It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
A bit confusing but I think I get what you're saying. If there is something then there must be nothing as well. Just like with big and small, what is one without the other to compare it to?
The nothing is within the something and vice versa. Everything we see is virtually empty space, yet within that virtually empty space is everything. If nothing and everything exist together simultaneously, then so do the beginning and end. If the beginning and end exist simultaneously then there can only be eternity.
originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: LightSource
That doesn't explain anything. All you say is everything was always there and then it started creating infinity?
If you would have said 0 is antimatter and 1 is matter and were they collide they create time it would have made more sense.
Time only exists where motion is, without a spinning, or in general moving object there is no time. As proven by the time dilation phenomena.
How is it math to say "an infinite loop of time expires"? That's in theory alone impossible.
There is matter, anti matter and super dense matter btw and time, like gravity is a force created by interaction of matter...
I believe tough that our universe is experiencing loops, we expand, we collapse, spend energy, store energy and all over again, not in infinity but in sthg crazy big like 10*999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 years
originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: LightSource
Okay so approximately infinity. That would make it even harder for it to expire!
How can an infinite loop of time expire when you only approach it but never reach it?
originally posted by: TycoonBarnaby
a reply to: LightSource
Infinity is not a number. You cannot have an infinite number of anything.
originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: LightSource
Congratulations now you only have to figure out what is outside our universe and how that came to be. Which means you opened more question than you "answered".
Good luck with that!
originally posted by: Revolution9
originally posted by: TycoonBarnaby
a reply to: LightSource
Infinity is not a number. You cannot have an infinite number of anything.
Why not? Because you say we can't. Yet we can.
Recurring numbers:
One third of anything can not be resolved by maths. It is infinite: 3.3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 333333333333333
It still is not resolved. We could try for infinity to resolve it. No chance.
In actual FACT 1/3 is an illusion. It is impossible for a third to exist in maths.
In maths 1/3 can never be resolved according to the decimal system. It is a fallable system that has holes in it.
YET...
We can split a circle into 3 equal segments, 120 degrees each (except when we get down to the fine print of quarks, etc, then we may never be able to actually locate a true third).
So maths cannot quantitatively and definitely express a third in decimal terms. Yet degrees can. The decimal numeric system is thus limited and unable to represent 1/3. It cannot resolve it. This shows us that humans make systems that cannot accommodate the universe. Like a solar cycle will not fit our numerical definition of a year.
Are physicists using a language that is not actually up to the job of adequately explaining the universe in equations? I think yes they are ultimately trying to make the universe fit the maths that is their own invention and the universe will not fit our made up fairy tale limited system of mathematics.
originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: LightSource
Congratulations now you only have to figure out what is outside our universe and how that came to be. Which means you opened more question than you "answered".
Good luck with that!
originally posted by: TycoonBarnaby
originally posted by: Revolution9
originally posted by: TycoonBarnaby
a reply to: LightSource
Infinity is not a number. You cannot have an infinite number of anything.
Why not? Because you say we can't. Yet we can.
Recurring numbers:
One third of anything can not be resolved by maths. It is infinite: 3.3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 333333333333333
It still is not resolved. We could try for infinity to resolve it. No chance.
In actual FACT 1/3 is an illusion. It is impossible for a third to exist in maths.
In maths 1/3 can never be resolved according to the decimal system. It is a fallable system that has holes in it.
YET...
We can split a circle into 3 equal segments, 120 degrees each (except when we get down to the fine print of quarks, etc, then we may never be able to actually locate a true third).
So maths cannot quantitatively and definitely express a third in decimal terms. Yet degrees can. The decimal numeric system is thus limited and unable to represent 1/3. It cannot resolve it. This shows us that humans make systems that cannot accommodate the universe. Like a solar cycle will not fit our numerical definition of a year.
Are physicists using a language that is not actually up to the job of adequately explaining the universe in equations? I think yes they are ultimately trying to make the universe fit the maths that is their own invention and the universe will not fit our made up fairy tale limited system of mathematics.
1/3 is a rational number with an infinite decimal expansion. Totally OK.
Infinity, by itself, is not a number.