It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Wolfenz
taking back.. a Look..
-- snipped to save space --
when the guy showed up they were give total privacy in a conference room and talked for THREE hours!
originally posted by: charlyv
a reply to: CornShucker
I had not heard of this before and find it obviously extremely interesting.
If there is a record of that conversation sequestered away in the place where FOI probes cannot touch... the revelations from that alone would probably solve everything we need to know.
That's not the case- the police allegedly found the killer within two hours. If Oswald was the shooter, the police did a good job.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: CornShucker
I see. Too bad. I think we know what they were thinking. The vast wealth of already available data out there is sufficient. My heart is broken whenever I have to read or see the suffering of his wife and brother. They killed Bobby and MLK, too. And the president of Vietnam, while his wife was in the US…
Diem and JFK were trying to find alternatives to warring with the North.
Ever read "Best Evidence"? Lots of good stuff in there, too.
originally posted by: charlyv
a reply to: CornShucker
Not reporting for duty, as a Marine reservist, would most likely result in an AWOL, in which he could have been arrested by the feds and wound up in Leavenworth, once he returned to the U.S.
I wonder how he got around that, or who fixed it?
As for the "doubles" for Oswald: How many pictures exist that would be good enough for photo forensics to determine that they were different people? Today, there is great tech for that, and wonder how much work has been done in that area.
Great info and thanks, I have some more avenues to peruse.
several similarities between the career of Lee Harvey Oswald and Thomas Arthur Vallee’s account of his own career:
Both were former Marines.
Both had served at Marine bases in Japan that hosted the U–2 spy plane: Oswald at Atsugi, Vallee at Camp Otsu.
Both had been involved with anti–Castro Cubans: Oswald in New Orleans, Vallee at a training camp at Levittown on Long Island, New York.
Both had recently started working at premises that overlooked the routes of presidential parades: Oswald at the Texas School Book Depository on Elm Street in Dallas, Vallee at IPP Litho–Plate at 625 West Jackson Boulevard in Chicago.
Thomas Vallee had been led along a trail that Lee Oswald would follow after him. In his most revealing interview, Vallee told investigative reporter Edwin Black that he had been assigned by the Marines to a U-2 base in Japan, Camp Otsu. Vallee thereby came under the control of the Central Intelligence Agency, which commanded the U-2 base in Japan.
Vallee also told Black that he later worked with the CIA at a camp near Levittown, Long Island, helping to train Cuban exiles to assassinate Fidel Castro. Oswald participated in a CIA training camp with Cuban exiles by Lake Pontchartrain, near New Orleans. Vallee's close CIA connections, like Oswald's, help to explain how he, too, came to be employed at a site over a presidential parade route. Thomas Arthur Vallee and Lee Harvey Oswald, two men under the CIA's thumb for years, were being set up, one after the other, as scapegoats in two prime sites for killing Kennedy.
In August 1963 as Oswald was preparing to move from New Orleans back to Dallas, Vallee moved from New York City back to Chicago. Just as Oswald got a job in a warehouse right over Kennedy's future motorcade route in Dallas, so, too, did Vallee get a job in a warehouse right over Kennedy's future motorcade route in Chicago. Like Oswald in Dallas (before his summer in New Orleans), Vallee found employment as a printer. He was hired by IPP Litho-Plate, Located at 625 West Jackson Boulevard in Chicago.
Unlike the story of Dallas, Berkeley Moyland's forbidden story had a peaceful conclusion. Lieutenant Moyland and Thomas Vallee met one more time at the cafeteria, under more relaxed circumstances---"just to shoot the bull," Moyland said.
Finally, the retired officer said, ending the story to his son, he received a message in the mail some time later that he believed came from Thomas Arthur Vallee. It was a greeting card that said "thank you." The card bore no signature. Yet Moyland felt certain it came from the disturbed but graterul man he had cautioned over breakfast and then turned in to the Secret Service.
Thanks to the intervention of Berkeley Moyland and the unidentified "Lee," Thomas Arthur Vallee was spared the shame of being identified in the public's mind as President Kennedy's assassin. He was arrested on a pretext two and a half hours before the president's plane was due to touch down at O'Hare Airport. They still had the responsibility of finding two of the four snipers who remained at large on the streets.
The anonymous police detectives and federal agents who informed the media after Dallas of Vallee's arrest in Chicago one month earlier never mentioned the Secret Service's detention and questioning of the two suspected snipers. After November 2, 1963, they and their two unapprehended comrades in arms vanished without a trace of their existence. The Dallas plot was then allowed to unfold smoothly, as if it had no Chicago paradigm. Higher orders insured the necessary amnesia. A Treasury Department official ordered Chicago Police Lieutenant Berkeley Moyland to forget his encounter with Thomas Arthur Vallee. Secret Service Special Agent in Charge Maurice Martineau sent the top-secret report of the four-man sniper team to Washington headquarters, where it was made inaccessible. But even that subterranean existence of the Chicago report created a problem for the Secret Service three decades later. In January 1995, the Secret Service deliberately destroyed all its records of the Chicago plot to kill President Kennedy (with other key JFK security documents) when the Assassination Records Review Board requested access to them.
originally posted by: Miracula2
The information I would like to have is how easily JFK went along with an assassination suggestion against a man who had not made an attempt on his life. If JFK agreed to easily he might have created some mistrust on American shores. That might have generated some hostility here, not just in Cuba after the failed Castro attempt.
Just because Castro was a communist doesn't mean he wasn't a moral person. The missile crisis thing. The US had missile presence in Europe for some time, and on submarines. But that hasn't motivated foreign heads of state to assassinate a US president. That's why I disagree with JFK's decision to assassinate Castro simply because of his nuclear defensive stance.
During that meeting Michael Forrestal rushed in and handed the president a telegram. Kennedy leaped to his feet and ran from the room. Arthur Schlesinger is known to have said that he hadn't seen him so upset and depressed since the Bay of Pigs.
originally posted by: Miracula2
The information I would like to have is how easily JFK went along with an assassination suggestion against a man who had not made an attempt on his life.
-- snip --
originally posted by: intrptr
He liked Diem, was working with him trying to avoid war. Thats why 'they' killed Diem. And JFK, RFK, MLK. Notice all assassinated by gunfire.
The modus operandi back then. CIA, FBI, Pentagon, Big Oil, Mob, Cuban patriots, all had reason to remove JFK from office. He was trying to stop the wars (Cuba, Vietnam, Communists) and the military industrial complex couldn't allow that. Their profit margins would evaporate back to selling jetliners and automobiles only.