It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: InnerPeace2012
If this is true, than expect some unusual pics coming our way soon...
The curves are all swinging upward fairly rapidly. So we look at what we know about the technology we are using for surveillance, just the USA, not other countries, what we do and what we know and the kind of surveillance we can do. There is no doubt in my mind that today if not many times over the past fifty years we have had the surveillance capabilities to completely monitor the activities of certain UFO flights –and know exactly when they’re going, where they’re going, how they’re going, where they appear form and leave to, all the characteristics about them – we have radar based devices that will not only show the distance, direction and azimuth of an object and all that but will also how shape. We have devices the army has developed for tracking projectiles – they check the acoustic wave and when something crosses over they can immediately track that data and go back to the source. That’s how they track where a mortar is or a howitzer. We can use that same technology – and its portable – for tracking UFOs.
I don’t believe any of these things fly over our country today without being known and if somebody wanted the UFO mystery to completely disappear they could in five minutes release enough data to show exactly what’s going on and is not going on.
link
originally posted by: kuraijanai2013
I posted this same story a week ago and it was binned by moderators. Why???
originally posted by: JimOberg
On the modules' exterior he had mounted TV cameras to scan space. Don't you suspect it might be interesting to find out what those cameras saw, or didn't see?
originally posted by: JoeHansen
a reply to: JimOberg
Hey jim.. of course i am.. so any idea when Bigelow's firm is gonna relase them? and do you know anything about the captured film in them?
and thanks for the new info karl
originally posted by: JoeHansen
a reply to: JimOberg
Okay, and thanks for your answer.. i thought that there was 2 in competition to win the nasa ticket? didten know that Bigelow was one of them.. but everything space is interesting! well there is the theory that Bigelow's firm, is now receiving anything ufo related from the us air force..dont know if any of that is true, but alast it could be nice to share what ever they might have..
originally posted by: 111DPKING111
a reply to: karl 12
I havent read or seen the Red Bluff case covered before, good stuff. I like the 1960 date on it as well.
"We made several attempts to ... get closer to it, but the object seemed to be aware of us and we were more successful remaining motionless and allow it to approach us, which it did on several occasions." Each time it did so, they experienced strong radio interference as the UFO emitted a red beam of light that swept the area and illuminated the ground. "The object was capable of moving in any direction. Up and down, back and forth ... it moved at high (extremely) speeds and several times we watched it change directions or reverse itself while moving at unbelievable speeds."
California Highway Patrol Officers Charles A. Carson and Stanley Scott
originally posted by: karl 12
This is a good example with police officers and this is another example involving military personnel.
I know you think the object in the Portage county case was the planet Venus but any ideas on the other incidents mentioned like Edwards or Kirtland?
originally posted by: karl 12
originally posted by: 111DPKING111
a reply to: karl 12
I havent read or seen the Red Bluff case covered before, good stuff. I like the 1960 date on it as well.
Fascinating multiple police officer UFO case that one mate, especially when the object is reported to have emitted a red beam of light (and electromagnetic interference) - the part when the officers describe the flight characteristics is also pretty eye-opening.
"We made several attempts to ... get closer to it, but the object seemed to be aware of us and we were more successful remaining motionless and allow it to approach us, which it did on several occasions." Each time it did so, they experienced strong radio interference as the UFO emitted a red beam of light that swept the area and illuminated the ground. "The object was capable of moving in any direction. Up and down, back and forth ... it moved at high (extremely) speeds and several times we watched it change directions or reverse itself while moving at unbelievable speeds."
California Highway Patrol Officers Charles A. Carson and Stanley Scott
I suppose if we had a satellite on hand back then we could zoom in and try to discern the nature of the object - I'm sure the National Reconnaissance Office would have been interested but they weren't around then (established 12 days later).
originally posted by: karl 12
This is a good example with police officers and this is another example involving military personnel.
I know you think the object in the Portage county case was the planet Venus but any ideas on the other incidents mentioned like Edwards or Kirtland?
Suppose I should have known better than to ask you your opinion on the nature of objects involved in specific UFO cases like Red Bluff, Edwards, Kirtland or La Joya Military Base Jim (but you are a self styled 'UFO expert' after all).
Can I ask you why you always refuse to comment on some of the more interesting cases?
It does state in this article that you actually used to be a 'Security Officer' at Kirtland Air Force Base (in charge of maintaining safeguards for classified government documents) so isn't it reasonable to assume you would be slightly curious about a major radar confirmed UFO event there on November 4th, 1957?