Thanks for that link, i haven’t seen the video in 8 years.
The last time i saw it, it was on a documentary that pointed out that the creature depicted in the film had breasts, and indeed if you look as it
turns it has breasts. The documentary pointed out how naturally those breast moved with the creature, admittingly it does not appear as obvious as i
remember seeing it in the documentary but why would they have added such large breasts to the suit.
The belt could just be a mass of hair at the base of its back [i have the same problem myself] the line witch runs down the back of the creature could
also be due to the thickening of the hair in that region. Also look closer at the hands the base of the feet and the creature’s muscular detail. I
don’t think this proves it was a hoax even if Patterson said it himself, there may have been reasons for his submission.
One thing that does bother me is the positioning of its butt it would be interesting to compare a gorilla standing upright at a side angle.
Edit to say: i didn’t check out the rest of the link as i got carried away but that’s ats members, they even have side on pictures of upright
gorilla’s.
[edit on 14-1-2005 by kode]