131  132  133 >>

log in

join