It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The second pilot of Russia’s Su-24, shot down by a Turkish fighter jet on Tuesday, insists that his plane did not cross into Turkey’s airspace, and says he was given no visual or radio warning before being fired at.
originally posted by: majesticgent
RT is a buzz with breaking news as of late.
The second pilot of Russia’s Su-24, shot down by a Turkish fighter jet on Tuesday, insists that his plane did not cross into Turkey’s airspace, and says he was given no visual or radio warning before being fired at.
www.rt.com...
originally posted by: svetlana84
Breaking: Rescued Pilot says there was no warnings before shootdown:
www.rt.com...
originally posted by: Belgianbloke
originally posted by: svetlana84
Breaking: Rescued Pilot says there was no warnings before shootdown:
www.rt.com...
I wouldn't expect an honest answer from both sides mate. Of course the Russians will say they didn't get a warning.
According to a letter Turkey sent to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and the 15 members of the UN Security Council, the Russian warplane, flying at 19,000 feet, “violated Turkish national airspace to a depth of 1.36 miles and 1.15 miles in length for 17 seconds.” If you do the math on that, it means the Su-24 was basically flying at stall speed.
originally posted by: CynConcepts
If Putin did this a few days ago, the whole world would be up in arms and against Russia's bombardment along this border. Now, it seems no one is blinking since most will say it is 'tit for tat'. I am starting to wonder if Putin is smarter than given credit. Was the shooting down of his plane a tragedy or strategy?
originally posted by: Belgianbloke
According to a letter Turkey sent to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and the 15 members of the UN Security Council, the Russian warplane, flying at 19,000 feet, “violated Turkish national airspace to a depth of 1.36 miles and 1.15 miles in length for 17 seconds.” If you do the math on that, it means the Su-24 was basically flying at stall speed.
originally posted by: svetlana84
Breaking: Rescued Pilot says there was no warnings before shootdown:
www.rt.com...
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
originally posted by: svetlana84
Breaking: Rescued Pilot says there was no warnings before shootdown:
www.rt.com...
Trust me, whether there was a warning or not the Russians KNEW they were being shadowed. Those F-16's lit up those Russian bombers like the noon day sun with radars.
They played with fire and got burned. The real question is whether it was intentional or not.
“In actual fact there were no warnings at all. Neither through the radio, nor visually, so we did not at any point adjust our course. You need to understand the difference in speed between a tactical bomber like Su-24, and that of the F16. If they wanted to warn us, they could have sat on our wing,” said Murakhtin, who is currently recuperating at Russia’s airbase in Latakia, in northern Syria.
originally posted by: SBargisen
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
originally posted by: svetlana84
Breaking: Rescued Pilot says there was no warnings before shootdown:
www.rt.com...
Trust me, whether there was a warning or not the Russians KNEW they were being shadowed. Those F-16's lit up those Russian bombers like the noon day sun with radars.
They played with fire and got burned. The real question is whether it was intentional or not.
Nah... The real question is, why would Turkey risk getting involved in a war they would lose.
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
They played with fire and got burned. The real question is whether it was intentional or not.
originally posted by: SBargisen
originally posted by: majesticgent
RT is a buzz with breaking news as of late.
The second pilot of Russia’s Su-24, shot down by a Turkish fighter jet on Tuesday, insists that his plane did not cross into Turkey’s airspace, and says he was given no visual or radio warning before being fired at.
www.rt.com...
Turkey merely defends the oil they bought from ISIS. Great job Turkey, may your souls rest in peace.
originally posted by: sosobad
Maybe they got the go ahead from a country able to take on Russia...
originally posted by: majesticgent
Of course the true intentions will never be known, but there must have been some sensitive and highly valued assets in the area near the Su-24 for the shoot down order to be given with such rapid notice.
It would seem as if it happened so rapidly that the Su-24 didn't have a chance to perform any counter measures to spoof the coming missiles.
originally posted by: SBargisen
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
originally posted by: svetlana84
Breaking: Rescued Pilot says there was no warnings before shootdown:
www.rt.com...
Trust me, whether there was a warning or not the Russians KNEW they were being shadowed. Those F-16's lit up those Russian bombers like the noon day sun with radars.
They played with fire and got burned. The real question is whether it was intentional or not.
Nah... The real question is, why would Turkey risk getting involved in a war they would lose.
The Turkish Armed Forces collectively rank as the second largest standing military force in NATO, after the United States Armed Forces U.S. Armed Forces, with an estimated strength in 2015 of 639,551 military, civilian and paramilitary personnel. Turkey is one of five NATO member states which are part of the nuclear sharing policy of the alliance, together with Belgium, Germany and weapons of mass destruction Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands and weapons of mass destruction Netherlands. A total of 90 B61 nuclear bombs are hosted at the Incirlik Air Base, 40 of which are allocated for use by the Turkish Air Force in case of a nuclear conflict, but their use requires the approval of NATO.