It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: projectvxn
Oh, it could totally be an anti-abortion person and I won't deny that, but until they actually release that information, we don't know.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: projectvxn
Oh, it could totally be an anti-abortion person and I won't deny that, but until they actually release that information, we don't know.
originally posted by: Swills
But again, it's to early to tell what his motives were.
originally posted by: NthOther
originally posted by: Swills
But again, it's to early to tell what his motives were.
You were the first person to inject partisan rhetoric into the discussion in a blatant attempt to the manipulate the thread into your preferred, predetermined narrative.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: angeldoll
I've made my peace with it. Sooner or later, they will get the case that validates all their feelings and justifies everything they think, feel, and say. We might as well accept that.
I gave up on worrying about it because I don't like the sick feeling of dread every time one of these things happens that it will indeed be "that day."
And until then, they'll waste no time spiking the football anyhow.
originally posted by: NateTheAnimator
Lets say for sake of argument that this man's motive was a pro-life/anti abortion stance and he did attack Planned Parenthood for that reason.
As much as I disagree with the "pro-lifers" I don't think this mans actions should invalidate or discredit any of what the movement represents. Therefore this man's actions represent a fringe minority of extremest willing to act on their crazy political beliefs and should not reflect on the pro-lifers as a whole.