It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LSU0408
originally posted by: Belgianbloke
a reply to: Signals
One of the things that struck me when I first saw the shooter was the similarities between him and Holmes.
I mean seriously, even the lazy right eye.
localtvkstu.files.wordpress.com...
s2.reutersmedia.net...
Dare I say monarch mind control...
It's always Colorado.
originally posted by: Signals
What a coincidence, huh?
talkingpointsmemo.com...
Dear's public defender, Daniel King, is known for handling tough capital punishment cases. Holmes–who was eligible for the death penalty after killing 12 people and injuring 70–was sentenced to life in prison without parole in August. The sentencing was a surprise, especially for prosecutors who focused much of their case on the heinousness of the crime, according to a report from the Wall Street Journal.
Wonder if all the handlers are the same?
It's so in your face these days it's unbelievable. They had to seal the records to make sure to get the story straight, I reckon.
originally posted by: Azureblue
originally posted by: Signals
What a coincidence, huh?
talkingpointsmemo.com...
Dear's public defender, Daniel King, is known for handling tough capital punishment cases. Holmes–who was eligible for the death penalty after killing 12 people and injuring 70–was sentenced to life in prison without parole in August. The sentencing was a surprise, especially for prosecutors who focused much of their case on the heinousness of the crime, according to a report from the Wall Street Journal.
Wonder if all the handlers are the same?
It's so in your face these days it's unbelievable. They had to seal the records to make sure to get the story straight, I reckon.
Your certainly right in your views there mate.
Apparently, the 'defending' lawyer for the Boston Bomber said straight up in her opening submission that her client as guilty as charged there after everything was about getting nothing more than a lighter sentence.
In 1996 when 37 people died in Tasmania, the 'lawyer' representing the accused did everything he could to get his client to plead guilty. He even prevailed on the blokes mother. Eventually the bloke, who had an intellectual age of 13 years and had been placed into financial administration, pleaded guilty so he could get a TV in his cell.
In 2006 the 'lawyer' was eventually disbarred from practicing law. seems to be a re-occurring theme doesn't it
originally posted by: Shamrock6
originally posted by: Azureblue
originally posted by: Signals
What a coincidence, huh?
talkingpointsmemo.com...
Dear's public defender, Daniel King, is known for handling tough capital punishment cases. Holmes–who was eligible for the death penalty after killing 12 people and injuring 70–was sentenced to life in prison without parole in August. The sentencing was a surprise, especially for prosecutors who focused much of their case on the heinousness of the crime, according to a report from the Wall Street Journal.
Wonder if all the handlers are the same?
It's so in your face these days it's unbelievable. They had to seal the records to make sure to get the story straight, I reckon.
Your certainly right in your views there mate.
Apparently, the 'defending' lawyer for the Boston Bomber said straight up in her opening submission that her client as guilty as charged there after everything was about getting nothing more than a lighter sentence.
In 1996 when 37 people died in Tasmania, the 'lawyer' representing the accused did everything he could to get his client to plead guilty. He even prevailed on the blokes mother. Eventually the bloke, who had an intellectual age of 13 years and had been placed into financial administration, pleaded guilty so he could get a TV in his cell.
In 2006 the 'lawyer' was eventually disbarred from practicing law. seems to be a re-occurring theme doesn't it
And if you did an ounce of research you'd learn the bomber's attorney is a vehement anti-death penalty attorney. She doesn't take cases on guilt or innocence, she takes death penalty cases to try and prevent a death sentence.
It's literally her life's mission. So tell me again why it's suspect that she did in Boston what she's done her entire career?