It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

California Begins Injecting Children with Mercury...

page: 1
51
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+27 more 
posted on Nov, 30 2015 @ 04:21 PM
link   


California begins injecting children with mercury... flu shot 'shortage' cited as bizarre justification... state safety laws nullified to push vaccines...

California Health and Human Services Agency Secretary Diana S. Dooley has just cast aside a law intended to protect children from mercury in vaccines.

"I am granting a temporary exemption from California Health and Safety Code Section 124172 for seasonal influenza vaccine with trace levels of thimerosal to be administered to children younger than three years from October 9, 2015 through December 31, 2015, because the current supply of thimerosal-free vaccine for young children is inadequate," declares Dooley.

California Begins Injecting Children with Mercury...

Well this is disgusting. Apparently California is suspending their own safety protocols to ensure that every child gets their shot of mercury ladened flu vaccine. The sad part is there is no choice for parents. Do you want to attend school in California? Then get your mercury injection.

I am NOT anti-vax.

I have received vaccines in the past after doing the research and I have also turned many down even though my doctor was pushing them. The key is I have a choice and people in California don't.

They KNOW that these shots containing Mercury are dangerous for young children yet they still insist on forcing them on these families. Nevermind that they rarely even have an effective flu vaccine because the viruses mutate too fast these days. Even though it is likely to be ineffective to prevent the flu they are going to force a guaranteed dangerous shot on children.

This is plain evil. If there was a choice I could just say no, but forcing them on you to attend school is insanity. There are some good vaccines and I got my daughter immunized against most common childhood diseases, but I had the ability to say no to flu shots and Gardasil and other junk that were unnecessary and possibly dangerous.

Taking away freedom of choice from people is unAmerican and just plain wrong. I don't accept that people can just not send their kids to school. If education is a fundamental right then so should the right to make informed decisions regarding your family's health.



edit on 2015/11/30 by Metallicus because: Fixed Spelling Error...Text Unchanged




posted on Nov, 30 2015 @ 04:26 PM
link   
This is not a good thing. Doesn''t seem like a good trade-off. It's been a while since I've had a child in school, but since when are flu shots mandatory? This seems very un-Californialike, from your source:


Remember, too, that California now mandates vaccines for all children who attend public school thanks to the passage of SB 277, pushed by vaccine industry puppet Dr. Richard Pan.


Is it me or are they pushing this year's flu shot harder than in years past?



posted on Nov, 30 2015 @ 04:28 PM
link   
Every flue shot has mercury in it.................


+3 more 
posted on Nov, 30 2015 @ 04:29 PM
link   
a reply to: ~Lucidity

It sure seems like they are pushing it hard this year. My doctor went nuts when I told her I wasn't going to take the flu shot. I was actually surprised how insistent she was being about it because she is normally pretty laid back.



posted on Nov, 30 2015 @ 04:30 PM
link   
California is the land of measles, remember?

They are not pushing flu vaccines where I'm at any more than normal, so if they are doing it in California, I'm betting the measles outbreak is a factor.



posted on Nov, 30 2015 @ 04:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Metallicus

Same exact thing here.

They tried to push it on me about 4-5 times during a visit for a sinus thing in October. And both the doc and nurse got pretty adamant about it too, to the point where I just had to say, "No!"

Guess the joke will be on me if this year's shot actually helps and I wind up dying of influenza, but still....


+4 more 
posted on Nov, 30 2015 @ 04:32 PM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

I don't mind them pushing it, but making it mandatory and ignoring their own state safety protocols is insane.



posted on Nov, 30 2015 @ 04:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: ketsuko

I don't mind them pushing it, but making it mandatory and ignoring their own state safety protocols is insane.


This is California. Nothing they do out there surprises me.



posted on Nov, 30 2015 @ 04:34 PM
link   
Just out of curiosity, does this dose of mercury pose any more danger than eating tuna once a week?


+6 more 
posted on Nov, 30 2015 @ 04:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bluntone22
Just out of curiosity, does this dose of mercury pose any more danger than eating tuna once a week?


Few people feed tuna to children this young. They are forcing this shot on children under 3 y/o and it is dangerous enough that California is overriding their own safety protocols to push this shot on these kids.



posted on Nov, 30 2015 @ 04:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Metallicus
Even before reading this "news article" from Natural News (cough cough), I did the tiniest bit of clicking links and found that on one page they claim 50,000 ppb, and on the link they provided, it states, 51 ppm. Sure the bigger number is more scary but they are the same.

Be interesting to actually read the report.

I'm sure people know that Thimerosal is about 50% mercury, but they don't actually make the pill out of 50/50 split. I wonder exactly what the "trace" amounts are contained in this letter.
I also don't live in California, but, is it mandatory to have your child get the flu shot?




posted on Nov, 30 2015 @ 04:47 PM
link   
a reply to: Metallicus

Any parent has the right to deny the flu shot it's not required for school.



posted on Nov, 30 2015 @ 04:53 PM
link   
a reply to: Metallicus


"I am granting a temporary exemption from California Health and Safety Code Section 124172 for seasonal influenza vaccine with trace levels of thimerosal to be administered to children younger than three years from October 9, 2015 through December 31, 2015



Do you want to attend school in California? Then get your mercury injection.


Probably not too many 2 year olds attending public school.



posted on Nov, 30 2015 @ 04:55 PM
link   
a reply to: Metallicus

The amount of ethylmercury in vaccines prior to 1999 is so insignificant that it is harmless as it breaks down into non-volatile chemicals as soon as it enters the human body. Said mercury is being replaced in modern vaccines. There has never been a mercury overdose, ever, relating to vaccines.

People read mercury and vaccines and they freak out because they don't understand how the human body or chemistry works. In my opinion, a super small chance at getting temporary redness and nausea, beats dying from some horrible disease.

One last thing, i wouldn't send my hypothetical kids to a school where there's a bunch of non-vaccinated kids running around, as much as i wouldn't send them to a school where washing your hands is forbidden.
edit on 30-11-2015 by vjr1113 because: (no reason given)

edit on 30-11-2015 by vjr1113 because: spelling


it is grossly irresponsible to let your kids be exposed to a disease you're probably already immune to.
edit on 30-11-2015 by vjr1113 because: (no reason given)

edit on 30-11-2015 by vjr1113 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 30 2015 @ 05:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bluntone22
Just out of curiosity, does this dose of mercury pose any more danger than eating tuna once a week?


That is a very astuute question, the answer to which requires a bit of chemistry. Mercury can be dangerous due to someting called bioaccumulation, which is when the mercury is not thoroughly metabilized and excreted from the body. That happens with methylmercury (CH3Hg). Accumulation does not occur with ethyl mercury (CH3CH2Hg), which is what is in Thimerisol, the preservative in multi-dose flu vaccine.



posted on Nov, 30 2015 @ 05:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bluntone22
Just out of curiosity, does this dose of mercury pose any more danger than eating tuna once a week?


Ingestion vs straight into the tissue? How could it possibly pose a greater danger bypassing the body's entire excretory system?



posted on Nov, 30 2015 @ 05:12 PM
link   
All medications contain mercury and other heavy metals . They are the "preservatives" for the meds. Longer shelf life ya know. Never mind the effects on children or long term effects such as hypertension medication for older folks . Money .




posted on Nov, 30 2015 @ 05:22 PM
link   
a reply to: F4guy



Accumulation does not occur with ethyl mercury (CH3CH2Hg), which is what is in Thimerisol, the preservative in multi-dose flu vaccine.

At least thats what we are told , right ? How does one verify ? From the same chemical companies that produce the vaccine ?
My outlook :
1) Question everything
2) Trust in God , all others have to pay cash...

edit on 30-11-2015 by Gothmog because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 30 2015 @ 05:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: Metallicus

originally posted by: Bluntone22
Just out of curiosity, does this dose of mercury pose any more danger than eating tuna once a week?


Few people feed tuna to children this young. They are forcing this shot on children under 3 y/o and it is dangerous enough that California is overriding their own safety protocols to push this shot on these kids.


Have you ever looked at the packaging on stuff you buy?

You'd be surprised at the amount of stuff you pick up that has a special warming on it dealing specifically with California and pretty much nowhere else. California is Cancer Product central.



posted on Nov, 30 2015 @ 05:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Gothmog

I know. You better be careful about that other common poison so many people eat all day, every day. I mean I know they say the chlorine in NaCl is supposedly safe and metabolized completely different than chlorine gas, but how do we really know?




new topics

top topics



 
51
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join