WAR: FBI Charges Laser Suspect Under Patriot Act: Despite Acknowledging Not A Terrorist Act, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 5-1-2005 @ 12:40 PM by Djarums
I don't believe this has anything to do with the Patriot Act. I don't believe this has anything to do with "Terrorism" either.

I think what we have here is an example of a waste of brain matter proving his worthlessness to the world. This person is clearly a moron. Personally, I'd ban him from interacting with the rest of society, particularly his children (who he tried to blame for all this) because someone like him will only make other people dumber.

Those of you who are making light of the situation clearly aren't very bright. Firstly, did you find it funny when those kids threw a turkey at the lady's car? Was that harmless fun? Would it be harmless fun to put debris on train tracks? Oh hahaha he shined a blinding light at the pilots! Wouldn't it be a silly little prank if they crashed!

If you think a laser pointer is a toy, the only conclusion I can arrive at is that you've either never seen one, or you are unable to read the english language. The damn things are LOADED with warnings. There's warnings on the packaging, on the box, on the device itself. The product can cause blindness. There's nothing "toy" like or "funny" about that.

To the person who wondered about glass floors... Perhaps you didn't think of the fact that the aircraft was coming in for a landing, and the person wasn't shining the light from directly underneath it. Light is fully capable of travelling at angles other than straight up is it not?

In any event, I agree with all of you that this is not a terrorist patriot act case at all, but making light of a potentially VERY dangerous situation shows a pitiful form of ignorance. Don't let your activism get in the way of your common sense. This guy did a VERY dangerous thing, and whether or not you agree with other issues doesn't change that.


reply posted on 5-1-2005 @ 01:26 PM by Phugedaboudet
Originally posted by specialasianX
So being in a gang is terrorism and now pointing lasers at people is terrorism... all i can say is watch out american pretty soon anything you do will be dubbed terrorism...

This is ridiculous... i hope Australia doesnt ever impose a stupid law like this.


They already have, helping to crack down on this New Zealand guy:

www.aardvark.co.nz...

I would expect a nation with some of the most oppressive and restrictive immigration laws in the civilized world can afford to be a little less cranky towards their people and neighbors (lets not forget the universal ban on private gun ownership, too)



reply posted on 5-1-2005 @ 02:50 PM by JAK
I think this initial misuse of the act is huge news and does not bode at all well for the future. For those who predicted, who shouted about such things, the fruition of their concerns will be bittersweet.

To me it brings to mind the
Poison Girls 'Persons Unknown' regarding the The 1979 'Persons Unknown' Trial

Source - Guardian Newspaper Article
After release I came to England, only to be arrested by Special Branch and charged, with 'persons unknown', of conspiring to cause explosions. The case was variously dubbed the Persons Unknown trial or the Anarchists trial - we were all voluble if unsophisticated young enemies of the state, all states. We also had absolutely nothing to do with any explosions. After several months in custody, this charge was dropped and a different conspiracy charge preferred. Opening the Crown's case at the Old Bailey a year later, the prosecutor said we had conspired 'to overthrow society'. The jury acquitted us on all counts.

If I remember correctly it was: "conspiring with persons unknown " to commit a crime "on dates unknown against persons unknown". Such actions plant great faith in the legal system.

For those who might say in this case that the offender was an idiot and deserved such a thing I think you are missing the point.

    Pastor Martin Niemöller

      First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out--
      because I was not a communist;
      Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out--
      because I was not a socialist;
      Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out--
      because I was not a trade unionist;
      Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out--
      because I was not a Jew;
      Then they came for me--
      and there was no one left to speak out for me.

I really do think that unfortunately this is only the first of many.

Jack


reply posted on 5-1-2005 @ 02:52 PM by Damned
Originally posted by Djarums
If you think a laser pointer is a toy, the only conclusion I can arrive at is that you've either never seen one, or you are unable to read the english language. The damn things are LOADED with warnings. There's warnings on the packaging, on the box, on the device itself. The product can cause blindness. There's nothing "toy" like or "funny" about that.

To the person who wondered about glass floors... Perhaps you didn't think of the fact that the aircraft was coming in for a landing, and the person wasn't shining the light from directly underneath it. Light is fully capable of travelling at angles other than straight up is it not?

Do you take the warnings on a box of Q-Tips seriously? I imagine your ears are pretty nasty. Even your keyboard has a pretty serious warning, but you still use it, eh? Most of the warnings on things are for complete morons who can't read the warning anyway, and even if they could, they wouldn't understand it.
Admittedly, I don't know how high the plane was, but unless the guy lives right next door to the airport, there's not much chance he could've shined the light directly into the pilot's eyes. He was in his back yard! Even if the plane was landing, it would be very difficult.
Do you own a laser pointer? Try this. At night, try to shine it on a moving car's license plate and tell me how easy it is. Keep in mind, that car is going a lot slower than a jet. To think it's even possible to shine someone in a jet in the eyes for more than a millisecond is nothing short of ridiculous. The beam is small, and has to be aimed very precisely. You sound like someone who's never played with a laser pointer before. They are toys, or that's all they're mostly used for. Sure, you can go blind, if you stare directly into one for a few hours, maybe. Yes, I own one, and I've done all kinds of experiments with it. But mostly, I just have fun watching the dog chase the red dot.

[edit on 5-1-2005 by Damned]


reply posted on 5-1-2005 @ 05:31 PM by XL5


reply posted on 5-1-2005 @ 08:15 PM by Djarums
Since people are too lazy to actually read about the incident due to a lack of time (maybe too much time spent on Bush/NWO connections to this laser incident), I'll do the honors.

www.nydailynews.com...

You can check that article out because it answers a lot of questions some of you brought up, primarily the above poster "damned".

As stated in the article the plane was at approx 3,000 feet. As stated in the article the laser was Commercial Grade (not like your lil toy red dot shooter) used to test Fiber Optic Lines. Not shocking that it hit 3,000 feet considering that Green Lasers are offered to consumers as "novelties" which have a range of 9,000 feet in darkness. As can be seen here: www.thinkgeek.com...

While you're at it, since we're already doing some reading why not check out the Laser Institute's own safety page at: www.laserinstitute.org...
They state
"The energy a pointer can direct into the eye is many times brighter than staring directly at the sun."

and they relay one incident stating
She reported the incidents to her parents, adding that after the first exposure, everything looked green; after the second, she could temporarily not see out of her right eye.


I'm not saying these things are deadly weapons. But you must understand (if logic is an option here) that while piloting (and during landing of all times) a plane it's not funny to temporarily lose sight in an eye.

Last time I checked, Q-Tips don't cause retinal burns. Could misusing a Q-Tip cause damage? I'm sure. But this is a device that can actually cause damage during it's normal use and should be used responsibly. Not by a man with the intellect to blame an innocent 7 year old for his idiotic conduct.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 7 days ago with 83 member flags
Renowned Geophysicist Says Strange Sky Sounds Are Real
  Posted 2 days ago with 74 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 8 days ago with 72 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 7 days ago with 49 member flags
Is it morally wrong to take a life? Not really, say bioethicists
  Posted 14 days ago with 37 member flags