It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: wildb
a reply to: HighFive
Yes. Automatic weapons
No I am sorry, they are legal...you are incorrect..
You don't even have to cite a source, My point still stands, we already limit who can own weapons and what kinds, and magazine capacity, barrel length on shotguns, etc. I was explaining how that relates to "shall not be infringed"
originally posted by: Eilasvaleleyn
a reply to: ketsuko
Even if you're being sarcastic, knives and guns are not the same thing. Knives are not exclusively a weapon.
originally posted by: wildb
a reply to: HighFive
But right now someone with a restraining order against them can go online and buy a gun without a BC
False, where do you get this info, again incorrect..
originally posted by: projectvxn
Colorado is a gun control state.
Didn't work.
Glad I don't have to call this idiot my Commander in Chief anymore.
though thats true it is usually considered a tool it becomes a weapon when you use it as such
originally posted by: wildb
originally posted by: Eilasvaleleyn
a reply to: ketsuko
Even if you're being sarcastic, knives and guns are not the same thing. Knives are not exclusively a weapon.
Really, if I took a knife and sliced open your gut to spill your guts on your shoes for you to see just before you die, is it not a weapon..
originally posted by: HighFive
But right now someone with a restraining order against them can go online or to their neighbor and buy a gun without a BC. I don't let perfect be the enemy of good.
Over 2 million people have been denied gun purchases by background checks since the Brady Bill passed. The system works it's not perfect.
originally posted by: HighFive
originally posted by: wildb
a reply to: HighFive
But right now someone with a restraining order against them can go online and buy a gun without a BC
False, where do you get this info, again incorrect..
Statements like that are usually followed by citing a source but since you don't have one,
Google : Private gun sales without background checks. Or. Online gun sales without background check Or
Difference between a FFL and private seller
originally posted by: Eilasvaleleyn
a reply to: stormbringer1701
Then why the @^!%*(*(!^%#!*(^#%! god damned $&@*&$@*(! do you allow the patriot act to exist?
originally posted by: ReadLeader
a reply to: Eilasvaleleyn
I beg to differ. As mentioned in a previous post, the 21 ft rule. (Please feel free to google) is still an important item in today's LEO training. As far as the 2nd and 4th ..... the fight of the American Revolution. ...see below. The 2nd, mostly self explaining. ..
The Fourth Amendment requires not only that search warrants be supported by probable cause but also that they "particularly" describe the person or place to be searched. A warrant must provide enough detail so that an "officer with the search warrant can, with reasonable effort, ascertain and identify the place [or person] intended" (Steele v. United States, 267 U.S. 498, 45 S. Ct. 414, 69 L. Ed. 757 [1925]). For most residences, a street address usually satisfies the particularity requirement. However, if a warrant designates an apartment complex, hotel, or other multiple-unit building, the warrant must describe the specific sub-unit that will be searched. When a warrant designates that a person will be searched, it must include a description that provides enough detail so that the suspect's identity can be ascertained with reasonable certainty.