It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: stormbringer1701
this is a dude that told neighbors he installed a metal roof to prevent the govt from beaming mind control signals into his head. he also said the govt was using grammar to control people's thoughts. in short he was as crazy as a june bug. he would have fit in perfectly in some of the subforums of this site. That hardly makes him a christian terrorist.
I've always said "white or right" will earn you the terrorist brand, and being a racist comes standard.
originally posted by: LSU0408
originally posted by: stormbringer1701
this is a dude that told neighbors he installed a metal roof to prevent the govt from beaming mind control signals into his head. he also said the govt was using grammar to control people's thoughts. in short he was as crazy as a june bug. he would have fit in perfectly in some of the subforums of this site. That hardly makes him a christian terrorist.
I haven't read much into this guy, but that's crazy... I guess liberals will use any tragedy they can to pin some type of religious terrorism on a white guy that didn't fit the lifestyle of their utopia. Unreal.
"abrogation." I think you should read about it in context of islamic theology.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Jobeycool
This is not true if you actualy take the time to read the entire Quran and entire Bible and understand the huge difference when Jesus Christ taught about the new covenant.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: reluctantpawn
That's an interesting cop-out you got going on there. Employ a No True Scotsman Fallacy so that you don't have to admit that Christian terrorists can be just as evil as Muslim terrorists.
Have you actually read the entire Quran? Though none of what you said here changes the fact that this argument is still a No True Scotsman fallacy.
originally posted by: infolurker
originally posted by: Wookiep
It seems there are a lot of seething 'liberals' foaming at the mouth, waiting for any incident to give an opprotunity to slam white christians, especially 'right wing' ones, its almost like some sick obsession.
I see it everyday, not just here on ats. Its like millions of Americans would love to see any white conservative, especially white christian conservatives either tried as terrorists or given the death penalty. It's hard to see, with all their hate which one they would prefer. # is going crazy around here latetly.
These are the same people who preach against 'hate' everyday, but have zero capacity to look inside and see their very own incredible hatred toward fellow human beings.
Meanwhile, these same people, many atheists, almost make some type of life goal to defend muslims..when we quite literally see countless deaths and acts of terrorism daily from people who are proclaimed muslins, every damn day. But still they cant stop spewing their vitriol toward anything and everything 'christian' because ALL christians are evil white, ring wing vile people.
I dunno what the hell is going on, there is a serious explosion of hate lately, and from where im sitting, it all seems to be coming from the left, and trendy millenials who just want to seem cool to be a part of something.
God, i hope this all ends soon.
Ding, ding, ding.
You win the award for outstanding perception of Progressive policy today.
I doubt it will end anytime soon. I believe their insane hatred is intense, driven, and constantly directed. It will only end once they have eradicated their perceived political enemies and effectively shut everyone up who disagrees with them.
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
a reply to: infolurker
Did they say was caused or may have been caused? Is it speculation or claiming as fact? Got any examples? Or is this hyperbole and rhetoric?
ETA: Would love to see a video of a screaming progressive too.
the islamic concept of abrogation is simply that when suryas of the koran conflict the later suryas supercede the earlier ones. In the earlier parts of the koran (written when Mohammed thought that Jews and Christians would convert peaceably) were the more pacifistic in dealing with the "people of the book." Later on when he found that this would not happen the later suryas started urging murder and war in conflict with the earlier writings. This meant that the koran contradicted itself. So islamic scholars and leaders conceived the concept of abrogation.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: stormbringer1701
I'm not sure what this has to do with my post you quoted. You need to elaborate more on what you mean. What does abrogation have to do with the person I was talking to having actually read the Quran or that saying that someone isn't a Christian because he does something unChristian in nature isn't a no true scotsman fallacy?
originally posted by: Fromabove
It seems the the OP has a dislike for Christians. Anyway, the shooter was a nut job no matter what he thought he was. Saying you are something but then never living according to it's standards does not make you what you claim to be.
The difference between a nut job and an Radical Islamic Terrorist is that what he does is actually written in the book he follows. It says to hate the infidel and the Christian and the Jew. To kill them and terrorize them. To deceive them, and to lie to them. It says to do all that, so they do.
If someone calls themselves a Christian and then does this, he cannot actually be a Christian, even if he claims to be one. He contradicts everything it means to be Christian.
Note; If you plan to defend yourself by going back to early times when the average person knew little or nothing of the Bible and what it said, that would not be an argument. And even the leaders of their day were not really Christian if they were evil. Many pretended to be Christian for power such as in medieval Europe. They were not Christian even thought they claimed to be so. To be a Christian you have to believe in Christ and follow and do what he taught; nothing else.
originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: theantediluvian
Ah yes, the "Rhetoric"
Let's hear your solutions, maybe with "hate speech" laws against groups you disagree with?
originally posted by: LSU0408
originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: theantediluvian
Ah yes, the "Rhetoric"
Let's hear your solutions, maybe with "hate speech" laws against groups you disagree with?
Hate speech laws would put MSNBC and many other liberal news outlets out of business.
originally posted by: Fromabove
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Disclaimer: 1. Anyone claiming to be a doctor having never been taught or schooled in the practice of such is an impostor and cannot be said to be a doctor. 2. being in an auto repair shop does not make you an auto mechanic repair man.
You have to read the Quran and understand abrogation to see that all the hate and death are commands not requests.
Hope that clears it up. If not, I leave you to your imagination.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Fromabove
Do you see what you did there?
You simplified Islam so that it is easier to blame and defined Christianity in such a convoluted way as to make it difficult to apply the actions of Christian extremists to Christianity.
Do you think we all stupid and can't see how ignorant that post is?
You do realize that it's not politically incorrect to call a Christian a terrorist, right? You're falling right into your PC political arms by doing so, and it's your side that set the bar so low. You've already cowered, and can't even see it. Pathetic.
i have seen these lists of contradictions. most aren't contraditctions at all but matters of improper translation or unfamiliarity with extinct usage. For example you can say that genesis contradicts itself on the "day" on which Adams was created from chapter one of Genesis to the very next chapter. That contradiction exists only in the english translation and has to do with improper reliance on transliteration and ignorance of hebrew grammatic structure and modifiers. there at least a critic has good reason to criticize the apparent contradiction. but critics are so eager to catalog "contradictions" that The will accuse Jesus of contradicting the torah when he advises that you must hate your parents which is merely down to usage. hate in the proper context means to love less. the contradiciton is thus imaginary. That is not to say that there aren't contradictions that may be real such as when various books of the four gospels give different locations for various of Jesus' sermons.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: stormbringer1701
So what does any of that have to do with the post you quoted? The bible is often contradictory too, yet many don't have a problem worshiping that as well.