patterson bigfoot stabilised ~fake, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 11-1-2005 @ 06:09 PM by cereal
Originally posted by Peronemlin
Kal Korff has supposedly found the people who fake the film (Patterson´s friends) and have reproduced it.

I don´t trust much in Korff, but anyways, here are a couple of links:

www.findarticles.com...
www.roswell.org...


Interesting, but I'm not really convinced by that. Its very impressive how well its seems to have been reenacted, especially in that seocnd link, but I'm not totally convinced about this. After all, it can't be all that difficult to reenact (or is it?). Besides, even if the Patterson film is fake that doesn't dismiss the possibilty of bigfoot like they make it seem.


reply posted on 14-1-2005 @ 07:23 PM by Vegemite
Originally posted by Jedi_Master
Thanks SethJaneRob...

Oh...and about the Bob Hieronimus confession, here is something to think about, it is from a Baltimore City Paper On-line, cached on the BFRO site...

"This is just to make money--to sell a book," Hieronimus says. "And Fox [television] will push it."

(As it turns out, the details of Heironimus' alleged faux film work are revealed in the recently released tome The Making of Bigfoot byGreg Long--a writer/researcher Hieronimus brands "not too reliable.")


www.bfro.net...

Sounds to me like old Bobby boy is just out to make a buck...




Maryland has the highest number of bigfoot sightings in the US. I personally believe its because of black bear here. They're rare enough not to be found but numerous enough to be seen. Ive seen them on a few occasions and if you were traveling in a car you'd probably think it was a bigfoot.


However I do believe bigfoots real


reply posted on 15-1-2005 @ 01:12 PM by F215
Afternoon, folks. I just found this site through an indirectly related Google search and thought I'd check it out.

The key to this is in the "creature's" fur. Real hair or fur on an animal will have a relatively regular direction to it, resulting from the position of the follicles that will, by design, allow the smoothest passage through the animal's surroundings. This is exactly what you don't see in the Patterson-Gimlin footage. The fur is going every which way, like a shag carpet, even in specific anatomical areas, where one would expect to see some coherence. Additionally, artificial black fur/hair is actually really, really dark blue. It is created using an indigo dye, and this will show up on a digital analysis as blue pixels in areas where light directly strikes the fibers. Real black fur/hair is actually really, really dark brown. The only thing in nature that is truly black is carbon (charcoal). I'd bet that if one were to digitally analyse the film that there would be some blue pixels popping up, although the age and degradation, as well as the low quality of the original film might adversely affect this type of scrutiny. The last part of the footage that really kills it is the way the subject walks, which is wholly inconsistent with subsequent "eyewitness encounters." The walk is decidedly human, despite the stilted analyses of various "experts" who are clearly seeing only what they want to see. I have seen additional film where a tall man (approx. 6'2"+) walked along the same path as the subject of the Patterson-Gimlin piece and mimicked the gait and arm swings perfectly. The two films were juxtaposed and it became obvious that the 1967 film was nothing more than a hoax. Patterson and his cronies weren't lacking for a sense of humor, either, when they went over the top and gave Sasquatch breasts and a big fat butt. Notice that there isn't any well-defined muscularity or contraction/relaxation in the subject's gluteal region, which one would certainly see in a creature with such muscle density.

I'm not denying the possibility of Bigfoot's existence, as I've known more than one person who has either heard vocalizations similar to those recorded or has been stalked/chased by something very large and very fast in forested areas near swamps just after dark. Unfortunately, Patterson has been vilified by a number of acquaintances for various cons over the years. He apparently had a knack for screwing people over, which speaks to his overall character and veracity. So, while Sasquatch may indeed roam the forests on North America, I don't think you'll catch a glimpse of the old wookie in the Patterson-Gimlin footage.

[edit on 15-1-2005 by F215]

[edit on 15-1-2005 by F215]

[edit on 15-1-2005 by F215]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Strange creatures from Marianas Trench
  Posted 4 days ago with 26 member flags
\'Woolly mammoth\' caught on camera in Siberia
  Posted 2 days ago with 18 member flags
icelandic lake monster spotted! (VIDEO)
  Posted 4 days ago with 16 member flags
The Bridgewater Triangle
  Posted 17 days ago with 10 member flags
Bigfoot Attack...or is the Lizard Man in Georgia?
  Posted 9 days ago with 5 member flags
\'mutant spider fears at nuclear wastelab\'
  Posted 4 days ago with 4 member flags
Shape-Shifting Dinosaurs by Jack Horner (TED Talk)
  Posted 0 days ago with 4 member flags