It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ForteanOrg
As you well know, the declaration of Independence was issued in 1786.
Let's see, I quoted the 2nd too, didn't I? "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." By putting this in the very same line, it is clear to me that the authors meant that bearing a gun should only be done in that context: as part of a well regulated Militia.
originally posted by: Eilasvaleleyn
a reply to: FamCore
TPP? The deadline for it should be soon...
Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
originally posted by: HighFive
a reply to: Sublimecraft
Background checks on private sales and online sales does not equal " gimme ya guns"
I hope mental health records become available to the agencies that do background checks, but what's the point If the crazy person or criminal can go around the background check? That's why we call it common sense gun control. That's why even most NRA members support universal background checks.
originally posted by: stormbringer1701
really, when the delegates wen't back to their respective states to argue for ratification and said that they meant it to mean regular private citizens that means that's what the 2nd amendment means. There is no alternate meaning possible when the writers said plainly what they meant by it. I cited several of them. i also cited several of their contemporaries on the meaning of it. They all knew what it meant. You cannot find one of them that said it didn't mean gun ownership was an individual right.
What is frightening is men and women who are constrained by their own stare decisis on how the constitution ought to be analysed when determining it's meaning are divided along ideological lines 5/4 in heller for example.
originally posted by: ForteanOrg
a reply to: Donkey_Dean
You are right: regulations won't stop outlaws. But it will stop the 85 deaths cause by fire arms related accidents - each day.
originally posted by: vor78
a reply to: ForteanOrg
The true purpose of 2A was to ensure that the militias could never be disarmed by guaranteeing a right of the individual citizen to keep and bear arms for their own defense and in common defense of the country.